Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Chevy Camaro vs...


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-28-2010, 01:29 PM   #29
Maurdib

 
Maurdib's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black Camaro 2LT/RS Auto
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Fernando Valley
Posts: 751
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViperTomcat View Post
The R/T's started in 09.

Mine is a 2010 Auto R/T that turns in average low-mid 13's, with the current fastest in my sig, just a CAI and nothing else.

Sounds like the R/T has a horrible driver, it should take apart a stock 2LT.
How much did your cost, I also love the challenger, Is the RT significantly cheaper then the SRT8?
__________________
BackInBlack
Performance:Vararam cold air intake
Maurdib is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2010, 01:52 PM   #30
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maurdib View Post
How much did your cost, I also love the challenger, Is the RT significantly cheaper then the SRT8?
R/Ts current starting price is 31610 including destination or more than the Mustang GT, but less than a 1SS.
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2010, 03:28 PM   #31
SweetSandMan
 
SweetSandMan's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 Cobalt SS
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Olmsted Falls, OH
Posts: 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViperTomcat View Post
The R/T's started in 09.

Mine is a 2010 Auto R/T that turns in average low-mid 13's, with the current fastest in my sig, just a CAI and nothing else.

Sounds like the R/T has a horrible driver, it should take apart a stock 2LT.
Do the Automatics tend to be faster than the 6-Speed ones?

The Challenger is the other car that I have in consideration...It's not as fast as its competitors...but my God the Hemi sounds like the most beautiful thing ever. Plus the Challenger is hands down the best looking of the 3 current muscle cars.
__________________
2008 Cobalt SS - Not Stock
SweetSandMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2010, 05:13 PM   #32
ViperTomcat
Banned
 
Drives: 2011 Avenger Heat
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetSandMan View Post
Do the Automatics tend to be faster than the 6-Speed ones?

The Challenger is the other car that I have in consideration...It's not as fast as its competitors...but my God the Hemi sounds like the most beautiful thing ever. Plus the Challenger is hands down the best looking of the 3 current muscle cars.
They do tend to be faster and more consistent.

My Challenger was 31,585.
ViperTomcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2010, 10:38 PM   #33
mjf6866
 
mjf6866's Avatar
 
Drives: 09 Challenger R/T 6-speed 3.92 rear
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: sitting on an angry chair with angry walls that steal the air
Posts: 423
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetSandMan View Post
Do the Automatics tend to be faster than the 6-Speed ones?
just as viper said...the autos are the ones turning the best times. the 6 speeds are a bitch to launch right.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetSandMan View Post
The Challenger is the other car that I have in consideration...It's not as fast as its competitors...but my God the Hemi sounds like the most beautiful thing ever. Plus the Challenger is hands down the best looking of the 3 current muscle cars.
power can always be added!
__________________
a few mods:
-180* Jet t-stat
-Amsoil Eaa drop in filter
-HopNot total package
-275/50-17 M&H drag radials on mustang cobra r's for track days
future mods:
-hurst shifter
-exhaust
-custom tune
-driver mod
mjf6866 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2010, 11:27 AM   #34
SummitWhiteLS
 
SummitWhiteLS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Mustang V6 Automatic
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 657
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrray13 View Post
... We have a local R/T that can't beat a bone stock 2LT for nothing. He's tried repeatily, and no go as of yet.


Inside Line's review of the R/T was part of a 3 way test against the 2010 Stang and the Camaro SS.

They were able to turn a very respectable 1/4 mile time of 13.5 for the Stang and 13.0 for the SS, so they clearly have people who know how to drive. And they only got a 13.9 quarter with the R/T.

Their slalom testing showed the R/T to be 4mph slower than the SS's and the GT's (and about 1.5 mph slower than a v6 Camaro).

Just don't try and turn in a R/T!
SummitWhiteLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2010, 02:19 PM   #35
mjf6866
 
mjf6866's Avatar
 
Drives: 09 Challenger R/T 6-speed 3.92 rear
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: sitting on an angry chair with angry walls that steal the air
Posts: 423
Quote:
Originally Posted by SummitWhiteLS View Post


Inside Line's review of the R/T was part of a 3 way test against the 2010 Stang and the Camaro SS.

They were able to turn a very respectable 1/4 mile time of 13.5 for the Stang and 13.0 for the SS, so they clearly have people who know how to drive. And they only got a 13.9 quarter with the R/T.

Their slalom testing showed the R/T to be 4mph slower than the SS's and the GT's (and about 1.5 mph slower than a v6 Camaro).

Just don't try and turn in a R/T!
link? the only one i've seen is the "first test" from inside line which only has the R/T and they are running it at what looks like an airport runway. do they run all 3 cars on the same day with the same driver?

and why does vipertomcat's posted timeslips always get ignored and forgotten?

people are running low-mid 13's in stock R/Ts. i like when people pick the slowest posted times and go with them.
__________________
a few mods:
-180* Jet t-stat
-Amsoil Eaa drop in filter
-HopNot total package
-275/50-17 M&H drag radials on mustang cobra r's for track days
future mods:
-hurst shifter
-exhaust
-custom tune
-driver mod

Last edited by mjf6866; 05-31-2010 at 02:32 PM.
mjf6866 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2010, 04:02 PM   #36
THE EVIL TW1N
Banned
 
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViperTomcat View Post
It wont be close at all if the cars leave at the same time, the two may be neck and neck for a second or so.
I completely disagree with you. I think it'll be close for about two seconds.
THE EVIL TW1N is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2010, 10:38 AM   #37
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by SummitWhiteLS View Post


Inside Line's review of the R/T was part of a 3 way test against the 2010 Stang and the Camaro SS.

They were able to turn a very respectable 1/4 mile time of 13.5 for the Stang and 13.0 for the SS, so they clearly have people who know how to drive. And they only got a 13.9 quarter with the R/T.

Their slalom testing showed the R/T to be 4mph slower than the SS's and the GT's (and about 1.5 mph slower than a v6 Camaro).

Just don't try and turn in a R/T!
Try driving an R/T you may be more than a little surprised at the go and turn it is capable of...... Anywho, I believe I remember the article you speak of and it was an SRT, a sick SRT that had some kind of engine issue and even they stated they had gotten a 13.1 or 13.2 out of the SRT8, think is was missing or something to that effect
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2010, 10:48 AM   #38
1bad65
Banned
 
Drives: 2007 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
Anywho, I believe I remember the article you speak of and it was an SRT, a sick SRT that had some kind of engine issue and even they stated they had gotten a 13.1 or 13.2 out of the SRT8, think is was missing or something to that effect
They had a #7 cylinder misfire issue with the early 6-speed equipped SRTs. I read on a Challenger site it affected about 1 in 6 of the 6-speed SRTs.
1bad65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2010, 06:05 PM   #39
IDMTfirefighter
 
IDMTfirefighter's Avatar
 
Drives: 2009 Dodge Challenger
Join Date: May 2010
Location: illinois
Posts: 40
Not a camaro bash but no V6 Camaro is going to beat a R/T Challenger unless the R/T driver is blind and missing both arms.

And yes I do know that stock for stock V6 camaros and mustangs will beat V6 challengers. We won't be competitive, possibly, until the new pentastar comes out. Maybe not even then depending on new HP and torque and weight is still an issue comparitively
__________________
Honor God, love your woman, defend your country!
USAF AC-130 Gunship...you can run but you''ll just die tired!
The combat medic...next to God a grunts best friend!

MODS: CUDA style hockey stick graphics, K&N drop in, custom 9-11-01 Nose Badge, MOPAR hood struts, MOPAR pedal dress up, chrome fuel fill door, Debadged grill, Jones Full Boar Muffler w/Resonator delete, Chrome exhaust tip, DIY eng compartment dress up, Custom 3.5L High Output hood badges
IDMTfirefighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2010, 06:25 PM   #40
REEFBLUE93
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 1993 Rustang
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 941
Some of you people that are talking about V6 Camaros staying a car length behind "place your favorite V8 muscle car here" do realize that would put the Camaro right on the back bumper of the other car, right? A car length is just what it says. If you're getting beaten and the distance between your front bumper and the assailant's back bumper is a car length or more, you're getting beaten by two or more car lengths.
REEFBLUE93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2010, 06:27 PM   #41
2SSARMY
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 1,125
Stop comparing the R/T to the SS. Might be same price bracket but that's cheating. R/T needs a few mods to keep up with stock SS. SRT8, although way up there in price, is what should be compared to the SS and GT.
2SSARMY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2010, 06:28 PM   #42
2SSARMY
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 1,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjf6866 View Post

people are running low-mid 13's in stock R/Ts. i like when people pick the slowest posted times and go with them.
Are they running at the best tracks in negative DA???? The only stock R/T I ever saw hit 13.8 once and was running straight 14.0-14.1.
2SSARMY is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CAMARO WIKI Tran Wiki 67 11-27-2024 09:02 AM
Think about this and the Z28 5th gen 13F20 Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics 41 09-04-2010 01:59 AM
Installation Camaro Needed for Manual for a Justice Install Package in SF Bay Area Info@PeddersUSA.com USA - California 6 04-30-2010 09:02 PM
The DEFINITIVE EXPLANATION OF CAMARO SUSPENSION, ISSUES, AND UPGRADES Info@PeddersUSA.com Suspension / Brakes / Chassis 106 10-19-2009 07:08 PM
Camaro RS vs Challenger R/T KatarHol Chevy Camaro vs... 141 11-28-2008 05:28 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.