Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Technical Camaro Topics > Wheels and Tires Talk Sponsored by The Tire Rack


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-07-2009, 08:22 PM   #43
NVMY68SS
Drives #296
 
NVMY68SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 1968 Camaro SS - 350/5 Speed
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Smithfield, NC
Posts: 953
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadMaxx View Post
While a live axle does have it's benefits for drag racing -- there have been SERIOUSLY fast cars on IRS in the last decade. Hell, take a look at the Viper and mkiv Supra community if one has doubts.

If you guys are going to proceed with the project -- can you get me the stock weights of the rear mufflers when you pull them off?
I don't have exact numbers on them, but I remember thinking they "felt" like 2-5 gallon gas cans full each..........

Seriously, the cat to muffler pipe section felt like 20-30 lbs and each muffler felt like 15-20 lbs maybe. I may be way off on this, but I know the FM 3" cat back kit with the mufflers was a big reduction in weight.
__________________
#296 Delivered 6-1-09 Dynoed 10-3-09 384.56HP 387.65TQ with the bolt-ons listed, no tune.....yet!
Roto-Fab CAI (Install pics here), Doug Thorley Shorties, Flowmaster American Thunder 409S Cat Back Vid
NVMY68SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 02:22 AM   #44
THUMPER20X
GM fix my PAINT U suck!
 
THUMPER20X's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 1SS/RS 6Spd
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Great Red North
Posts: 1,856
The solid axle does have advantages. However. I would not even bother at all unless it was Ford 9" The 10-12bolt is a pile IMO. The 9 is a superior piece in strength, durability and ease of gear change and setups.
__________________
THUMPER20X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 09:38 AM   #45
chevy454
 
chevy454's Avatar
 
Drives: '69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by THUMPER20X View Post
The solid axle does have advantages. However. I would not even bother at all unless it was Ford 9" The 10-12bolt is a pile IMO. The 9 is a superior piece in strength, durability and ease of gear change and setups.
A 10/12 bolt setup eats less hp, though, due to the pinion height, and it's quite a bit lighter...the GM units have lived beneath some pretty stout stuff...so if you're within the limits of a good 10/12 setup, you'll be ahead of a comparable 9-inch setup. But if you're talking crazy amounts of HP (and hooking it), the 9-inch is the safe bet...
__________________
'69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118, on F70-15 Polyglass tires, Pure Stock
'10 Yenko Camaro - 11.75 @ 117, LS7+A6+Converter
chevy454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 02:37 PM   #46
THUMPER20X
GM fix my PAINT U suck!
 
THUMPER20X's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 1SS/RS 6Spd
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Great Red North
Posts: 1,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by chevy454 View Post
A 10/12 bolt setup eats less hp, though, due to the pinion height, and it's quite a bit lighter...the GM units have lived beneath some pretty stout stuff...so if you're within the limits of a good 10/12 setup, you'll be ahead of a comparable 9-inch setup. But if you're talking crazy amounts of HP (and hooking it), the 9-inch is the safe bet...
I blew at 4 10bolts in my 93. Two were built with axles and some really awesome parts. You cant beat the 9". I was running 400hp and Drag radials. 10bolt is absolute crap.
__________________
THUMPER20X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 03:02 PM   #47
chevy454
 
chevy454's Avatar
 
Drives: '69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by THUMPER20X View Post
I blew at 4 10bolts in my 93. Two were built with axles and some really awesome parts. You cant beat the 9". I was running 400hp and Drag radials. 10bolt is absolute crap.
The 10 bolt is inherently weaker than the 12 bolt (lot smaller ring gear for starters), but the hp/weight savings theory (versus the 9 inch) is still true. It's a similar thing with the Dana 60...it's stronger than the Ford-9, but heavier and a hp pig to turn...if you can get away with the Ford-9 you'll be ahead of the game, but your setup may dictate the Dana. We had a Dana 60 in a big tire'd Chevelle years ago...man was that thing HEAVY.

It's funny, how different combos, in the hands of different people, react different. There's a high school kid here in town who can't keep a rear end under his truck (I helped him a bit with his last rear) even though he's just got a basic 350 in a 4x4 daily driver...but another guy here has an S10 drag truck, built sbc, stickies, decent converter, and he's still using the stock S10 rear end (7.5?). I told him it'd never work, he wanted to see how long it'd last...that was several years ago...
__________________
'69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118, on F70-15 Polyglass tires, Pure Stock
'10 Yenko Camaro - 11.75 @ 117, LS7+A6+Converter
chevy454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 11:40 PM   #48
chappy48

 
chappy48's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro Auto 2SS/RS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wauconda, IL
Posts: 878
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1320junkie View Post
and what makes you say thats a myth?
Wasn't saying it was a myth, just put it out there that a reputable car mag was saying it was a myth, and touting Ford engineers as the ones to say so. Maybe it's just something particular to the GT500...I don't know Just curious if anyone has actually done some serious testing on this ie. compared equivalent rear suspension setups for the quickest down the track.
chappy48 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009, 05:43 AM   #49
chevy454
 
chevy454's Avatar
 
Drives: '69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by chappy48 View Post
Wasn't saying it was a myth, just put it out there that a reputable car mag was saying it was a myth, and touting Ford engineers as the ones to say so. Maybe it's just something particular to the GT500...I don't know Just curious if anyone has actually done some serious testing on this ie. compared equivalent rear suspension setups for the quickest down the track.
The extra joints of the IRS system are gonna add resistance...I know from our older Corvette stuff that geometry is super critical an IRS setup. A minute amount of drag/friction doesn't sound like much in a daily driver setup, but I know in our race stuff we've picked up just by paying attention to brake/bearing drag, axle/housing runout, etc. I'm sure the drivetrain engineers @ the Big 3 could tell you in a second which setup is more efficient...and for my own curiosity, from a simple static weight standpoint, I wonder which setup would come out on top? Anyone have any poundage numbers on the 5th gen IRS setup vs. say a 4th gen solid axle, or even 12 bolt replacement?
__________________
'69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118, on F70-15 Polyglass tires, Pure Stock
'10 Yenko Camaro - 11.75 @ 117, LS7+A6+Converter
chevy454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 01:48 PM   #50
ShadowSky
 
ShadowSky's Avatar
 
Drives: 97 Z28,92 25th RS, 91 LX,82 GT
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MI / TX
Posts: 43
The only Real enemy to IRS is wheel hope and axle strength.

Gm 12s are not bad if they are built right, and pinion depth and lash is set correctly. I have saw 10 bolts make it to the 9s!
Sadly i was not one of them, the fasted i was able to get a 10 bolt to was 11.0s.

9'' are the bad boys on the block, cause that have 3 teeth in constant connection where others have 2. The street guy hardly races his car a 9 might be over kill cause of the gearing robs you of rwhp. For a hard core guy or a guy going with the plan of adding gobs of hp, it a insurance that you have a damn near bulletproof rear end..
__________________
Sky

Boost Or Die!!!
82 gt
92 25 anny RS
among others
ShadowSky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 02:01 PM   #51
speedster
SST...
 
speedster's Avatar
 
Drives: SST Camaro 2010
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: East Coast of Florida
Posts: 5,927
There are guys on here developing 12 bolt center sections, 33 spline axles, 300M stubs, etc. I was going to provide them my stock rearend to use as a template, but the SST Camaro is stuck in the chassis shop and neither me nor the engine builder can get to it. I hope to get the car back soon. It is overdue.
__________________

Last edited by speedster; 10-27-2009 at 08:20 PM.
speedster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2009, 09:52 PM   #52
Q-ship
 
Drives: 1968 Chevelle, 1971 Monte
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Peoples Socialist Republic of California
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by THUMPER20X View Post
I blew at 4 10bolts in my 93. Two were built with axles and some really awesome parts. You cant beat the 9". I was running 400hp and Drag radials. 10bolt is absolute crap.
You do know that there are more than one GM 10 bolt, the one in the 3rd and 4th gen F-body was the 7.5 (the glass jaw of the 10 bolts). The G-body used the 7.5 but the GN's got the good 8.5 that is the same rear axle used in 1/2 ton trucks. Then there was the 10 bolt from the early years 64 - 71 Camaro and Chevelle that are OK but not as strong as the 12 bolt. Do not compare the weak a$$ POS that was in your 93 as any indication of the strenght of all 10 bolts. The 12 bolt is every bit as strong as the 9" in most ways, the 9" is a bit easier to modify into many applications (sheet metal housing that is weaker) and gear changes are easier to do if you have complete center sections. The 12 has some stronger things than a 9" like larger pinion gear and bearings, the ring gear is only 1/8" smaller than the 9" and it is requires less HP to drive. As a complete rear axle the 12 bolt is lighter than the 9" even though the housing in actually stronger (sheet metal housing requires braces to keep from distoring), the weakness of the 12 is the axles and the c-clips. To put it in prespective, DeFranks used not a 9" or a Dana 60 in his Hemi AA/SS Baracuda....any guess what was in them? Thats right the 12 bolt GM.
Q-ship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2009, 05:58 PM   #53
xlr8nova
 
Drives: nova
Join Date: May 2009
Location: whitehall
Posts: 15
It would have been WAY easier to build a fabbed 9" center section. We could of had them done 10 times over by now. We're still getting the new shop going as time and money allows. I don't think we'll be able to make the December PRI show for our prototype, we're experiencing too many delays. However, if any of you guys here of a wrecked SS that we can possibly buy the center section from let me know. We are GM guys and thought you fellows would appreciate GM parts in your Camaros.
xlr8nova is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 11:24 PM   #54
autopat
 
autopat's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 IOM 2SS
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Casa Grande, AZ.
Posts: 111
Q-ship is correct, there are in fact several different "10 bolts" out there. There is the POS 7.5 in all 3rd and 4th gens, and that includes the aussie 9-bolt, there is the 64-71 8.2" POS. Then there is the tried and true 8.5", which has been in use in almost every GM car and truck, at one time or another. I have seen this rear end deal with an honest 650hp, at the wheels, now granted that's after some mods (IE better axles,fully welded tubes, spool or Detroit locker), but they do live and thrive in that environment. I have also seen 12 bolts (8.875") blow up behind a 6 cylinder in a 1/2 ton short bed truck, but I've also seen them live behind 600 lb/ft, under a big block Chevelle. It all depends on what you like, the 9" is a stout piece, no question, but there are alternatives out there that may be easier to find/adapt/pay for. Just depends on how much power you want, and how deep your pockets are.
__________________
So many projects... so little time.

2010 2SS, IOM, IOI, CGM stripes, L99
1999 Astro van, LS
1995 Saturn SC2
1994 Saturn SC1
1992 Saturn SL2
1991 Daihatsu HiJet
1981 C10 Beater, with a heater, er..A/C
1973 Nova SS, 385 stroker, TH400, FOR SALE! (soon)
1966 Suburban, LS bound! Still in a million pieces
1965 C-10, Short, Wide, Big window, all roller 355
autopat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2009, 07:14 PM   #55
strobi
MJ STROH
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LTRS
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buffalo, WY
Posts: 185
makes NO Sense to me, absolutely NUTZ!
strobi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2009, 04:41 AM   #56
xlr8nova
 
Drives: nova
Join Date: May 2009
Location: whitehall
Posts: 15
The 12-bolt replacement we are going to offer will only be offered with 33-up spline carriers. Axle manufacturers will only warranty axle shafts that are 33 spline and larger. Moser is also developing a straight axle conversion. They are experiencing the reason we headed in the IRS direction. Fuel tank/ Frame rail placement is a major issue. To do the straight axle conversion bottom line; you WILL have to cut your car, you WILL have to move put a fuel cell in your car, it WILL be very expensive.
xlr8nova is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Songs About Camaros (for your driving pleasure) Emjay 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 74 12-18-2014 12:42 AM
Detroit News panel wants GM to build Camaro concept Tran 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 12 03-15-2009 04:38 PM
Answeres to questions I have stumbled on dieseldave24v 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 13 02-23-2009 06:56 PM
4 SEMA CAMAROS finally unveiled by GM! (hi-res images & details) FenwickHockey65 Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery 237 11-03-2008 10:39 PM
Pedders partnering with GM Racing on Camaro suspension Info@PeddersUSA.com Wheels and Tires Talk Sponsored by The Tire Rack 6 09-30-2008 12:14 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.