(UPDATED) Stainless Works exhaust and header systems!! (Tag's SS w/ HP #'s) - Page 10 - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

zebra · 05-26-2009, 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAG UR IT

...And we DO have someone here in powertrain. How cool would that be if they said, "Hey...that's Tag's (Dougs) LS3. Let's ....*looks around*....surprise him

" ...

i would crap myself if i found out they did that to my car!

2010 CAMARO SS RS · 05-26-2009, 09:25 PM

THE BEST SOUND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IM DEFINITELY BUYING!!!!!

Gentry78 · 05-26-2009, 09:26 PM

sweet i can't wait to see the numbers after a CAI and tune

maybe 450-60 rwhp, that would be sweet

Amwellls1 · 05-26-2009, 09:45 PM

To good to be true, lets see some track numbers

blackedout010 · 05-26-2009, 09:57 PM

awesome!!! probably a mistake but its still gonna be strong and sounds great!!

dankss · 05-27-2009, 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAG UR IT

Yep. I'm happy with it. Tell ya'll what. I just got the #'s back from Stainless Works. Here's how it played out.

Now...we have NO idea how this happened, but ya'll are going to love the results.

I was told my car dyno'd at 416hp a while back...but we figured that was flywheel and it still needed to be broken in. Well, Scott from Stainless Works and I got to talking today through email. Here's a snippet of what he had to say....

I don't know what to think of this, but NO ONE tuned the car. Tom didn't do anything nor did Stainless. So, how in the world this car is getting "approximately" 490 at the crank is BEYOND ALL OF US.

All my charts are in Excel format. It'll take a few to figure out how to do the graphs for all to see. But, the #'s for REAR WHEEL HP so far are:

Stock:

416hp and 349tq @ 6259rpm

(torque was greatest at 4609rpm w/ 402tq)

Catback:

423hp and 355tq @ 6255rpm

(torque was greatest at 4605rpm @ 407tq)

PEAK HP w/ HEADERS AND ALL:

440hp and 377tq @ 6123rpm

(torque was greatest at 4673rpm at 417tq)

REMEMBER......

THESE #'s ARE GOING TO BE CHECKED ON A DYNOJET. We are NOT sure if the #'s are correct, but this is what was told to us. AGAIN...DO NOT FREAK OUT! THE #'s WILL be run again to verify.

I explained that this was odd and thought his #'s were off. He said,

if you have a frankenstein car, that really makes that kind of power stock...

im going to punch you... :slice:

*TAG UR IT* · 05-28-2009, 02:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dankss

if you have a frankenstein car, that really makes that kind of power stock...

im going to punch you... :slice:

Not if I punch myself first.

MerF · 05-28-2009, 06:54 AM

Tag, and company, this is a Mustang dyno. Those are the absolute worse examples of a dyno I've ever come across.

God this sucks, I'm not trying to be the pessimist here but it's only fair to point out how consistently AWFUL Mustang dynos are. They do require operator input to do their job and they "guess" about power instead of giving the numbers like a conventional dyno. I've been at shows (plural!) that had Mustang dynos there and people were getting 600 ft/lbs of torque on their bot-on 4-bangers...then I watched a mildly upgraded (still stock twins) Supra pull like 1200 ft/lbs. No kidding at one show right after watching one of these Honda owners get all excited, I watch a classic V8 get told it only had 195 ft/lbs but 800 rwhp. In natrual fashion, the ricer believed the numbers and proceeded to high-five his buddies.

In other words, I wish you the best Tag that would be awesome...but don't hold your breath by any means.

*radz28* · 05-28-2009, 10:39 AM

I think an important thing to remember are the gains from the mods'

Sure, the baseline numbers can be fudged (I won't speculate if that was/wasn't the case) but the proof is in the improvement of the parts, and it seems like there was a good improvement.

JMVHO

Respectfully...

GMtothecore · 05-28-2009, 11:03 AM

very sweet TAG, congrats......
I'm gonna have to swing down to SA when I get mine later this summer.

THE EVIL TW1N · 05-28-2009, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MerF

Tag, and company, this is a Mustang dyno. Those are the absolute worse examples of a dyno I've ever come across.

God this sucks, I'm not trying to be the pessimist here but it's only fair to point out how consistently AWFUL Mustang dynos are. They do require operator input to do their job and they "guess" about power instead of giving the numbers like a conventional dyno. I've been at shows (plural!) that had Mustang dynos there and people were getting 600 ft/lbs of torque on their bot-on 4-bangers...then I watched a mildly upgraded (still stock twins) Supra pull like 1200 ft/lbs. No kidding at one show right after watching one of these Honda owners get all excited, I watch a classic V8 get told it only had 195 ft/lbs but 800 rwhp. In natrual fashion, the ricer believed the numbers and proceeded to high-five his buddies.

In other words, I wish you the best Tag that would be awesome...but don't hold your breath by any means.

+1

and I agree with radz too.

*TAG UR IT* · 05-31-2009, 02:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MerF

Tag, and company, this is a Mustang dyno. Those are the absolute worse examples of a dyno I've ever come across.

God this sucks, I'm not trying to be the pessimist here but it's only fair to point out how consistently AWFUL Mustang dynos are. They do require operator input to do their job and they "guess" about power instead of giving the numbers like a conventional dyno. I've been at shows (plural!) that had Mustang dynos there and people were getting 600 ft/lbs of torque on their bot-on 4-bangers...then I watched a mildly upgraded (still stock twins) Supra pull like 1200 ft/lbs. No kidding at one show right after watching one of these Honda owners get all excited, I watch a classic V8 get told it only had 195 ft/lbs but 800 rwhp. In natrual fashion, the ricer believed the numbers and proceeded to high-five his buddies.

In other words, I wish you the best Tag that would be awesome...but don't hold your breath by any means.

Oh, I'm not...which is exactly why we are going to redyno this bad boy...Don't know when, but I'll post up the result as soon as I can.

Quote:

Originally Posted by radz282003

I think an important thing to remember are the gains from the mods'

Sure, the baseline numbers can be fudged (I won't speculate if that was/wasn't the case) but the proof is in the improvement of the parts, and it seems like there was a good improvement.

JMVHO

Respectfully...

exactly. however, those #'s WOULD be cool if they were real!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by GMtothecore

very sweet TAG, congrats......
I'm gonna have to swing down to SA when I get mine later this summer.

Just let me know when! A few of us can get together!

Oh...and here ya go...

SummoneR · 05-31-2009, 03:56 AM

That's awesome TAG!!! sounds amazing!

Kyle2k · 05-31-2009, 10:06 PM

Is there a SW rep on this site? I'd like to see a baseline/untuned/tuned dyno list for the 1 7/8th version of your headers as well!

05-26-2009, 09:45 PM	#130
Amwellls1 Old School Drives: 2002 WS6 440 m6 Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Washington Pa Posts: 180	To good to be true, lets see some track numbers __________________ 2002 White WS6 440LSX M6 2010 GMC Sierra All terrain 6.2 2012 Corvette GS M6

05-28-2009, 10:39 AM	#135
radz28 Petro-sexual Drives: Ultra-Grin Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Crazy Coast Posts: 15,809 View My Garage	I think an important thing to remember are the gains from the mods' Sure, the baseline numbers can be fudged (I won't speculate if that was/wasn't the case) but the proof is in the improvement of the parts, and it seems like there was a good improvement. JMVHO Respectfully... __________________ '20 ZL1 Black "Fury" A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs

05-28-2009, 11:03 AM	#136
GMtothecore "That Guy" Drives: Camaro SS...........what else? Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: OOOOOOOklahoma where the wind comes sweepin' down the plains. Posts: 2,360	very sweet TAG, congrats...... I'm gonna have to swing down to SA when I get mine later this summer. __________________

05-31-2009, 03:56 AM	#139
SummoneR Paul Drives: '10 2SS/RS M6 "Marauder" Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: NOR*CAL Posts: 6,230	That's awesome TAG!!! sounds amazing! __________________

05-31-2009, 10:06 PM	#140
Kyle2k LVL 50 Troll Stomper Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Indianapolis Posts: 3,463	Is there a SW rep on this site? I'd like to see a baseline/untuned/tuned dyno list for the 1 7/8th version of your headers as well! __________________

05-26-2009, 09:25 PM	#128
2010 CAMARO SS RS Drives: 2010 Camaro SS RS Join Date: May 2009 Location: New York, NY Posts: 141	THE BEST SOUND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IM DEFINITELY BUYING!!!!!

05-26-2009, 09:26 PM	#129
Gentry78 HOOK'EM Drives: 97 c1500/92 olds Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Texas Posts: 5,279	sweet i can't wait to see the numbers after a CAI and tune maybe 450-60 rwhp, that would be sweet

05-26-2009, 09:57 PM	#131
blackedout010 Drives: on order black 2010 2ss Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: north carolina Posts: 913	awesome!!! probably a mistake but its still gonna be strong and sounds great!!

05-28-2009, 06:54 AM	#134
MerF Go Rays! Drives: 03 Trailblazer Join Date: May 2007 Location: St Pete, Florida Posts: 2,532	Tag, and company, this is a Mustang dyno. Those are the absolute worse examples of a dyno I've ever come across. God this sucks, I'm not trying to be the pessimist here but it's only fair to point out how consistently AWFUL Mustang dynos are. They do require operator input to do their job and they "guess" about power instead of giving the numbers like a conventional dyno. I've been at shows (plural!) that had Mustang dynos there and people were getting 600 ft/lbs of torque on their bot-on 4-bangers...then I watched a mildly upgraded (still stock twins) Supra pull like 1200 ft/lbs. No kidding at one show right after watching one of these Honda owners get all excited, I watch a classic V8 get told it only had 195 ft/lbs but 800 rwhp. In natrual fashion, the ricer believed the numbers and proceeded to high-five his buddies. In other words, I wish you the best Tag that would be awesome...but don't hold your breath by any means.