Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-26-2013, 09:15 AM   #29
Kelly@PCMofNC
 
Drives: 2010 RS/SS
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 968
Dang, I just posted a reply and it disappeared. I was asking what your goals were for the car HP wise, and how do you use it - street car, race car, fun car, etc?
Kelly@PCMofNC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 09:16 AM   #30
mcdoogle6969

 
mcdoogle6969's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS, 2008 Heritage 300C
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by sliding View Post
If you are having Tuning problems with the older style KB intake tube. Contact KB and they will sort you out with a new tube with the Maf sensor relocated and a honey comp insert all at know charge. At least that's what they did for me Saved me spending any money with any suppliers.
Did that, still caused problems and it toasted 2nd gear. The honeycomb design that they send ya is a bandaid, not a fix.

I love my KB, I just wasn't happy with the results of having to rebuild the tranny because their Customer Service sent me something they claimed to be something that it's not. A fix.

JRE's custom 4" intake tube is going to be in my first round of parts orders that I send out for my new build. I've talked with Ted, and about his experiences with similar setups and I have full faith that this is a true fix.
__________________

Last edited by mcdoogle6969; 01-26-2013 at 10:53 AM.
mcdoogle6969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 10:22 AM   #31
mikepage0007


 
mikepage0007's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 camaro
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: port st lucie ,florida
Posts: 4,273
also ran a kb and had 0 issues..iats are def hotter, but unless you are building a track car the iats are gonna make 0 difference ..i dyno tuned 560rwhp with 100% stock ls3-no headers completely stock and mike norris tuned...in florida in july at 97 degrees and 100% humidity...ended up getting 700 with a meth kit and blower cam and 10psi
__________________
mikepage0007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 10:29 AM   #32
mcdoogle6969

 
mcdoogle6969's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS, 2008 Heritage 300C
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikepage0007 View Post
also ran a kb and had 0 issues..iats are def hotter, but unless you are building a track car the iats are gonna make 0 difference ..i dyno tuned 560rwhp with 100% stock ls3-no headers completely stock and mike norris tuned...in florida in july at 97 degrees and 100% humidity...ended up getting 700 with a meth kit and blower cam and 10psi
You have a M6 right? Only A6's get these intake issues I believe.
__________________
mcdoogle6969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 11:09 AM   #33
mikepage0007


 
mikepage0007's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 camaro
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: port st lucie ,florida
Posts: 4,273
correct, m6..
__________________
mikepage0007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 11:12 AM   #34
Unreal


 
Drives: 2006 Z06
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 5,712
Local car is making 820+rwhp through an auto with one. Only issues is the tranny doesn't like all the torque. I know 5.0s are making 620-640rwhp with KBs just bolted on.
__________________
Nick
Corvette Z06 -1200ish rwhp
Unreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 11:17 AM   #35
mcdoogle6969

 
mcdoogle6969's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS, 2008 Heritage 300C
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,911
The stock intake is too big, messes with the MAF and screws with the trans tables (again, through a A6). The delay that it caused was actually so bad that when we would make a shift point at around 6500 it would rev out past 7200+ and I'd instantly let off, I didn't want to find out if it would end up finally shifting. (we played with different shift points and still had the same problem). Then if you have the rev limiter set to 6800 or whatever else, it would just bang against that and not shift. My car didn't experience these problems until after the KB install, and when KB sent the honeycomb and ect, same problems persisted and that's when 2nd gear went bye-bye (so much for that being the fix eh?). There was a thread about this very issue a long time ago.

Again, I love my KB (power and looks) but it's upsetting to just bolt on the kit and have it piss out second gear before even being able to enjoy a FI car. If I would have known that before hand, I would have went with a Whipple or TVS2300 because you don't hear about any similar issues with those.

OP wanted to know some positives and negatives about this blower, I'm just giving the guy what he asked for. It's important to let people know about these issues than to throw it under a rug somewhere to try and hide it like it's not a problem.
__________________

Last edited by mcdoogle6969; 01-26-2013 at 12:09 PM.
mcdoogle6969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 07:49 PM   #36
G200 Pilot
G200 Pilot
 
G200 Pilot's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS purchased 5/2010
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Port St Lucie, FL
Posts: 597
Quote:
Originally Posted by OscarsG5 View Post
Guys I think there's enough hair pulling on the other thread. Iam just looking for some feed back from anybody who's ever dealt with a KB SC? Lets keep the Arguing out! Thanks
I've owned the 2.8LC in the recent past and got rid of it... IAT's are extremely unacceptable. Besides, KB has horrible support and offered a lot of lip service when we complained about the IAT's . I wouldn't do it if I were you...
__________________
G200 Pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 09:53 PM   #37
mcdoogle6969

 
mcdoogle6969's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS, 2008 Heritage 300C
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by G200 Pilot View Post
I've owned the 2.8LC in the recent past and got rid of it... IAT's are extremely unacceptable. Besides, KB has horrible support and offered a lot of lip service when we complained about the IAT's . I wouldn't do it if I were you...
Again unless you're serious into tracking it constantly, IAT's are NOT that big of a deal on the streets because EVERY blower will heat soak after driving it around. Also, if you really check the IAT's of the KB to other PD blowers their much closer than you think.
__________________
mcdoogle6969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013, 10:48 AM   #38
47AJV8
 
Drives: A White Car
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 342
I was looking into actually getting a KB, but thank god I was on this forum and saw people complaining about the IATs or else I would have got one and then been P.O. I have 0 intention of running meth/water so high IATs are definitely a deal breaker for me. I mean don't get me wrong, KB is beautiful and makes good numbers, but I think whipple is more logical.
__________________
"From ABS shudder that came on surprisingly early in the lousy brake pedal's travel to a looser rear end than Kim Kardashian"
47AJV8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 06:10 PM   #39
mcdoogle6969

 
mcdoogle6969's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS, 2008 Heritage 300C
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,911
Again, unless you are into SERIOUS tracking all the time IAT's are not an issue with the KB, and even if you were into serious tracking the difference between the blowers are pretty damn close, and again if your serious about tracking you probably will get meth, HE upgrade, or chiller on any blower you pick which would void the whole IAT argument anyways. EVERY. SINGLE. SUPERCHARGER. WILL. HEAT. SOAK. on the streets. So if a street car is all it's going to be, pick what you like the best because you won't notice the IAT's.


People who go "Bah IAT's are too high on the KB, their crap" are either 1) uneducated about the KB and other PD blowers. Or 2) a troll.
__________________
mcdoogle6969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 08:03 PM   #40
G200 Pilot
G200 Pilot
 
G200 Pilot's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS purchased 5/2010
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Port St Lucie, FL
Posts: 597
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcdoogle6969 View Post
Again, unless you are into SERIOUS tracking all the time IAT's are not an issue with the KB, and even if you were into serious tracking the difference between the blowers are pretty damn close, and again if your serious about tracking you probably will get meth, HE upgrade, or chiller on any blower you pick which would void the whole IAT argument anyways. EVERY. SINGLE. SUPERCHARGER. WILL. HEAT. SOAK. on the streets. So if a street car is all it's going to be, pick what you like the best because you won't notice the IAT's.


People who go "Bah IAT's are too high on the KB, their crap" are either 1) uneducated about the KB and other PD blowers. Or 2) a troll.
I beg to differ with you... Do you own or have you owned a KB LC 2.8? Please tell us about your "track experience" . Also, tell us about your experience with their customer service if you're going to pontificate...
__________________
G200 Pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 08:30 PM   #41
Ryne @ CMS
 
Ryne @ CMS's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 06 C6 Z06, 15 Sierra
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Murrieta, CA
Posts: 778
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcdoogle6969 View Post
The stock intake is too big, messes with the MAF and screws with the trans tables (again, through a A6). The delay that it caused was actually so bad that when we would make a shift point at around 6500 it would rev out past 7200+ and I'd instantly let off, I didn't want to find out if it would end up finally shifting. (we played with different shift points and still had the same problem). Then if you have the rev limiter set to 6800 or whatever else, it would just bang against that and not shift. My car didn't experience these problems until after the KB install, and when KB sent the honeycomb and ect, same problems persisted and that's when 2nd gear went bye-bye (so much for that being the fix eh?). There was a thread about this very issue a long time ago.

Again, I love my KB (power and looks) but it's upsetting to just bolt on the kit and have it piss out second gear before even being able to enjoy a FI car. If I would have known that before hand, I would have went with a Whipple or TVS2300 because you don't hear about any similar issues with those.

OP wanted to know some positives and negatives about this blower, I'm just giving the guy what he asked for. It's important to let people know about these issues than to throw it under a rug somewhere to try and hide it like it's not a problem.
a lot of your issues seem to come from poor tuning in my opinion...
Ryne @ CMS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013, 07:15 AM   #42
mcdoogle6969

 
mcdoogle6969's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS, 2008 Heritage 300C
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by G200 Pilot View Post
I beg to differ with you... Do you own or have you owned a KB LC 2.8? Please tell us about your "track experience" . Also, tell us about your experience with their customer service if you're going to pontificate...
Nope I don't own one, the pictures I posted above in an earlier post is of somebody else that I'm claiming to be mine.

Obviously you didn't read my previous post, AT ALL.

Are you trying to tell me that other blowers won't heat soak, or climb to high IAT's while driving on the streets/constant track use?
__________________
mcdoogle6969 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.