Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Vararam
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-11-2009, 01:35 PM   #211
tradosaurus
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 F150 Lariat, Candy Red
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Easy Go View Post
I'm just starting to keep track now that the car is broken in, so I don't have specific numbers yet - but in previous cars, I've been able to exceed EPA by 10% just by going easy on accel and decel. Basically, the less you use the gas and brake pedals, the more energy you are conserving. I never realized any gains by using a K&N filter. Should have bought another tank of gas instead.

Will report back later once I've got my own data to share.
After using K&N on at least 5 different cars over a number of years I too believe the K&N is absolutely useless for MPG or HP gains.

The only benefit to me is that it is cleanable and reusable.
tradosaurus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2009, 02:07 PM   #212
theholycow


 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Drives: '02 GMC Sierra, '80 Lesabre
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: RI
Posts: 1,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by tradosaurus View Post
After using K&N on at least 5 different cars over a number of years I too believe the K&N is absolutely useless for MPG or HP gains.

The only benefit to me is that it is cleanable and reusable.
If, and only if, the existing filter is a bottleneck, then an upgraded filter could free up top-end power. That is, when WOT near redline, where the engine is producing the maximum power and flowing the maximum amount of air.

An air filter will not affect fuel economy. The only way it could would be if it was so clogged that there was a significant amount of pumping loss from trying to pull air through it. That is, if a lot of energy was spent trying to get the air to pass through the filter. IRL, long before that happens any driver would notice such a significant decrease in performance that he would begin troubleshooting his car and notice the caked-up filter.
__________________
Removing weight has surprisingly little effect on fuel economy
Engine break-in procedure | Gear ratios
2002 GMC Sierra 4x4 5.3 (190,000 miles and going strong)
1980 Buick Lesabre family heirloom with 36,000 miles
2008 Volkswagen Rabbit 2 door I5-2.5 5spd DD lease
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroSpike23 View Post
she really underestimates the damage i would do to her reproductive organs
http://allOffTopic.com is the place for all the naughty stuff you can't get away with on this forum...
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2009, 06:17 PM   #213
Bumblebee10
Bumblebee10
 
Bumblebee10's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2LT Red Jewel RS Automatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Land O Lakes,Fl
Posts: 96
in break in I got 17.8 mpg. I drove it on the highway with 93 oct gas for 300 miles and was getting 24.1mpg. Now at 6,000 miles I use 89 octane gas and get 18.4mpg mostly medium traffic roads. It will never get to what the GM specs said it would. It would never be 29mpg. I was told by the dealer that those gas averages are done at 52mph on a cool day on the highway for 25 miles with 93octane gas. That is how they inflate the mpg to 29.
__________________
Bumblebee10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2009, 09:14 AM   #214
faninc
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro RS in SIM
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 563
If the car is set up for 87 octane (v6) why would they test with 93 octane and why would it yield better results? The Bosch PCM supposedly learns and retunes based on factory setting...so unclear why 93 octane would yield an improvement? Not to mention, GM would be risking truth in advertising? They advertise reccomended fuel is 87 octane and then due EPA test using 93 octane- bait and switch would come to mind?

Happy with my 26-27mph using 87 octane...

happy holidays all.
faninc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2009, 09:31 AM   #215
rolnslo
Rolling along...
 
rolnslo's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS SGM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,366
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bumblebee10 View Post
in break in I got 17.8 mpg. I drove it on the highway with 93 oct gas for 300 miles and was getting 24.1mpg. Now at 6,000 miles I use 89 octane gas and get 18.4mpg mostly medium traffic roads. It will never get to what the GM specs said it would. It would never be 29mpg. I was told by the dealer that those gas averages are done at 52mph on a cool day on the highway for 25 miles with 93octane gas. That is how they inflate the mpg to 29.


If you have the time, go educate yourself from the source of the testing. http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/fe_test_schedules.shtml

Now, having said that, you might as well quit running anything but 87 octane gas in your v6. There is one fuel table and it is for 87 octane. Running anything higher is just wasting your money at the pump. Unfortunately, the v6 is not like the v8 and we don't get a different fuel table for 87 and 91 octane.

As for getting the EPA numbers, it is entirely possible. You just have to drive it more like a Prius and less like a sports car.
__________________
rolnslo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2009, 09:40 AM   #216
scrming
Red Brick of Vengeance!
 
scrming's Avatar
 
Drives: 12 Second Brick
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolnslo View Post


If you have the time, go educate yourself from the source of the testing. http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/fe_test_schedules.shtml

Now, having said that, you might as well quit running anything but 87 octane gas in your v6. There is one fuel table and it is for 87 octane. Running anything higher is just wasting your money at the pump. Unfortunately, the v6 is not like the v8 and we don't get a different fuel table for 87 and 91 octane.

As for getting the EPA numbers, it is entirely possible. You just have to drive it more like a Prius and less like a sports car.
The question is... Are the knock sensors kicking in at all with 87? I can see "spark retard" on my Dashhawk but I'm not sure where exactly it is coming from... Unfortunately I can't directly monitor the knock sensors... it just seemed to me that the "spark retard" was less active with higher octane gas... Again this is not scientific, just casual observations... So you might be able to get a couple of degrees more of timing running the higher octane if the knock sensors are active using 87... And yes, the knock sensors will pull timing before you, the driver, can actually hear it yourself..
scrming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2009, 12:10 PM   #217
Aquaman
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro LT Aqua Blue
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 47
Getting about what the EPA states

29.2 mpg straight hwy (averaging around 70 mph).

23.8 mpg 50% hwy and 50% city.

Using 87 octane of course and driving normal (not granny or insane).

Really incredibly when you think about it.

I have 1,400 miles on the car now and have been calculating by the fill up method.

By the way, the "average mpg" calculation done by the vehicle is extremely accurate +/- .2 mpg from what I calculate.
Aquaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2009, 12:21 PM   #218
mrray13


 
Drives: 2010 1LT RS Rally Yellow
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: southern Illinois
Posts: 2,973
I've been averaging 22mpg combined. I drive about 75-25 highway/city, cruise usually set at 65-68mph on the interstate. That said, I do tend to play quite often, and I know tht drops mileage.

Overall, I'm very happy with what the car is returning compared to the fun factor I have with it.
mrray13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 12:19 PM   #219
ROD1
Retired
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro RS V6 #1301 DOB 3/23/09
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ithaca NY
Posts: 2,563
19mpg; 50/country driving 25/city 25/highway. Not much speeding but I get to 60 as fast as I can most times when I can.
ROD1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 12:30 PM   #220
ROD1
Retired
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro RS V6 #1301 DOB 3/23/09
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ithaca NY
Posts: 2,563
So far it looks like this to me.
Mostly city- 19
Mixed- 21
Highway -23
Long trip Highway - 25

I noticed the Canadians seem to get much lower mileage.
ROD1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 01:01 PM   #221
gbmike
 
gbmike's Avatar
 
Drives: 2020 2SS Conv
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: St Augustine, FL
Posts: 248
hmmm... using 93 octane (not cotrrect?) and getting 14.9-15.1 right now, yep the V6 and only back road country (city) commute (12 miles each way). Not good ! had a 350 z before and was getting about 17...
gbmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 01:18 PM   #222
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by gbmike View Post
hmmm... using 93 octane (not cotrrect?) and getting 14.9-15.1 right now, yep the V6 and only back road country (city) commute (12 miles each way). Not good ! had a 350 z before and was getting about 17...
No, its not correct. Why would you use premium in the V6? The manual says use regular, so use it.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2009, 09:49 PM   #223
ponykiller
 
Drives: black on black v6 rs
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: elkton md
Posts: 18
has anyone used 92 octane (high test) for the v6
ponykiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2009, 06:01 PM   #224
gbmike
 
gbmike's Avatar
 
Drives: 2020 2SS Conv
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: St Augustine, FL
Posts: 248
the manual says use minimum 87... also the V6 350Z needed the higher and that was a V6
gbmike is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pure Acetone to help Gas Mileage? Dentyneice General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 16 05-13-2009 02:03 PM
CANADIAN GAS MILEAGE! V6 AUTO turab16 Canada 29 05-04-2009 02:06 PM
V-6 mustang EPA Gas Mileage comiskeybum General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 33 03-18-2009 07:05 PM
Massachusetts may consider mileage chip bigralph General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 12 02-20-2009 09:58 PM
Fuel pump or bad tank of gas? Boomer Sooner 4th Generation Camaros 25 01-02-2009 07:34 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.