Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-30-2017, 03:40 PM   #15
frenchsquared

 
frenchsquared's Avatar
 
Drives: 15 Z28, 01 Corvette, 96 Corvette
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Colorado
Posts: 863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwright View Post
I just finished my build and will tell you on forced induction 3:91 aren't the way to go. It's fun has hell but I don't think I will ever get it to hook. You would be spinning all the way down the track. At this point I don't even think drag radials will cure it. It would help but. After first hand experience I can't see 3:91 under fi working very well
Yep... My Vette destroys the tires. I doubt a Camaro is any different.
__________________
2018 Sierra RCSB | 2015 Z28 Camaro | 1989 B2200 with a 327 | 1996 LT4 Z51 Corvette | 1973 427 Nova
frenchsquared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2017, 09:56 AM   #16
2012LS3VERT

 
Drives: 2012 2SSRS Vert, Black w/M6
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 1,265
A deep gear with a Centri blower or larger turbos could be just fine on a tall drag radial. My Maggie car with 3.73s will fairly easily destroy a set of 305/45R18 ET Street Rs. That's a 29" tall tire. Maybe with a 15" wheel it may be ok and really get the car going out of the hole, but I'm not a fan of 15" conversions on a car that sees a lot of street time, personal preference.
2012LS3VERT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2017, 11:06 AM   #17
fif_gen_powa

 
fif_gen_powa's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro SS Turbo
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,525
Making high 600s My car was faster at the track with 3.91 gears than a 3.45 and traction was not an issue with an 18 inch drag radial. The 3.45 rear in forth gear can reach 160 mph around 6500 rpm it is not optimal for a sub 1000hp car which will not trap anywhere near that mph.

3.91 gears did make traction on the street pretty tough anything under 60mph would spin but at the track the car had zero issues with spinning. Any car 700 to maybe 750ish and under strictly a quarter mile car 3.91 would be perfect, 3.73 for 800+, I believe you need to make 1000+ to utilize the super long 3.45 forth gear

This is on a SS manual trans car IMO
__________________
388ci 91/104 Turbo TH400
8.3@164
https://instagram.com/turbo_ls3/
fif_gen_powa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2017, 11:29 AM   #18
2012LS3VERT

 
Drives: 2012 2SSRS Vert, Black w/M6
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 1,265
Many times it comes down to individual car setup. A large cam car with a centri or large turbo will tolerate a much lower gear than a TVS2300 car. Even a Whipple doesn't come on as hard as a TVS2300. A 6L80E car also will not tolerate as low of a gear as a manual especially with a high stall, as the 4.02 first gear is pretty deep compared to the 3.01 of a Manual SS, or the 2.66 in the ZL1. I have run the stock SS 3.45, the 1LE 3.91, then the ZL1 3.73s. I am eventually going to swap in the ZL1 3.27 gears, the 3.73s are way too deep on street, where my car is most of the time with a much shorter tire than my drag radials. I also have done many diff swaps and regears in customer cars, what I recommend depends on goals and car setup. All the power in the world won't do anyone any good if you can't put it to the ground effectively, so all variables need to be taken into account.
2012LS3VERT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2017, 11:33 AM   #19
fif_gen_powa

 
fif_gen_powa's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro SS Turbo
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,525
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2012LS3VERT View Post
Many times it comes down to individual car setup. A large cam car with a centri or large turbo will tolerate a much lower gear than a TVS2300 car. Even a Whipple doesn't come on as hard as a TVS2300. A 6L80E car also will not tolerate as low of a gear as a manual especially with a high stall, as the 4.02 first gear is pretty deep compared to the 3.01 of a Manual SS, or the 2.66 in the ZL1. I have run the stock SS 3.45, the 1LE 3.91, then the ZL1 3.73s. I am eventually going to swap in the ZL1 3.27 gears, the 3.73s are way too deep on street, where my car is most of the time with a much shorter tire than my drag radials. I also have done many diff swaps and regears in customer cars, what I recommend depends on goals and car setup. All the power in the world won't do anyone any good if you can't put it to the ground effectively, so all variables need to be taken into account.
Well said, totally agree, I just see a lot of guys shy away from the 3.91 because of hearsay when in reality they will be optimal for quarter mile drag times
__________________
388ci 91/104 Turbo TH400
8.3@164
https://instagram.com/turbo_ls3/
fif_gen_powa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2017, 12:04 PM   #20
dreksnot
Served USN - Atomic Chimp
 
dreksnot's Avatar
 
Drives: 2021 Camaro ZL1 1LE A10 (stock)
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 1,710
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2012LS3VERT View Post
Many times it comes down to individual car setup. A large cam car with a centri or large turbo will tolerate a much lower gear than a TVS2300 car. Even a Whipple doesn't come on as hard as a TVS2300. A 6L80E car also will not tolerate as low of a gear as a manual especially with a high stall, as the 4.02 first gear is pretty deep compared to the 3.01 of a Manual SS, or the 2.66 in the ZL1. I have run the stock SS 3.45, the 1LE 3.91, then the ZL1 3.73s. I am eventually going to swap in the ZL1 3.27 gears, the 3.73s are way too deep on street, where my car is most of the time with a much shorter tire than my drag radials. I also have done many diff swaps and regears in customer cars, what I recommend depends on goals and car setup. All the power in the world won't do anyone any good if you can't put it to the ground effectively, so all variables need to be taken into account.
I, too, have been there, done that with the 3.45, 3.73 and 3.23. Per some intense "bench racing" software apps, I was suppose to gain a whole tenth of a second going from the 3.73 to the 3.23 with my TT setup. Not sure how well that worked out as I change more than one parameter at a time, but I can tell you it didn't hurt. It was much easier to overpower the DRs off the line with the 3.73 than the 3.23 (but it can still be done pretty easy if I'm not paying attention). The usual statement goes into play - YMMV. I run with some built SC Camaros running 3.73 and they scream down the strip.
__________________
>
> 2021 Camaro ZL1 1LE A10
>
> Past Builds: 2013 Twin-Turbo LSX434 M6 - 1,359rwhp daily
dreksnot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2017, 12:27 PM   #21
fif_gen_powa

 
fif_gen_powa's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro SS Turbo
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,525
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreksnot View Post
I, too, have been there, done that with the 3.45, 3.73 and 3.23. Per some intense "bench racing" software apps, I was suppose to gain a whole tenth of a second going from the 3.73 to the 3.23 with my TT setup. Not sure how well that worked out as I change more than one parameter at a time, but I can tell you it didn't hurt. It was much easier to overpower the DRs off the line with the 3.73 than the 3.23 (but it can still be done pretty easy if I'm not paying attention). The usual statement goes into play - YMMV. I run with some built SC Camaros running 3.73 and they scream down the strip.
Couldn't imagine running the 3.23 on the strip but can't argue with real world data. I actually lost one tenth and two mph going from 3.91 to 3.45
__________________
388ci 91/104 Turbo TH400
8.3@164
https://instagram.com/turbo_ls3/
fif_gen_powa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2017, 03:12 PM   #22
fldrummer
"Black Ace"
 
fldrummer's Avatar
 
Drives: Supercharged 2010 SS, 2016 Golf R
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 1,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by fif_gen_powa View Post
Well said, totally agree, I just see a lot of guys shy away from the 3.91 because of hearsay when in reality they will be optimal for quarter mile drag times
Yeah, 2012LS3VERT beat me to it. Even with my [sh*tty] current tune in the low-600s, I easily & accidentally broke my 325/40/18 M&H Racemasters loose from a stop, and that's running a 3.73 ZL1 diff. Even back when I was making 60 rwhp less, you can imagine how crazy it was running 4.10s with street tires, before they finally broke!
__________________
2010 2SS/RS M6 "Black Ace" - Delivered 6/4/2009
Mods: Forged 416 LS3, Maggie TVS 2300 SC (~11 psi), custom cam (232/247, .630/.630, 118 LSA), 90-lb. injectors, ZL1 fuel pump & ADM controller, Alky Control meth kit, Monster LT1-SC twin-disk clutch, ZL1 drivetrain conversion w/ DSS 1000-HP axles & 1-pc. driveshaft, CAI Inc. intake w/ ADM scoop, XS Power full exhaust (1 7/8" LT headers with 3" off-road pipes), VMAX CNC-ported TB, LSR adjustable sway bars, LPE rear end-links, BMR 1" drop, BMR polyurethane bushings; UMI trailing arms & toe rods. Built & tuned by Kraftworks. 755 rwhp/708 rwtq
fldrummer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2017, 03:23 PM   #23
dreksnot
Served USN - Atomic Chimp
 
dreksnot's Avatar
 
Drives: 2021 Camaro ZL1 1LE A10 (stock)
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 1,710
I finally stopped dumping the clutch and easing it out - makes for a much better 60 and no/less spinning. Clutch doesn't like it much though.
__________________
>
> 2021 Camaro ZL1 1LE A10
>
> Past Builds: 2013 Twin-Turbo LSX434 M6 - 1,359rwhp daily
dreksnot is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.