![]() |
![]() |
#127 | |
Booooosted.
|
Quote:
Might have to just do the 8 rib. $$$$$$$ I assume Ted has a 8 rib pulley for his supertensioner. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#128 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 11,927
|
Quote:
Well WTF! Now you don't like the nosie. There's just no pleasing you! ![]() I have an 8 rib with the supertensioner. It works just as well. You'll get a 10% OD crank pulley with the 8 rib kit so a 3.4 should be mint. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#129 |
Booooosted.
|
haha, Long as I can spin 10-12 psi I'm good. Of course IF I still go with a few more cubes (I'm hard headed like that) and still want 10-12 then I guess I'll have to go with the cog set-up.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#130 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 11,927
|
Quote:
LPE makes and overdriven rear pulley set-up. No cogs, no whine. Unlike you! You can pretty much hit any boost number you want with all the products out there. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#131 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 11,927
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#132 | |
Booooosted.
|
Quote:
One thing I have to remember is I need bigger injectors and a fuel pump. I'm stock pump with a BAP. And 53 pound injectors. Was only pushing 6-7 pounds of boost though on my daily driving. But if the Maggie won't hit 10-12 pounds with a 419 without taxing the shit out of it then I'll go back 376. Yours has done impressively well. What were you running with no spray? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#133 | |
Booooosted.
|
Quote:
To bad it's so hard to tell without actually logging it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#134 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 11,927
|
Quote:
It went 9.98 at like 138 in some good North East DA. It was right at 10.0 on any given day. Look into the LPE dual pumps and obviously much bigger injectors. I have those ID 850's and we're just about at 800 rwhp with room to go with the LPE pumps and the ID's. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#135 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 11,927
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#136 | ||
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 11,927
|
Quote:
30+mph headwind. You can hear it. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#137 | ||
Booooosted.
|
Quote:
Quote:
But answer me this........ With more cubes and the same boost why would the car be slower. It would make more power. Is it because the torque might be lower? |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#138 |
Booooosted.
|
That doesn't sound as bad as I've heard on others.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#139 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 11,927
|
Quote:
I have no idea why. I've seen a few big cubes tvs 2300's that made much more rwhp than me be over .5 second slower. Maybe to make that peak power they over spin the blower thus causing a high IAT issue and really making less power when out on the track. Just something about the 2300 and the 376. If I thought the car would be quick on a 416 my car would be done already.. Ted offered me his built shop motor yesterday. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#140 | |
Booooosted.
|
Quote:
How much does he want for it? lmao (kidding to rib Chris a bit) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|