Does this sound right or make sense

[philip0825]

Thinking of doing this sometime down the road does this sound right. LT bbk headers connected to solo HFcats following by SS 2.5 cat back and end with MRT 2.0V axle back exhaust. If I'm wrong please help.

[Nutbutt]

Just go solo all the way ! HiFlo cat and Mach cat back with the j-tubes. It's designed to sound great. None better for service either. Just do the search, they all complain about the rasp without the integrated x resonator and the j- pipes do the rest.

['11CamaroLS]

Can't do both long tube headers and the solo cats, the bbk comes with high flow cats. You can do shorty headers and the high flow cats tho. The solo replaces both cats, with one cat and a resonator on each side. It bolts up right after the stock manifold, long tube headers move back the o2 sensors too far, but shortys don't. But honestly it's cheaper and has more gains to just get BBKs and use the high flows it comes with

[philip0825]

BBK LTs with HFcats that come with, SS 2.5 cat back with magnaflow x pipe and finish with MRT 2.0v will this be ok. Thanks for the replies guys much appreciated.

[rtcat600man]

Originally Posted by philip0825

BBK LTs with HFcats that come with, SS 2.5 cat back with magnaflow x pipe and finish with MRT 2.0v will this be ok. Thanks for the replies guys much appreciated.

That will sound great. It will be similiar to my set-up.

The LT headers from BBK and OBX are close enough that it won't change the tone.

OBX is catless which is the reason many have added the resonated X pipe.

I kept the stock mid pipes, you won't notice to much change by going to the SS.

And the MRT's are the same.

It could or should sound something like this (posted below).

[Apex Motorsports]

Originally Posted by '11CamaroLS

Can't do both long tube headers and the solo cats, the bbk comes with high flow cats.... But honestly it's cheaper and has more gains to just get BBKs and use the high flows it comes with

This.