![]() |
|
|
#43 | |
|
Drives #296
Drives: 1968 Camaro SS - 350/5 Speed Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Smithfield, NC
Posts: 953
|
Quote:
Seriously, the cat to muffler pipe section felt like 20-30 lbs and each muffler felt like 15-20 lbs maybe. I may be way off on this, but I know the FM 3" cat back kit with the mufflers was a big reduction in weight.
__________________
#296 Delivered 6-1-09 Dynoed 10-3-09 384.56HP 387.65TQ with the bolt-ons listed, no tune.....yet!
Roto-Fab CAI (Install pics here), Doug Thorley Shorties, Flowmaster American Thunder 409S Cat Back Vid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
GM fix my PAINT U suck!
Drives: 2010 Black 1SS/RS 6Spd Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Great Red North
Posts: 1,856
|
The solid axle does have advantages. However. I would not even bother at all unless it was Ford 9" The 10-12bolt is a pile IMO. The 9 is a superior piece in strength, durability and ease of gear change and setups.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
![]() Drives: '69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 178
|
A 10/12 bolt setup eats less hp, though, due to the pinion height, and it's quite a bit lighter...the GM units have lived beneath some pretty stout stuff...so if you're within the limits of a good 10/12 setup, you'll be ahead of a comparable 9-inch setup. But if you're talking crazy amounts of HP (and hooking it), the 9-inch is the safe bet...
__________________
'69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118, on F70-15 Polyglass tires, Pure Stock
'10 Yenko Camaro - 11.75 @ 117, LS7+A6+Converter |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | |
|
GM fix my PAINT U suck!
Drives: 2010 Black 1SS/RS 6Spd Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Great Red North
Posts: 1,856
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
![]() Drives: '69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 178
|
Quote:
It's funny, how different combos, in the hands of different people, react different. There's a high school kid here in town who can't keep a rear end under his truck (I helped him a bit with his last rear) even though he's just got a basic 350 in a 4x4 daily driver...but another guy here has an S10 drag truck, built sbc, stickies, decent converter, and he's still using the stock S10 rear end (7.5?). I told him it'd never work, he wanted to see how long it'd last...that was several years ago...
__________________
'69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118, on F70-15 Polyglass tires, Pure Stock
'10 Yenko Camaro - 11.75 @ 117, LS7+A6+Converter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro Auto 2SS/RS Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wauconda, IL
Posts: 878
|
Wasn't saying it was a myth, just put it out there that a reputable car mag was saying it was a myth, and touting Ford engineers as the ones to say so. Maybe it's just something particular to the GT500...I don't know
Just curious if anyone has actually done some serious testing on this ie. compared equivalent rear suspension setups for the quickest down the track.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |
![]() Drives: '69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 178
|
Quote:
__________________
'69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118, on F70-15 Polyglass tires, Pure Stock
'10 Yenko Camaro - 11.75 @ 117, LS7+A6+Converter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
![]() Drives: 97 Z28,92 25th RS, 91 LX,82 GT Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MI / TX
Posts: 43
|
The only Real enemy to IRS is wheel hope and axle strength.
Gm 12s are not bad if they are built right, and pinion depth and lash is set correctly. I have saw 10 bolts make it to the 9s! Sadly i was not one of them, the fasted i was able to get a 10 bolt to was 11.0s. 9'' are the bad boys on the block, cause that have 3 teeth in constant connection where others have 2. The street guy hardly races his car a 9 might be over kill cause of the gearing robs you of rwhp. For a hard core guy or a guy going with the plan of adding gobs of hp, it a insurance that you have a damn near bulletproof rear end..
__________________
Sky
Boost Or Die!!! 82 gt 92 25 anny RS among others |
|
|
|
|
|
#51 |
|
SST...
Drives: SST Camaro 2010 Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: East Coast of Florida
Posts: 5,927
|
There are guys on here developing 12 bolt center sections, 33 spline axles, 300M stubs, etc. I was going to provide them my stock rearend to use as a template, but the SST Camaro is stuck in the chassis shop and neither me nor the engine builder can get to it. I hope to get the car back soon. It is overdue.
Last edited by speedster; 10-27-2009 at 08:20 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
![]() Drives: 1968 Chevelle, 1971 Monte Join Date: May 2009
Location: Peoples Socialist Republic of California
Posts: 100
|
You do know that there are more than one GM 10 bolt, the one in the 3rd and 4th gen F-body was the 7.5 (the glass jaw of the 10 bolts). The G-body used the 7.5 but the GN's got the good 8.5 that is the same rear axle used in 1/2 ton trucks. Then there was the 10 bolt from the early years 64 - 71 Camaro and Chevelle that are OK but not as strong as the 12 bolt. Do not compare the weak a$$ POS that was in your 93 as any indication of the strenght of all 10 bolts. The 12 bolt is every bit as strong as the 9" in most ways, the 9" is a bit easier to modify into many applications (sheet metal housing that is weaker) and gear changes are easier to do if you have complete center sections. The 12 has some stronger things than a 9" like larger pinion gear and bearings, the ring gear is only 1/8" smaller than the 9" and it is requires less HP to drive. As a complete rear axle the 12 bolt is lighter than the 9" even though the housing in actually stronger (sheet metal housing requires braces to keep from distoring), the weakness of the 12 is the axles and the c-clips. To put it in prespective, DeFranks used not a 9" or a Dana 60 in his Hemi AA/SS Baracuda....any guess what was in them? Thats right the 12 bolt GM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
![]() Drives: nova Join Date: May 2009
Location: whitehall
Posts: 15
|
It would have been WAY easier to build a fabbed 9" center section. We could of had them done 10 times over by now. We're still getting the new shop going as time and money allows. I don't think we'll be able to make the December PRI show for our prototype, we're experiencing too many delays. However, if any of you guys here of a wrecked SS that we can possibly buy the center section from let me know. We are GM guys and thought you fellows would appreciate GM parts in your Camaros.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
![]() Drives: 2010 IOM 2SS Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Casa Grande, AZ.
Posts: 111
|
Q-ship is correct, there are in fact several different "10 bolts" out there. There is the POS 7.5 in all 3rd and 4th gens, and that includes the aussie 9-bolt, there is the 64-71 8.2" POS. Then there is the tried and true 8.5", which has been in use in almost every GM car and truck, at one time or another. I have seen this rear end deal with an honest 650hp, at the wheels, now granted that's after some mods (IE better axles,fully welded tubes, spool or Detroit locker), but they do live and thrive in that environment. I have also seen 12 bolts (8.875") blow up behind a 6 cylinder in a 1/2 ton short bed truck, but I've also seen them live behind 600 lb/ft, under a big block Chevelle. It all depends on what you like, the 9" is a stout piece, no question, but there are alternatives out there that may be easier to find/adapt/pay for. Just depends on how much power you want, and how deep your pockets are.
__________________
So many projects... so little time.
2010 2SS, IOM, IOI, CGM stripes, L99 1999 Astro van, LS 1995 Saturn SC2 1994 Saturn SC1 1992 Saturn SL2 1991 Daihatsu HiJet 1981 C10 Beater, with a heater, er..A/C 1973 Nova SS, 385 stroker, TH400, FOR SALE! (soon) 1966 Suburban, LS bound! Still in a million pieces 1965 C-10, Short, Wide, Big window, all roller 355 |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
MJ STROH
|
makes NO Sense to me, absolutely NUTZ!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
![]() Drives: nova Join Date: May 2009
Location: whitehall
Posts: 15
|
The 12-bolt replacement we are going to offer will only be offered with 33-up spline carriers. Axle manufacturers will only warranty axle shafts that are 33 spline and larger. Moser is also developing a straight axle conversion. They are experiencing the reason we headed in the IRS direction. Fuel tank/ Frame rail placement is a major issue. To do the straight axle conversion bottom line; you WILL have to cut your car, you WILL have to move put a fuel cell in your car, it WILL be very expensive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Songs About Camaros (for your driving pleasure) | Emjay | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 74 | 12-18-2014 12:42 AM |
| Detroit News panel wants GM to build Camaro concept | Tran | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 12 | 03-15-2009 04:38 PM |
| Answeres to questions I have stumbled on | dieseldave24v | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 13 | 02-23-2009 06:56 PM |
| 4 SEMA CAMAROS finally unveiled by GM! (hi-res images & details) | FenwickHockey65 | Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery | 237 | 11-03-2008 10:39 PM |
| Pedders partnering with GM Racing on Camaro suspension | Info@PeddersUSA.com | Wheels and Tires Talk Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 6 | 09-30-2008 12:14 PM |