![]() |
|
|
#57 |
![]() Drives: 94 Celica Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 13
|
with FI, you'll have to go to higher octane fuel and your gas mileage will drop; youre insurance would go up as well, as you should report the upgrades to your insurance co...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Red Brick of Vengeance!
Drives: 12 Second Brick Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
|
My insurance never went up and i checked with the insurance company... I was told they don't care what HP I had... the VIN said it was a 6 cylinder and that's all they went by...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Account Suspended
|
You think you are going to make the kind of power that beats V8's on your modded V6 using 87/89 octane unleaded? Good luck with that.
Last edited by garagelogic; 01-16-2010 at 11:23 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Turbos. Turbos. Turbos.
Drives: 2010 SS Yellow/Black Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Loveland, Colorado
Posts: 201
|
When will you all learn? Pay attention to the Grand National crowd. That's a 3.8L V6, making ungodly HP...look at the stats with those sixes.
The GN crowd has been worshiping the V6 for years. It's not uncommon to see 3600 lb. steel body Regals running 9's consistently. And they're always locking horns with the built V8 normally aspirated crowd. Turbos are actually more efficient than superchargers, turbo lag notwithstanding. In fact, the fastest piston driven cars on the planet are turbocharged. Don't underestimate the V6 when the rules change...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2006 Dodge Charger / 2SS IOM Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 | |
|
Turbos. Turbos. Turbos.
Drives: 2010 SS Yellow/Black Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Loveland, Colorado
Posts: 201
|
Quote:
My little V6 single-turbo Buick powered Cobra runs 11.40 ET and pretty much beats any LS motor or Ford BB I'm up against. and I get 25 MPG. Now I need to get my twin turbo Spyder to the track... Now, when you mod the LSx motor with forced induction, well that changes things. Much respect for the LS family at that point. I'd vote on the turbo'd V6 as a braggin' rights project. Been there, done that.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Turbos. Turbos. Turbos.
Drives: 2010 SS Yellow/Black Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Loveland, Colorado
Posts: 201
|
I always used the rough figure at 15hp/lb of boost. That one actually equated pretty well.
I should also add that if you are entertaining modding a V6 Camaro with the use of a turbo (or turbos), it would be beneficial to have an automatic trans to start with. You will get better acceleration and quicker ET's with the auto trans. It all has to do with spooling and boost; the boost hits, say, 15PSI from a launch, and STAYS there throughout the shifts. You can't do that with manual trans - you'd need to re-spool between shifts. Pay attention to the Buick crowd. Lots of info there.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Turbos. Turbos. Turbos.
Drives: 2010 SS Yellow/Black Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Loveland, Colorado
Posts: 201
|
Since the V6 has base compression pretty high, you would need to limit turbo boost to say, 6 or 7 PSI. To really attain the big boost, you actually need to reduce your base cylinder compression. The 3.8L engines were around 7-1/2 to 1 base compression for the turbo applications.
The poor man's trick was to double up on the head gaskets. But the right way would be to install dished pistons to lower the base compression. It seems the ECU has enough lee-way to get you enough fuel to suit your tastes, with a basic tune. Direct injection reduces the detonation effect so that's a plus.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
![]() Drives: 1SS/RS 2010 Camaro Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cape May, NJ
Posts: 57
|
Twin turbo seems a little too expensive, unless it gives results that surprise people. single turbo might be good enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Red Brick of Vengeance!
Drives: 12 Second Brick Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
|
yep... single would be fine... Twins to show off! LOL!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | |
|
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
What I said still holds true. The fast V6 cars do NOT run 87/89 octane pump gas. Sure, they CAN run on it, but not without an alcohol assist at higher boost levels. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
|
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
I'm hoping for mid-10's on the 93 octane daily-driving tune/boost level I'm running on the car right now. My last car, a KenneBell 2007 GT500, making a little less horsepower and quite a bit less torque, ran a 10.76 @ 131mph on drag radials with a 1.76 60ft time. That car, with driver, weighed 4160lbs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Account Suspended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 154
|
I hear J Leno turbo charges his car with his big dumb chin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| V8 Camaro Performance Upgrades List | Milk 1027 | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 93 | 08-30-2021 06:56 PM |
| Does the v6 have enough power? | cstproductions | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 305 | 08-29-2012 10:27 PM |
| Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release | Tran | Camaro Convertible Forum | 12 | 11-18-2009 08:05 PM |
| New Zex 2010 Camaro V6 Nitrous Kit - intro and free shipping @ PFYC.com | Redshift | Forced Induction | 0 | 07-16-2009 09:31 AM |
| 2010 Camaro, Decisions Decisions… (Winding Road Review) | Xmicro_SS | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 19 | 05-09-2009 12:40 PM |