![]() |
|
|
#29 |
![]() |
I was out of the country for the month of May but when I came back in June, I've seen TONS of them here in socal. Before that I never saw them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
I am the Stig
Drives: Black w/ IOM stripe 1SS Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Saskatoon, SK, CAN
Posts: 1,312
|
haha
touche salesman EDIT: Apparently I forgot to click the quote button haha This out of context comment was directed at our mustang friend
__________________
2010 Camaro - 1SS, Black w/ Orange stripes
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 3,746
|
What numbers would a Direct Injection LS3 put down?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
OOOH....wait...I don't care, it's still a terribly ugly vehicle.
![]() iirc, Hyundai was INSISTANT that the coupe could not harbor a V8. Why the change in attitude, because sales..."stink"? ![]() With a higher compression ratio AND revved to the moon like these little pests? I'd put my money on 500+, easily. Add headers and a Cold Air intake like Ford did...you're looking at 550. The question is whether such an engine can pass emissions...which is likely a "no". The Generation V engines are coming, though...and in a big way. ![]() The way I look at it, the LS3 is based on "old tech" compared to all these new engines...yet it's still just as, if not more powerful than all of them. Imagine the next generation...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Moderator.ca
|
I'd say a DI variant of the LS3 should be good for ~500 hp, give or take.
But don't expect that the DI engines will stay the same size as the current crop of V8's. I've got a gut feeling that GM will go back to using 5.7L engines as their mainstream V8's.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
COTW: 12/13/10
Drives: 1969 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 7,880
|
the genesis seems like a girls car to me, I would wayyyy rather have a 370z
__________________
"Are you one of those boys who prefer cars to women? - I'm one of those boys that appreciates a fine body, regardless of the make." 1969 CAMARO JOURNAL: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=341239 | FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/taylor.ryan.apt | GRAPHIC DESIGN: www.aptdesigns.net |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Moderator.ca
|
It seems like Hyundai has just been trying to follow the Mustang's specs.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Don't Like it? Suggit.
|
Quote:
__________________
"Tops off, tach up baby- loud and proud!" A Camaro lover from day one- 1996 3.8 V6 Camaro, to 1996 5.7 LT1 Camaro Z28, to the sold 2002 5.7 LS1 Camaro SS, and NOW, a [I]6.2 L99 VR 2SS/RS: XS Power stainless full exhaust, Airaid CAI, BMR drop springs and sways, custom tune by Cal Speed- 411rwhp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Banned
Drives: 1991 New Yorker, 69 Tbird, ABM2SSRS Join Date: May 2009
Location: BC Canada
Posts: 2,248
|
The true win would be having a wide spread of options... LS3, DI 5.7, LSA..... Omnomnom
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 2,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Moderator.ca
|
not going to happen. LS3 will be obsolete. How long did GM keep using LT4's once the LS1 came out?
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 3.4l 1995 camaro Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: miami, fl
Posts: 2,202
|
i think that Americans shouldn't be the only ones having fun with muscle cars
__________________
just call me alex. they make anti-me PSA's cos im dope lmao
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Go Cardinals!
Drives: 2010 Camaro 1SS 6-speed #1879 Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 856
|
Sorry...I have never seen a korean car design worth a spit. The trend continues. Hideous.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | ||
|
Account Suspended
Drives: Thunderbird Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 951
|
Quote:
Quote:
Also worth mentioning, Direct Injection almost certainly isn't going to bring as much to the table with the pushrod V8 as a lot of folks are hoping because one of direct injections most troublesome shortcomings was overcome in part by using one of the inherent advantages of a DOHC design. Put simply naturally aspirated, DI engines still technically suffer from fairly serious drive-ability issues under certain fairly specific conditions, you just never encounter that problem because you never see those conditions while driving. The really abridged version is that you end up with some fuel/air mixture issues that cause problems with the combustion process and, the next thing you know, you're mega bucks, DI V8 is 100hp down on power and running like a 9N Ford tractor. The reason you don't see this in the DI DOHC engines being produced right now is because they have literally programed the engine system to run around the problem. You're driving down the road, approaching a scenario where engine load, rpm, etc, etc are all going to merge perfectly to create the above mentioned problem and presto-chango the camshafts swap profiles, the timing changes, and the problem never occurs and all the while you never notice that anything happened to prevent it. One of the problems with the implementation of DI on pushrod engines thus far is that you simply can't fix this problem in that same way because there just isn't enough room on the one camshaft a pushrod engine uses to employ the same level of variability two intake and two exhaust camshafts can provide for obvious reasons. And since that is exactly how virtually every other company on earth fixes this problem that creates a problem. My guess is that all the buzz about a cutting edge combustion chamber has something to do with this, but I will be curious to see how well it actually works at solving these issues. Throw in the fact that DI by itself is really only a 5 percent or so improvement on a DOHC motor on a good day and I think this is an area where what the average GM enthusiast wants this to mean and what GM is actually using it for are two different things. My guess? The advantage GM is looking for with DI is the ability to run higher compression in a smaller, pushrod V8 so they can downsize the engines in the search for better fuel economy without losing very much in the way of power production. |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Holy shit...Talk about 4/5 star crash rating | triq033 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 27 | 02-01-2010 06:21 PM |
| German cars are a better than American.... what a load of crap | Muscle Master | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 29 | 08-20-2009 11:29 PM |