![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT RS Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Saratoga County, New York
Posts: 174
|
2011 V6: Where'd they get the power?
I wonder what Chevy tweaked on the '11 version of our engine to boost the HP?
It would be nice if we could obtain those additional ponies too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Retired
Drives: 2010 Camaro RS V6 #1301 DOB 3/23/09 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ithaca NY
Posts: 2,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 1LT RS Rally Yellow Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: southern Illinois
Posts: 2,973
|
8hp, and we already have VVT, I'm going to guess tune. Would be the easiest way to get the horsepower, and would go along with what others with a tune has seen at the ground, maybe 4-5rwhp. No retooling needed or new parts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '94 Z28+ '15 Z/28 Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cheektowaga, NY
Posts: 1,320
|
GM has a history of underrating their motors. They possibly didn't change a thing to it. Or they could have done something simple such as add +1 degree of timing under WOT conditions or leaned it out a teensy bit. I remember when the LS1 Camaro's came out with 305hp and were running mid/low 13's. They started popping up on dynoes all over and laying down 280-290 at the wheels which equates to around 350ish at the motor.
Even the crate motors that they sell always put down more power than what you pay for. They have to leave themselves some cushion in there for outside party testing which is why you'll never see them rate them right to the maximum that they are capable of. I remember when Ford rated their '99 Cobra Mustang at 320hp but they didn't actually produce that. They get sued a lot, lol. Here's what happens when you falsely advertise your car makes power that it really doesn't: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-56259362.html Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro LS Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,911
|
If it was a tune do you think this could be added to the 2010 models while still keeping your warranty intact??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 SVT Raptor, sold 2010 Camaro Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PNW....almost canada
Posts: 1,907
|
+1
__________________
- Pfadt Suspension Package; Springs & Sways
- Brembo Brake Upgrade (Yellow); Courtesy Fesler Built - Custom Magnaflow Exhaust - Blacked-Out Bowties & RS Emblems, Front bowtie delete - Full Dynamat Extreme Trunk Coverage - Tinted side markers - Interior DSV Customs Leather Upgrades - Airaid CAI V2 - Forgestar F14 Gunmetal 20x9, 20x11 - Doug Thorley Shorties |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '12 Toyota Tacoma Dbl Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 1,275
|
Ok I pulled this from the homepage:
Horsepower increase for V6 engine The 2011 Camaro V-6 engine completed SAE certification testing and is now officially rated at 312 horsepower at 6500 rpm and 278 lb-ft of torque at 5100 rpm. This rating is eight horsepower higher than the previous year and also marks an increase in torque from the 2010 rating of 273 lb-ft. “The 304 horsepower in the 2010 Camaro was actually a conservative rating on our end,” said Tom Sutter, GM V-6 chief engineer. “But we knew already that this award-winning engine produced at least the amount of power we stated, but now we’ve gone the extra step in certifying the engine for this application and have verified an additional 8 horsepower.” The 3.6-liter V-6 with variable valve timing (VVT) and direct injection employs four independent cam phasers to change the timing of valve operation as operating conditions such as rpm and engine load vary. The result is linear delivery of torque, with near-peak levels over a broad rpm range, and high specific output (maximum horsepower per liter of displacement) supporting overall engine response and drivability. When combined, direct-injection and VVT enable an unmatched combination of power, efficiency and low-emissions in gasoline V-6 engines. SAE certification is a voluntary power and torque certification procedure developed by the SAE Engine Test Code committee. This procedure (J2723) ensures fair, accurate ratings for horsepower and torque by allowing manufacturers to certify their engines through third-party witness testing. Chevrolet was the vehicle brand to begin using the procedure. I take this to mean that the engine we have and the 2011 engine are the exact same, just this time around they certified it for 312hp!
__________________
STANDING 1/4MI: 13.948@99.87 6600RPM HP/TQ Gains - 30.54HP/24.3TQ (NOT PEAK) |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro LS Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,911
|
so a change in number but no ACTUAL change.... interesting
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: ( . )( . ) Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,827
|
Thats what i understood from the statement as well, that its been a 312hp engine all along.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '12 Toyota Tacoma Dbl Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 1,275
|
Feel sorry for the guys that bought the 304hp stickers to put on the car.....bummer!
__________________
STANDING 1/4MI: 13.948@99.87 6600RPM HP/TQ Gains - 30.54HP/24.3TQ (NOT PEAK) |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Drives: 2010 SIM 1LT RS Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rockford, MI
Posts: 313
|
I don't know about you guys, but I'll be walking around with my chest puffed out a bit more now that I know I've got 312!
Ha!!! Just jokes.
__________________
In: Airaid CAI
Out: JBA Shorty Headers, MRT Axle-back Exhaust v1.0 Tuned by Trifecta |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro LS Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,911
|
makes my decision a lot easier, 2010 model here I come!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 2LT/RS auto IBM Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,255
|
Press release from Ford tomorrow: "We checked our 2011 Mustang V6 engine and we were wrong, it really has 313 hp! Honest!"
__________________
FAQs:
1. No, I do not have any strong opinions about the Monte Carlo. 2. Yes, I know what my name looks like. 3. Yes, but the medication helps immensely. 2LT/RS IBM/gray #21,895 ordered April 21st, delivered July 3rd ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: ( . )( . ) Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,827
|
well at least we passed the 305 of the mustangs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Think about this and the Z28 5th gen | 13F20 | Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics | 41 | 09-04-2010 01:59 AM |
| More Power for 2011 Mustang, will Camaro respond? | wsecure | Chevy Camaro vs... | 31 | 02-22-2010 03:18 PM |
| 2011 Camaro Z28 v6 turbo vs superchared v8 | Caliman93230 | Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics | 124 | 11-18-2009 03:26 PM |
| V8 and V6 Power Bands | usmcbmw | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 0 | 08-31-2009 09:08 AM |
| Well sunroof question answered (PIC) | Black5thgen | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 152 | 08-29-2009 11:23 PM |