![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
IG @Brian_ _Self
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS M6+17'Tesla Model S Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bristol, TN : Instagram @Brian_ _Self
Posts: 804
|
Best weight savings, what you've learned
What do you guys think the best weight reduction mod is for our vehicles? Speaking of course about things like passenger and rear seat removal and such, what have other members seen the best gains from? Or losses from in this matter... Haha
Sent from my VS986 using Tapatalk
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro SS, 2018 Colorado Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 2,207
|
Lighter wheels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
IG @Brian_ _Self
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS M6+17'Tesla Model S Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bristol, TN : Instagram @Brian_ _Self
Posts: 804
|
Agree, our wheels are incredibly heavy when took into count for rotating mass. What about like removals that anyone has done?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2014 Red Hot LS3 Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 4,266
|
It all starts with Jenny Craig
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 1LT Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Crestline, CA
Posts: 3,029
|
A few days ago, Motorhead posted this:
. http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=423990 Thanks, Motorhead... very informative! Using the info in the linked article, if one takes the rough curb weight of a 5th gen (edit: Oops, forgot to put, ""3750 lbs. or so"), and assumes 420 hp for an SS, 320 hp for a six- banger, we get weight to power ratios of: 8.93 lbs. per hp for the SS 11.72 lbs. per hp for the six (It's just weight divided by hp) One can then use the same formula to see the equivalency of added hp vs. weight loss: Adding 10 hp to an SS is sorta roughly equivalent to removing 85 lbs. of weight Adding 10 hp to a six- cylinder is sorta roughly equivalent to removing 120 lbs. of weight ... and vice versa! Last edited by Scalded Dog; 09-24-2015 at 05:13 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Drives: 2015 Camaro 1LT Auto Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Kansas city, MO
Posts: 39
|
Ive been thinking about rear seat delete due to the back seat being so small that no one but my dog will fit back there anyway. Also, if you have the spare tire set up like mine, you can always remove that. Aside from that, Id do carbon fiber mods like deck lid and hood, lighter/stronger calipers, drilled and slotted rotors, aluminum wheels (over steel) and things such as that.
A bit of imagination can go a long way. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro SS Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Central PA
Posts: 438
|
I have a carbon fiber hood and it weighs about the same as stock (both are very light). In no particular order: wheels, exhaust system, headers, lightweight seats, take everything out of your trunk, brakes and rotors. After that, it comes down to cutting and deleting. DietCoke had a nice thread on here concerning his "weight loss program". I think he ended up around 3500lbs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
IG @Brian_ _Self
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS M6+17'Tesla Model S Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bristol, TN : Instagram @Brian_ _Self
Posts: 804
|
Quote:
Sent from my VS986 using Tapatalk
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
IG @Brian_ _Self
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS M6+17'Tesla Model S Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bristol, TN : Instagram @Brian_ _Self
Posts: 804
|
Quote:
Sent from my VS986 using Tapatalk
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
COTW 9/16/13
Drives: 2011 2LT/RS Camaro IOM Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 10,089
|
Quote:
But the v6 weighs less than the v8 so your v6 values are slightly off if you are assuming both have the same curb weight. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 1LT Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Crestline, CA
Posts: 3,029
|
I went with a roughly estimated weight... options will make a difference, as will fluid levels, model year, etc... however, base curb weights for both cars are remarkably similar. Many sources even cite them at exactly the same weight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Drives: 2000 Camaro SS Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Louisville, Ky.
Posts: 25,165
|
Quote:
Going with long tube headers and aftermarket cat back is an easy way to improve sound, add 30+rwhp, and drop 60-70lbs. Racing Brake 2 piece rotors will improve brake performance and drop 25lbs. Last edited by Apex Motorsports; 09-24-2015 at 08:24 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2014 2SS/RS Camaro Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,420
|
Wheels of course, but don't forget the rotors. You can get much lighter, and better rotors. That'll save you rotating mass weight, which is huge.
__________________
2014 2SS/RS, L99, SW LTH w/HF Cats, GMPP Ex. Z/28 CAI, FR41s in PVD Black Chrome, Recaros, Pfadt Sway
377hp, 383tq 12.739@110.44 MPH |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 Camaro SS 1LE, 2001 Camaro SS Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Miami
Posts: 836
|
Wheels, clutch/flywheel, driveshaft. You would have to remove 10 times the amount of dry weight to get the same gain from removing a given amount of rotating weight. Lighter brake rotors are good too. Rotating mass comes first, then move on to tearing apart your interior and pulling dry weight from the car.
__________________
2017 GMC Canyon All Terrain- daily driver/dirt bike hauler
2015 Camaro SS 1LE- sold 2001 Camaro SS SOM M6- sold 1999 Firebird Formula A4- sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|