![]() |
|
|
#85 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 68 Camaro 327ci 2SS/RS 376ci LS3 Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Prince William, VA
Posts: 2,703
|
?
Man that just wrong to do that to the Mustang,
I mean why not start out the gates with a new design. That orange Mustang with the glass roof looks better. |
|
|
|
|
|
#86 | |
![]() Drives: Camaro Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: MN
Posts: 115
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
7 year Cancer Survivor!
Drives: 17 Cruze RS, 07 G6 GT, 99 Astro Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 21,546
|
The front looks like they did a combo of 69-70 mustang look...the rear quarter panel tops look sort of like the tops of the camaro's... to me the design just does not flow right.. something just don't fit...
__________________
Cancer's a bitch! Enjoy life while you can! LIVE, LOVE, DRIVE...
The Bird is the word! |
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
![]() Drives: 1981 Z28 Camaro Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kelowna B.C Canada
Posts: 307
|
In order for it to be a true Challenger competitor Ford will need to add a bunch of weight to get it closer to the magical 4000 pound lol
Last edited by gladiatoro; 09-12-2008 at 11:32 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#89 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Muscle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,314
|
Quote:
guys face it. The challenger could sink the titanic, the the mustang could have been built by LEGO imo. why are we ignoring the true superior being here, which is the camaro?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Moderator
|
I have to say, even though the exterior is not awe-inspiring, the interior is a definite improvement. The current interior looks cheap with excessive chrome. The new dash has some dimension to it that wasn't there before.
At least the Challenger is really great-looking. Even it's overwhelming weight isn't that much a problem because there's a lot of power to match. The Camaro has the advantage on power-weight ratio and a balanced style of new with old lines. While the Mustang currently has a look of similar style, a refresh will violate that look with too many awkward features. I'm so grateful that GM got this right by consulting enthusiasts.
__________________
RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet//
Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN. warn 145:159 ban |
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
![]() Drives: 1981 Z28 Camaro Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kelowna B.C Canada
Posts: 307
|
we all have our own opinion that's what makes this forum great so we can all vent
|
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Muscle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#93 | |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
__________________
RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet//
Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN. warn 145:159 ban |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
![]() Drives: '02 Impreza 2.5RS Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 304
|
I will never understand as to why anyone, in any walk of life, for any reason at all would want to purchase a Mustang. I'm joking.
Anyway..I would be curious to know how many Mustangs would be sold to older men and women if Ford decided to take the shiny pony of the front of the Mustang.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
![]() Drives: 2005 Pontiac GTO Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 306
|
I know exactly what you mean. They don't excite you at all when you see them. Because they're so common I guess. Around every corner it's no surprise to see a Mustang. It's just a matter of how disappointed you'll actually be. If it's a GT you're a little disappointed that it's not something more exciting. If it's a 6 cylinder you want to light it on fire. That is if you're me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Muscle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Rice Harvester
Drives: 2014 Bright Yellow 2SS/RS Join Date: May 2008
Location: Plainview, TX
Posts: 1,449
|
Here's my objective opinions on the major three:
The Chally has the best looking exterior, but it needs to be about 5% smaller and they really should have attempted an original interior. The weight's already been brought up. The Mustang has a good looking exterior, but the interior definitely could use some polish (which I'm glad Ford took note of in the updated version). It's times rival the Chally SRT-8 at about 10k less (at MSRP, of course). Great bang for the buck, as long as you're going in a straight line. The Camaro's styling is simply "okay" to me in the pictures (I'm sure it will look much better in person, and in red). Well designed interior, and most likely the quickest of the three base V8 trims. Not wild about the trunk design, visibility is going to be poor, and premium fuel will hurt the wallet (although to my understanding, it CAN run on regular but will take a hit in power). |
|
|
|
|
|
#98 | |
![]() Drives: 1981 Z28 Camaro Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kelowna B.C Canada
Posts: 307
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2010 Mustang picture! | Twin Turbo | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 20 | 11-04-2008 04:01 PM |
| Exclusive Spy Video: 2010 Ford Mustang | camaro5 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 8 | 09-01-2008 09:48 PM |
| Watch out Mustang | darthknight72 | Chevy Camaro vs... | 34 | 08-12-2008 07:19 PM |
| 5.0L V8 could return in 2010 Mustang | camaro5 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 15 | 04-18-2008 07:41 PM |