Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-07-2012, 05:28 PM   #29
charlietuna

 
charlietuna's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,342
Sir thank you for your continued support on this forum. You have earned my business without hesitation. When will you be informed on the additional air inlet source rotofab has mentioned on this forum for the ZL1. I only want to order this application once.
__________________
Laus Deo
charlietuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2012, 05:48 PM   #30
hognutz


 
hognutz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: tangent or
Posts: 2,985
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deke736 View Post
So, if I typically run 93 octane my best option is to go with a 5% pulley and a CAI? Would I only need the Torco on track days?

The Rotofab looks nice and obviously has great performance, but I am still waiting to see what CAI, Inc comes out with!
to me that is debatable. I think I would run just the 10% lower no CAI from the data I have seen. that seems to net the best safe gain. 45hp wtihout knock.

the 5% and intake was getting knock.

then again I don't like the idea of knock and this piston type too much but maybe I am over paranoid.

Ted did you guys think about trying the 10% pully with say a 90mm TB? or CAI only with the 90mm TB.

I only bring it up because it is cheap and someone posted in they go 10HP or something with it.

I had a feeling the CAI with the 10% pulley would be too much but was hoping.
__________________
2016 2SS
2020 super duty on 37's
hognutz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2012, 05:57 PM   #31
69NMYSS

 
69NMYSS's Avatar
 
Drives: '69 Camaro SS and '12 ZL1
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: CA
Posts: 1,274
Quote:
Originally Posted by hognutz View Post
to me that is debatable. I think I would run just the 10% lower no CAI from the data I have seen. that seems to net the best safe gain. 45hp wtihout knock.

the 5% and intake was getting knock.

then again I don't like the idea of knock and this piston type too much but maybe I am over paranoid.

Ted did you guys think about trying the 10% pully with say a 90mm TB? or CAI only with the 90mm TB.

I only bring it up because it is cheap and someone posted in they go 10HP or something with it.

I had a feeling the CAI with the 10% pulley would be too much but was hoping.
That is my concern and the reason I asked if the motor automatically pulls timing when it starts knocking, is it something we have to worry about that much? Seems like it is the same thing when IAT2 gets too hot the motor pulls timing and we dont have to worry. Is that the same case with knock retard?
__________________
69NMYSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2012, 06:21 PM   #32
s/c ss
 
s/c ss's Avatar
 
Drives: 13 ZL1, 10 Silverado LTZ, Chopper
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Pittsbugh,PA
Posts: 743
Quote:
Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING View Post
Your Welcome,

No codes are set but knock retard is too severe with both the 10% and the CAI so either 100 octane unleaded or Torco Race Gas Concentrate should be run with this combo to see the results I did SAFELY.


Ted.
I tried to read this a few times but you lost me a little here so I'm going to ask this. Is it ok to run the 97 octane, 10% OD pulley & CAI which will add 75HP over base?
__________________

Last edited by s/c ss; 11-07-2012 at 06:41 PM.
s/c ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2012, 06:23 PM   #33
hairtrigger
 
Drives: 69 Chevelle SS396 2013 ZL1
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: West
Posts: 700
Quote:
Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING View Post
All testing was done on 93 octane until we added TORCO

Power was 514 with 5 % and Rotofab

On 91 octane I suggest only a 5% over pulley Without a tune

Ted
When you ran into knock retard did the ecu drop down into the low octane table and if so, how did you get it back into the high octane table again? Did you have to do a fuse pull?
__________________
hairtrigger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2012, 07:59 PM   #34
avcbm
 
avcbm's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro ZL1
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Jacksonville (area), FL
Posts: 268
Ted,
Seems still like a lot of questions, might I suggest a chart with the various combinations, along with any gains, problems or comments. That way with just a glance all the answers are right there instead of having to go back through the thread and read all the data that was collected….. I’m definitely on board if no tune is required, within reason, I just would like to know what the risk are, and if those risk would be better mitigated with a tune to be safer.
__________________

2012 Camaro ZL1
2010 Camaro SS (Sold)
avcbm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2012, 09:04 PM   #35
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlietuna View Post
Sir thank you for your continued support on this forum. You have earned my business without hesitation. When will you be informed on the additional air inlet source rotofab has mentioned on this forum for the ZL1. I only want to order this application once.
I have one in my possession just ran out of time yesterday and it is snowing today I will test it as soon as the weather breaks
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 39 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2012, 09:20 PM   #36
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by hognutz View Post
to me that is debatable. I think I would run just the 10% lower no CAI from the data I have seen. that seems to net the best safe gain. 45hp wtihout knock.

the 5% and intake was getting knock.

then again I don't like the idea of knock and this piston type too much but maybe I am over paranoid.

Ted did you guys think about trying the 10% pully with say a 90mm TB? or CAI only with the 90mm TB.

I only bring it up because it is cheap and someone posted in they go 10HP or something with it.

I had a feeling the CAI with the 10% pulley would be too much but was hoping.
Just an FYI all cars will see knock retard stock or otherwise this is the computer constantly searching for the right timing for the fuel that it in the tank at the moment, when it goes beyond 1 degree it learns down to a lower timing number in the low octane table, and if there is no knock it learns up toward the High octane table.

The 10% alone and the 5% with CAI had similar results and knock activity well withing normal parameters.

Your right anything beyond this power level would require Custom Tuning To run on this OCTANE fuel including a larger TB.


Quote:
Originally Posted by 69NMYSS View Post
That is my concern and the reason I asked if the motor automatically pulls timing when it starts knocking, is it something we have to worry about that much? Seems like it is the same thing when IAT2 gets too hot the motor pulls timing and we dont have to worry. Is that the same case with knock retard?
Your answer is above

Quote:
Originally Posted by s/c ss View Post
I tried to read this a few times but you lost me a little here so I'm going to ask this. Is it ok to run the 97 octane, 10% OD pulley & CAI which will add 75HP over base?
Yes that is the Conclusion with octane we can run this much boost on the stock tune, There Is Plenty of fuel and little to no Knock Activity.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hairtrigger View Post
When you ran into knock retard did the ecu drop down into the low octane table and if so, how did you get it back into the high octane table again? Did you have to do a fuse pull?
Yes it does, your answer is above also.

Quote:
Originally Posted by avcbm View Post
Ted,
Seems still like a lot of questions, might I suggest a chart with the various combinations, along with any gains, problems or comments. That way with just a glance all the answers are right there instead of having to go back through the thread and read all the data that was collected….. I’m definitely on board if no tune is required, within reason, I just would like to know what the risk are, and if those risk would be better mitigated with a tune to be safer.
I wish it were that easy, I did a Chart on the Cold air testing 2 years ago and I still get question on it daily.

Basically if you follow my recipes you can't go wrong.

Ted.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 39 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2012, 10:33 PM   #37
BSR-1

 
BSR-1's Avatar
 
Drives: 17 ZL1 M6 Black
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Capo Beach, Ca
Posts: 1,411
Quote:
Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING View Post



I wish it were that easy, I did a Chart on the Cold air testing 2 years ago and I still get question on it daily.

Basically if you follow my recipes you can't go wrong.

Ted.
I bought my Injen LT CAI (from you) for my LLT based on your testing.
I REALLY appreciate your transparency, truth and effort.
Thank You!
__________________
BSR-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 11:05 AM   #38
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by BSR-1 View Post
I bought my Injen LT CAI (from you) for my LLT based on your testing.
I REALLY appreciate your transparency, truth and effort.
Thank You!
AWESOME!
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 39 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 12:45 PM   #39
newy
 
Drives: 05 mc ss
Join Date: May 2009
Location: b-ham , ny
Posts: 120
Has anyone done any testing with non-ethonol ? Mine is only a week old so I don,t know the difference with it . Bone stock made 2 tenths in a quarter with my 2010 and 3.5 to 5 mpg highway .
newy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 12:53 PM   #40
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by newy View Post
Has anyone done any testing with non-ethonol ? Mine is only a week old so I don,t know the difference with it . Bone stock made 2 tenths in a quarter with my 2010 and 3.5 to 5 mpg highway .
If we could get it locally we would be running ourselves but that does not help the Majority of America with E-10 to E-20

Ted.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 39 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 01:31 PM   #41
69NMYSS

 
69NMYSS's Avatar
 
Drives: '69 Camaro SS and '12 ZL1
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: CA
Posts: 1,274
Ted,
Can you please explain what is causing the knock with the 10% OD pulley for those of us not as mechanically inclined as others? I realize it is detonating but is this because the A/F ratio is off due to the increased boost?
__________________
69NMYSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 01:36 PM   #42
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by 69NMYSS View Post
Ted,
Can you please explain what is causing the knock with the 10% OD pulley for those of us not as mechanically inclined as others? I realize it is detonating but is this because the A/F ratio is off due to the increased boost?
Boost Pressure VS Octane, AFR is Perfect.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 39 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.