Mustangs................

[DeathChill]

I really liked their stats layout stuff. Easy access to a lot of information about the car without needing to search.

[Z/28orSs]

does it really matter what the stang can do ??
do we really care here at CAMARO5.

[fdjizm]

Originally Posted by GM-REX

Don't know. I've seen many stock GT's struggle to break 14sec. Depends on who's driving and other factors. Should it be capable of better numbers? Yes, I would think so. But for consistency's sake I stuck with the same magazine. If you want to use Hennessey for your Camaro numbers go ahead. But stick with all his tests then. Don't go showing me 60ft times from so and so, 1/8mi times from another source, and 1/4mi times from yet another.

no i would not stick with such a low number that would be purposely downplaying the cars true performance for arguements sake, and that is just silly. and i know the camaro is capable of more so hennesseys numbers are out the window for me.

i'm not sure where you have seen stock gt's truggle to hit 14. that is interesting stuff

[Z/28orSs]

Originally Posted by fdjizm

wow. ok.. lol i'm sorry you havent seen more runs and no i would not stick with such a low number that would be purposely downlplaying the cars true performance for arguements sake, and that is just silly.

i'm not sure where you have seen stock gt's truggle to hit 14. that is interesting stuff

I see them all the time at raceway park???

[fdjizm]

Originally Posted by Z/28orSs

I see them all the time at raceway park???

well someone needs driving lessons then i think you can hit a 13.8 by accident in an 05-09 gt

[levi1922]

Originally Posted by fdjizm

well someone needs driving lessons then i think you can hit a 13.8 by accident in an 05-09 gt

13.8 is ALL that r&t could get out of a 2010

and, im just sticking with road and track because thats what we have been using, i did not dive for that number.

[Z/28orSs]

Originally Posted by fdjizm

well someone needs driving lessons then i think you can hit a 13.8 by accident in an 05-09 gt

BUT the 5.0s and the cobra's kick ass !

[GM-REX]

Originally Posted by fdjizm

no i would not stick with such a low number that would be purposely downplaying the cars true performance for arguements sake, and that is just silly.

Oh...with DA of 0ft, perfect track, John Force behind the wheel, lunar eclipse...everything perfect lets see what these monsters do. Not trying to be an ass, but I laugh at the people who tell me what something is capable of. It's like everyone saying the new Camaro is a 12.8 or 12.9 car stock. C'mon lets talk day to day here not the golden run. The other people I like are the ones who post everyone else's time slips to brag about their car to say what it's capable of.

And you're right those people do need driving lessons, but lets face it. Not everyone is a skilled track driver.

[GM-REX]

Originally Posted by levi1922

yeahhh, that is what i was saying

I know, I was just adding a little more info.

[truth411]

Originally Posted by fdjizm

well someone needs driving lessons then i think you can hit a 13.8 by accident in an 05-09 gt

The best times I have seen personaly for 05-09 mustangs that are stock are high 13's in the 1/4 mile. That is nothing to be ashamed of, Did not all the car mags get like 13.7s for the 2010 mustang without the track pack??

[z06invb]

One Mustang that gets forgotten is the 03 04 Mach 1. I had a 03 and was impressed with it. I hit 13.26 @106.26 with it bone stock. With a couple mods and drag radials it was easily in the 12's.

[Rock36]

Originally Posted by fdjizm

if so could you explain how a bolt on gt with about 315 hp to the ground runs 12.6@108mph?

Exactly... I've run 13.011 @ 105 mph at a track elevation of 1250' with a DA of ~1800', and I am dyno tuned at 314 rwhp (still N/A).

That is my best time, but certainly not the only time I have run a 13.0X, and I hit 13.1 quite often. Adjusting for altitude and good air alone would put me right in the high 12s with my tiny 4.6L 3 valve.

I still want the timeslip though....

[Sleestack]

Originally Posted by Rock36

Exactly... I've run 13.011 @ 105 mph at a track elevation of 1250' with a DA of ~1800', and I am dyno tuned at 314 rwhp (still N/A).

That is my best time, but certainly not the only time I have run a 13.0X, and I hit 13.1 quite often. Adjusting for altitude and good air alone would put me right in the high 12s with my tiny 4.6L 3 valve.

I still want the timeslip though....

What mods for the 13.0 run? 60' time?

[fdjizm]

Originally Posted by Rock36

Exactly... I've run 13.011 @ 105 mph at a track elevation of 1250' with a DA of ~1800', and I am dyno tuned at 314 rwhp (still N/A).

That is my best time, but certainly not the only time I have run a 13.0X, and I hit 13.1 quite often. Adjusting for altitude and good air alone would put me right in the high 12s with my tiny 4.6L 3 valve.

I still want the timeslip though....

Well sir knowing that all gt's struggle to hit 14's i would have to call you a liar on behalf of the camaro5 forums