11.8 @ 122 mph

[tpower]

Mine is a auto , I tried shifiting a few runs

[SC2150]

Excellent!!! Trap speed and car weight and 60' all come into play, as well as where the car is making the power. I see roots type blowers with quick ET's and lower trap speeds, and the opposite on some turbo cars.

Get that 60" down a few tenths and the ET will drop half second or more.

What trans do you have? Suspension mods?

[tpower]

Auto no mods on suspension

[Bolt-onC6]

Originally Posted by tpower

Mine is a auto , I tried shifiting a few runs

Do you have an HP Tuner log of one of your passes? I've looked at the manual table. If about the same at the lower cyl airmass g/cyl frames as the auto then you can add some advance to help that 60' somewhat. It would take a looser converter for real gains. You are making enough power for a 1.6 or better 60'.

[Camarowguy]

Originally Posted by Turbo99

I hear this from a few people on hear and I have to disagree, I make 640rwhp and my best trap is 126 so far I am a stick car and would say it could prolly get a 128mph trap but I don't see a 130+ trap from my car either, but it is hot here in Fl. too but I have a chiller and rarley see my car pull timing.

So let's look at it this way. I trap 112mph with a few bolt ons. Stock rims, stock tires, no weight reduction. I'm making prolly around 360-370rwhp. So what your telling me is I'd have to increase my rwhp by 230 to trap a measly 10mph higher. I don't think so myself.

[Bolt-onC6]

Originally Posted by tpower

yes 601 rwhp

Originally Posted by tpower

Auto no mods on suspension

No mods and you are making 601 rwhp?

[Camarowguy]

Originally Posted by Bolt-onC6

No mods and you are making 601 rwhp?

No mods on suspension.....

[Bolt-onC6]

Originally Posted by Camarowguy

No mods on suspension.....

I better read a little closer in the future! Duh...

[Supercharged SS]

Originally Posted by Camarowguy

So let's look at it this way. I trap 112mph with a few bolt ons. Stock rims, stock tires, no weight reduction. I'm making prolly around 360-370rwhp. So what your telling me is I'd have to increase my rwhp by 230 to trap a measly 10mph higher. I don't think so myself.

My car trapped 113 with 368 rwhp and 124.83 with 545rwhp. So roughly 177 rwhp to gain 12 mph. It's pretty much how it goes. It took another 160 rwhp to get another 11 mph.

[tpower]

I think I can pick up alot once I get a better RT & 60' time

[Bolt-onC6]

Originally Posted by tpower

I think I can pick up alot once I get a better RT & 60' time

Reaction time doesn't have anything to do with et but yes a better 60' will greatly improve your times. I ran a 10.77 at 122.64 mph in my 98 Camaro. You could do about the same with the right converter.

[tpower]

Originally Posted by Bolt-onC6

Reaction time doesn't have anything to do with et but yes a better 60' will greatly improve your times. I ran a 10.77 at 122.64 mph in my 98 Camaro. You could do about the same with the right converter.

Problem is the convertor I still want to road race the car not sure how that will effect the car

[Bolt-onC6]

Originally Posted by tpower

Problem is the convertor I still want to road race the car not sure how that will effect the car

Whoops! Got to buy another ZL1r then. A manual tranny is best for road racing.

[tpower]

Originally Posted by Bolt-onC6

Whoops! Got to buy another ZL1r then. A manual tranny is best for road racing.

Just bought the wife a CTS V picking it up tuesday maybe I will road race that