![]() |
|
|
#883 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '10 CGM 2SS/RS 6M Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 1,032
|
If it were me and I was in the business to sell cars, I would definitely be trying to appease the masses not just the 5 or so on here that are lapping up the koolaid..do I sound butt hurt? Yup sure am, mainly because GM chose this route to make money and deal with CAFE. They had to go overboard and price high because if they had a 1LE with and LS7(with hot cam)@62K and call it a Z/28 they wouldn't be able to make enough of them for the next two years and their CAFE would go down the drain. I don't see how it costs more money to recertify an engine than it is to build all these specific parts for a car and test brakes, tires, etc. Like I said, if it were my business that is what I would do, and exploit the hell out of the Volt to make up the difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#884 | |
|
Hail to the King baby!
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,307
|
Quote:
Sorry just missing your point I guess.
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#885 | |
![]() Drives: 2012 Ram 1980 Malibu Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Otherside of the screen
Posts: 362
|
Quote:
GM is done losing money on cars. They built the Sky/Solstace and those if i remember correctly lost GM money on every sale. I think people would have been happy if the 1LE was the Z28 or Z/28. i don't think people would have bitched or moaned at all. Would people be happier if this new Z/28 would have been called a Camaro R? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#886 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 1970-1/2 Z-28, 2017 ZL1 Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sanford, Fl
Posts: 973
|
So, let me ask a simple question...everyone who loves the bowtie is happy that Chevy made the car that is called the Z/28, correct? If the answer is yes, is the only problem that most (ok some) have with the car is that it is called the Z/28? If THAT answer is yes, isn't that a little silly and childish? I mean, if you think the 1LE should have been what the Z/28 is....then get a 1LE. Right? I mean, are we so vain or nostalgic that we cannot move on from a 45 year old moniker? Are you buying the decal or what the decal is on? Seriously, to Col. Brains point, if the 1LE was called the Z/28 and the Z/28 was called the Camaro R, the world would be back in alignment? If it is that simple and those little things can ruin your view of the brand....you have bigger issues I think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#887 |
![]() ![]() |
Here you go......Again if you dont like what is going on please feel free to talk to your elected officals.
http://www.nhtsa.gov/cars/rules/import/fmvss/ Every new component has to be tested....One reason why the ZL1 front bumper did not change for the 14 my.. Now the new fenders, glass, rims, spoiler, hood, you get the picture has to go through alot of testing... And again you cannot just drop a LS7 into a 1LE and send it on its way....If anything changes on the car it has to be tested and tested and tested.... BTW for everyone that keeps saying just drop a LS7 into a 1LE I invite you to call any shop you want and get a price for the conversion...... |
|
|
|
|
|
#888 | ||
|
corner barstool sitter
Drives: 08 Mustang GT, 19 WRX Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Eastern Time Zone
Posts: 6,990
|
Quote:
However . . . such a Z/28 wouldn't have set the bar quite high enough (with the S550 on the horizon) and it'd still have been too much about "features" (for those who want a track day car without the frills). Quote:
Norm |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#889 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: BAC Mono Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Reno
Posts: 869
|
Quote:
If some of you are so f'ing selfish, self-centered and sheltered that you can't understand the importance of GM bringing new blood into the GM fold by conceptualizing and producing a very special upmarket car like the Z/28 for a hardcore group of enthusiasts, then that's "your" problem (not talking to you mkorgan , just to the folks who this applies to).
__________________
2014 Z/28, White
"I wasn't asked to make it cheap...I was asked to make it FAST!" Mark Stielow, the new Z/28. Last edited by Zfatuated; 01-09-2014 at 04:22 PM. Reason: fix my poor grammar! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#890 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2020 SS 1LE (previous: 2017 SS 1LE) Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Canada, eh!
Posts: 5,091
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#891 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,990
|
Quote:
Those people who drop Vette engines in Miatas don't have to deal with government regulations or guaranteeing their work for 10 years and 100k miles. GM has to test every part they put in a car to make sure it works. Spread that cost over a few cars and it drives the price up. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#892 |
|
corner barstool sitter
Drives: 08 Mustang GT, 19 WRX Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Eastern Time Zone
Posts: 6,990
|
It's also pretty late in the 5th gen product cycle, so the ability to amortize the extra costs over time and total units built is not as good as it is with the Stingray being at the beginning of its product cycle.
Norm |
|
|
|
|
|
#893 |
|
Downright Upright
Drives: Daily Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cruisin'...
Posts: 4,145
|
Still the same merry-go-round?
The bright shining beacon in all of this is, Gen-6 offers the promise/potential of MORE volume, with at the very least EQUAL performance, at potentially LESS dollar$ per Z/28 (slash present). Hopefully, there IS an -R option package for the next one. One that ADDS the R-compound tires and CC-brakes as an OPTION (and I hate to say this, publicly) similar in concept to the Base BOSS - LS duo that WAS offered from you-know-who... |
|
|
|
|
|
#894 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2020 SS 1LE (previous: 2017 SS 1LE) Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Canada, eh!
Posts: 5,091
|
I understand the amortization game. Yet the key parts are "bolt ons" not brand new components requiring tons of r+d, design, enngineering and testing. Case in point: the z06 engine, 3rd party suspension, 3rd party brakes, etc. Indeed it has to be tested as a package, but it is not even close to say developing a new motor. I don't dispute that the z28 has a lot of new (to Camaro) parts, but they are not necessarily "new".
I think it is misleading to suggest the car's price is high because of "testing". It is high because it is a limited production car with a limited target clientele. At this level it wouldn't matter if it cost 85Gs. I am sure GM would find 1000-1500 folks with fat wallets. Also, I have no respect for any product manager who is known by a quote: "they didn't ask me to make it cheap..they asked me to make it fast". Catchy quote? Yes, but it smacks of lack of respect for the working people. How different would would this quote sound if "cheap" got replaced with "affordable for loyal customers"?! |
|
|
|
|
|
#895 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2023 ZLE Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 1,717
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#896 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2020 SS 1LE (previous: 2017 SS 1LE) Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Canada, eh!
Posts: 5,091
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|