![]() |
|
|
#15 | ||
![]() Drives: Bird Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 266
|
Quote:
Quote:
The causes for an iced evaporator would be either a low heat load or an undercharged system. Going to generalize a lot here to get the point across, usually for medium temperature applications you're shooting for the temperature of the refrigerant in the evaporator to be around 40*f, more specifically you're looking at the temperature of the refrigerant in the evaporator to be 40*f lower than the temperature of the air coming into it. When a system is undercharged it will have a lower pressure than it is designed for, and that lower pressure will translate into lower temperature, which can cause the evaporator to ice up (to a point, too low of a charge will not be capable of exchanging heat). If a system designed to have an evaporator temperature of 40*f loses some refrigerant, the lower pressure can reduce the evaporator temperature to below 32*f/freezing, and cause the moisture in the air to freeze on the evaporator. If this were the case you would notice two things- for one due to the reduced amount of refrigerant in the system, there would be a reduced amount of heat that could be transferred, and the A/C would consistently take notably longer to cool the air in the car. Second, once cooled, the evaporator would freeze over on a regular basis. Seeing as how this happened once last summer on a road trip, I doubt it would be the case. That leaves a low heat load. High temperatures will only prevent an evaporator from freezing over. Humidity can have an effect, in a specific situation. The air passing through the evaporator has a large effect on the condition of the refrigerant inside the A/C system. Warmer air will transfer more heat, causing higher refrigerant temperatures in the evaporator, and vice-versa for colder air. Like stated before, generally the temperature of the refrigerant in the evaporator will be 40* below the temperature of the air passing through it. So if you have 80*f air entering the evaporator, the temperature of refrigerant in the evaporator will be 40*f (once again this is a somewhat reliable generalization). This also means that if you have 70*f air entering the evaporator, the temperature of refrigerant in the evaporator will be 30*f, below freezing. Now add into the fact that you're driving a 2010 Camaro- the interior is extremely well insulated, and the evaporator is equally as insulated, if not more. You were on a road trip in the summer from Atlanta to Dallas, don't think I'd be too far off to guess if I said you probably had the A/C blasting, with the air on recirculation (that's what I'd do). I'd be willing to bet the temperature of the air in the car was 70*f, if not as low as 65*f, to compensate for radiant heat from the sun. That means the temperature of refrigerant in the evaporator was from 25*f-30*f for at least a couple hours between stops. Add in the extremely high humidity you'll find between Atlanta and Dallas and that transfers into a huge amount of ice freezing on your evaporator. What happened was most likely the nature of how your A/C system works, and if it only happened on a long road trip means that your car is very well insulated and your A/C is working correctly. The only way to prevent this is to bring warmer air in over the evaporator so the temperature does not go below freezing- turn off recirculation/max A/C to bring in some warmer outside air, or turn the temperature control slightly up to warm up the recirculated air. Another thing to consider is radiant heat from the sun. Radiant heat does not heat air, but it does heat up surfaces inside the car, including your clothes and skin, so sunlight will make you feel like it's warmer than the actual temperature of the air in the car. If you don't have window tint already, putting some on will reduce this effect and allow you to not adjust your A/C as cold and prevent it from icing up. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 33
|
Wow! That's a well thought-out reply! Thank you for taking the time to
generate such a great explanation.. I generally don't use the A/C unless it's absolutely necessary. Do you think I would have experienced this icing if I had the temp control on Max but the fan on one of the lowest settings? I seem to remember that I had forgot that it was on the Max setting (the one that has an additional click when you turn the temp dial counter-clockwise). I remember also that the outside temp was hovering around 90 degrees. If I read your post correctly, in high-humidity, high-temp conditions, the evaporator can ice over quicker if I have the "recirc" on for extended periods of time? In that case, it would be an easy fix. :-) Since as you say the car is extremely well insulated, I can put it on recirc until it cools off, then turn the recirc off. And keep it off "Max" :-) Thanks again for your thoughtful reply! |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
![]() |
Quote:
Having lived in Indiana, Wisconsin, Kansas and Arizona, I have never been to a quick lube where I get to stay in my car while they do the oil change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
![]() Drives: Bird Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 266
|
Quote:
My advice is exactly what you said, turn the recirculation off on longer trips, try and find a happy medium to where you are comfortable, but not cycling the exact same cold air over the evaporator the whole time. And if you aren't going to be in the car for anytime longer than a couple hours I wouldn't even worry about it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 33
|
Quote:
![]() It must be a Michigan thing.... I grew up in Flint, lived in Detroit suburbs for a while and was never asked to step out of the car and wait in a room while someone changed my oil. I really miss the way they did things up there. While still in the car, they'd change the oil, ask you to start it back up, and show you the oil level before you paid. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 67 Camaro Convertible Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 1,718
|
Quote:
There's a TSB that came out in June of 2009 for problem #1 #09-08-49-011: Instrument Panel Cluster (IPC) Needle(s) Stick Intermittently (Replace Instrument Panel Cluster) - (Jun 15, 2009) I would ask why would it need to be "verified" if it's already a known problem? The TSB says it's "intermittent".
__________________
_____________________________________________
2LT/RS RJT, Blk Rally Stripes, Beige Interior, SunroofPlaced order at dealer 4/24/09 1100 - 4/28/09 2000 - 5/01/09 2500 - 5/05/09 3000 - 5/05/09 3300 - 5/30/09 3400 - 6/05/09 3800 - 6/18/09 4000 - 6/18/09 4B00 - 6/18/09 4200 - 6/22/09 5000 - 7/01/09 6000 - 7/01/09 It's Home!! 0000 - 7/14/11 Traded in with 24,000 miles. Currently 5th Gen less |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() |
I am now a Chevy salesperson but used to be a Service Manager for a motorcycle dealership and the theory is the exact same as cars. I know it is frustrating to be told that a dealer can't fix something that they can't see wrong, but you have to see it from the dealer's side also. If you went to work every single day and were asked to go on a wild goose chase for free because the customer and the manufacturer both would not be willing to pay for your work, then you would have a problem with that, right? Let's say that what you experienced one time a week before, and never re-occured, happened to be a fluke mishap. Then how do you think that tech that took your entire dash apart to get to your gauges to ensure your needle wasn't over-tightened, will get paid when GM says there wasn't anything wrong with your gauge.
Trust me, I know how you feel. I took my Charger to Florida on vacation and the car decided it just wasn't going to start for over two and a half hours at the hotel when I was trying to leave. Dodge sent a truck out to pick up the car that still would not crank or do anything. Once it made it to the dealer it started right up. They kept it overnight to ensure it would start the next morning again, while I paid for another night at the hotel, and it did so they made me come pick it up. They couldn't duplicate the problem and they weren't willing to run a bunch of time consuming tests on a car that ran just fine. I didn't like it, but the car never ever acted up again in the entire 33000 miles that I owned it. That happened at 8200 miles. Like I said, it may have been a freak mishap and it won't happen again. Unfortunately these cars are mechanical and that happens sometimes. But a dealer won't rip into a car to fix a problem they can't prove it has. I'm pretty sure you wouldn't have been willing to pay for the hours of work when they found out that there wasn't anything wrong would you? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Are you a stupid [cable] customer? (BEWARE: sarcasm) | The_Blur | Off-topic Discussions | 32 | 03-16-2011 08:11 AM |
| Need help, weird vibration, very frustrated | lre107 | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 4 | 11-19-2009 01:36 PM |
| YOUR WARRANTY INFORMATION | Kwaz1335 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 2 | 11-02-2009 05:23 PM |
| Any dealers doing discounts yet? | Cyberfan | Camaro Price | Ordering | Tracking | Dealers Discussions | 7 | 07-29-2009 09:07 PM |
| GM Service Satisfaction | Mr. Wyndham | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 6 | 07-29-2008 02:50 PM |