Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Roto-Fab
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-27-2009, 07:56 PM   #211
PQ
Booooosted.
 
PQ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Supercharged SS
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 36,717
Send a message via Yahoo to PQ
[QUOTE=Warr3nc;852713]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueclyde View Post



I found this in the owners manual section on GM's SI website. So one would really think the dealers would know better to put 87 in the V-8's.
Recommended Fuel

If the vehicle has the 3.6L V6 engine (VIN Code V), use regular unleaded gasoline with a posted octane rating of 87 or higher. If the octane rating is less than 87, an audible knocking noise, commonly referred to as spark knock, might be heard when driving. If this occurs, use a gasoline rated at 87 octane or higher as soon as possible. If heavy knocking is heard when using gasoline rated at 87 octane or higher, the engine needs service.

If the vehicle has the 6.2L V8 engine (VIN Code W) or the 6.2L V8 engine (VIN Code J), use premium unleaded gasoline with a posted octane rating of 91 or higher. For best performance, use premium unleaded gasoline with a posted octane rating of 93. You can also use regular unleaded gasoline rated at 87 octane or higher, but the vehicle's acceleration could be slightly reduced, and a slight audible knocking noise, commonly referred to as spark knock, might be heard. If the octane rating is less than 87, a heavy knocking noise might be heard when driving. If this occurs, use a gasoline rated at 87 octane or higher as soon as possible. Otherwise, you could damage the engine. If heavy knocking is heard when using gasoline rated at 87 octane or higher, the engine needs service.

I just read the knock sensor description and operation on the SI website as well so it makes me think this whole problem while caused by the dealers was compounded by some programming issues too. I could paste the knock sensor description if anyone would like to read how that system works.

Great find man.

But I would change that from 'slightly' to 'significantly'

Either way I feel vindicated.
__________________
PQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2009, 08:07 PM   #212
Warr3nc
 
Drives: 1969 Camaro
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Raleigh
Posts: 12
Oh yeah considering the numbers I saw from some of the L99's, 'significantly' would definitely fit the situation better. Glad I could help.
Warr3nc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2009, 10:17 PM   #213
Ject
aka Patrick
 
Ject's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 Camaro 2SS '04 Silverado
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Derby Kansas
Posts: 3,072
Send a message via Yahoo to Ject
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bell040 View Post
u runnin 93 octane?
yup
__________________
Current Modifications: Your average Bolt-ons & Suspension Upgrades
GForce Engineering: 9" Rear End, Strange Pro Iron Case w/Moser Nodular 3.70:1 Detroit locker, 3.5" Solid Drive Shaft
Ject is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2009, 10:23 PM   #214
ls2gto
 
Drives: 2009 G8GT; 2007 Lexus LS 460
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 33
[QUOTE=irpq11;852760]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warr3nc View Post

Great find man.

But I would change that from 'slightly' to 'significantly'
That's what still does not make sense to me. 87 is only supposed to reduce the acceleration slightly not significantly AND using 87, if it is all you can find, is not supposed to require reset of the computer when you go back to premium.

My G8 came with 87 and it definitley seemed to smooth out and perk up soon after I filled it with 93. I was in it hard tonight and there is no way the 0-60 time is 6.0 or higher. However, there is also no way I gained 100 hp by adding 93- that's like adding nitrous.
ls2gto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2009, 10:32 PM   #215
Warr3nc
 
Drives: 1969 Camaro
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Raleigh
Posts: 12
[QUOTE=ls2gto;853631]
Quote:
Originally Posted by irpq11 View Post

That's what still does not make sense to me. 87 is only supposed to reduce the acceleration slightly not significantly AND using 87, if it is all you can find, is not supposed to require reset of the computer when you go back to premium.

My G8 came with 87 and it definitley seemed to smooth out and perk up soon after I filled it with 93. I was in it hard tonight and there is no way the 0-60 time is 6.0 or higher. However, there is also no way I gained 100 hp by adding 93- that's like adding nitrous.
Yeah very true. I posted in another thread the description and operation of the knock system and it is supposed to advance and retard the timing as needed. I think this is just a programming issue that caused the PCM to stay in the low octane table. I also read that the timing b/t the high and low tables was up to 16 degrees which is quite a bit of accel. GM will come out with an update soon. I see the updates for the A/C compressor are out as well as updates for the multimedia accessories.
Warr3nc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2009, 11:18 PM   #216
ls2gto
 
Drives: 2009 G8GT; 2007 Lexus LS 460
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 33
[QUOTE=Warr3nc;853684]
Quote:
Originally Posted by ls2gto View Post

Yeah very true. I posted in another thread the description and operation of the knock system and it is supposed to advance and retard the timing as needed. I think this is just a programming issue that caused the PCM to stay in the low octane table. I also read that the timing b/t the high and low tables was up to 16 degrees which is quite a bit of accel. GM will come out with an update soon. I see the updates for the A/C compressor are out as well as updates for the multimedia accessories.
Yeah my guess is that more than just the octane is involved here, but it all gets corrected, at least for a while, by the fuse pull.
ls2gto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2009, 11:37 PM   #217
Keith Kinkaid
"So you're my guardian?"
 
Keith Kinkaid's Avatar
 
Drives: Bumblebee/2 SS RS
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 21
Just finished burning the last 1/4 tank of 87 octane gas out of my car, I ran up and down the interstate for about 2 hrs. just letting it loose, even caught a guy in a challenger and played with him :-) I was dusting him for a minute until neither one of us could go any futher....to much traffic on the interstate. When I got up to about 105 mph my ears started popping like I was on an airplane (lol). I filled it up with Exxon 93 octane ($46.00 to fill it up...Damn) and took it home and pulled the fuses, will let everyone know the results tommorrow.
__________________

"Can You Talk"..."So You Talk Through The Radio"
Keith Kinkaid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2009, 12:47 AM   #218
PQ
Booooosted.
 
PQ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Supercharged SS
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 36,717
Send a message via Yahoo to PQ
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ject View Post
yup
Any better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Kinkaid View Post
Just finished burning the last 1/4 tank of 87 octane gas out of my car, I ran up and down the interstate for about 2 hrs. just letting it loose, even caught a guy in a challenger and played with him :-) I was dusting him for a minute until neither one of us could go any futher....to much traffic on the interstate. When I got up to about 105 mph my ears started popping like I was on an airplane (lol). I filled it up with Exxon 93 octane ($46.00 to fill it up...Damn) and took it home and pulled the fuses, will let everyone know the results tommorrow.
L99?
__________________
PQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2009, 01:18 AM   #219
19K3SS
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lincoln Park, MI
Posts: 237
So I'm thinking of doing this, even thou I have an LS3. I had my car dyno'ed a couple weeks ago, was putting down around 350 at the wheels. Just for kicks I was gonna get it dyno'ed again since I got the GMPP exhaust, to see if there really was any difference. Maybe after that, I'll pull the fuses... Would be interesting to see what difference it makes if I dyno it after pulling the fuses... (the car does not seem slow at all, but I did have to use 91octane one day, as opposed to the normal 93 I put in it... and I'm just curious to see if I'd get even more out of it by doing it!)
__________________
Delivered 29May09: 2SS/RS Black w/ CGM Rally Stripes, Black Int, 6spd, 20" Polished
VIN: 2G1FT1EW2A9108883
19K3SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2009, 03:54 AM   #220
orange_5thgen
 
Drives: 2010 IOM 2SS/RS BadAss 6 Speed
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 199
First mine is an LS3. I've been reading this thread for a few days and I figured pulling the fuses would not hurt anything. I have noticed it idling a little rough, but have not done any 0-60 times etc....

Now I've driven a few different standard/manual vehicles in my time, but I'll be damned if I have not had trouble driving this car. I figured I was just out of practice and this is not my daily driver, SO makes sense that I do not drive it every day. I've had a lot of jerky takeoffs and trouble shfting smoothly from one gear to the next.

Alright, so I pulled the fuses and let it sit over night and put them back. NOW CALL ME CRAZY, call me whacky but I swear it shifts a lot better now and smoother. I feel like I actually know how to drive a standard vehicle again!

I mean this could be the placebo affect and all, but you can't tell me I all of a sudden got the manual shifting technique back. Maybe I was just having a good night. Anyway, it also seemed to idle a lot better.

I did not drive get to drive it too much, it was kinda late and I was a little tired, so I did not want to get on it too much. In other words, not sure if it feels more peppy or not right now.

If this is a placebo affect then I'm down with it!

Right now I'd say pulling the fuses was a good thing. It's shifting like BUTTA BABY!

I don't know what octane fuel my dealer put in it, but I figure 95% of them are gonna fill it with 87.

I'm happy, of course I've been happy since I got the car!

Now I just gotta get my Tire Pressure Monitoring System back. It went on the blink a few days ago and is telling me to get it serviced, BUT I'm still happy.

orange_5thgen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2009, 06:24 AM   #221
Ject
aka Patrick
 
Ject's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 Camaro 2SS '04 Silverado
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Derby Kansas
Posts: 3,072
Send a message via Yahoo to Ject
Quote:
Originally Posted by irpq11 View Post
Any better?
Nope, still seems very slugish, put about 30 miles on it yesterday and still no improvement, I'll probably pull the fuses again today all day and see if it goes back to normal.
__________________
Current Modifications: Your average Bolt-ons & Suspension Upgrades
GForce Engineering: 9" Rear End, Strange Pro Iron Case w/Moser Nodular 3.70:1 Detroit locker, 3.5" Solid Drive Shaft
Ject is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2009, 06:44 AM   #222
HDDAN

 
HDDAN's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 1SS 2007 HD FLSTC
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 1,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsmith View Post
Okay so I pulled the fuses yesterday for 12 hours and had the oppurtunity to do a 0-60 run. Before the fuse pull I had a best 0-60 run of 5.2 seconds, after the fuse pull I had a run of 5.75 seconds.......... but that's becuase I was laying rubber down for 10 feet.

So I am going to try more runs and work on not lighting up the tires on my launch.
This is the kind of stuff that I love to hear. It is not raining in Boston today, so normally I would be on my Harley. But after the fuse pull the night before last and driving my re-calibrated 1SS yesterday, I couldn't resist taking the Camaro to work and doing hole shots from every light. I was leaving the traction control on and the transmission in M for sport but not tap shifting. The tires will spin for a couple of feet and then away we go! My car also never felt slow but it didn't feel 75 hp stronger than the 2002 SS that I traded in to get it. It sure does now. I made some passes at New England Dragway with my bone stock 02 SS and was turning 13.5s @ 104 mph. I plan on bringing my 2010 up there this Wednesday night to see what she will do. I will post pictures of my time slips. The only thing that will keep me from going would be rain.
HDDAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2009, 07:20 AM   #223
Jekyll-N-Hyde
I put the FU back in FUN
 
Jekyll-N-Hyde's Avatar
 
Drives: 1969 SS 396 , 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Between Weatherford and Azle TX hway730
Posts: 2,129
Do these cars show up to the dealership with close to Zero in Gas ? If so im telling my dealer to not put Gas in it . I dont want 87 octane put in and have to drive it all out and pull fuzes on a new car.
Jekyll-N-Hyde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2009, 07:47 AM   #224
Lord Grey
 
Lord Grey's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by orange_5thgen View Post
First mine is an LS3. I've been reading this thread for a few days and I figured pulling the fuses would not hurt anything. I have noticed it idling a little rough, but have not done any 0-60 times etc....

Now I've driven a few different standard/manual vehicles in my time, but I'll be damned if I have not had trouble driving this car. I figured I was just out of practice and this is not my daily driver, SO makes sense that I do not drive it every day. I've had a lot of jerky takeoffs and trouble shfting smoothly from one gear to the next.

Alright, so I pulled the fuses and let it sit over night and put them back. NOW CALL ME CRAZY, call me whacky but I swear it shifts a lot better now and smoother. I feel like I actually know how to drive a standard vehicle again!

I mean this could be the placebo affect and all, but you can't tell me I all of a sudden got the manual shifting technique back. Maybe I was just having a good night. Anyway, it also seemed to idle a lot better.

I did not drive get to drive it too much, it was kinda late and I was a little tired, so I did not want to get on it too much. In other words, not sure if it feels more peppy or not right now.

If this is a placebo affect then I'm down with it!

Right now I'd say pulling the fuses was a good thing. It's shifting like BUTTA BABY!

I don't know what octane fuel my dealer put in it, but I figure 95% of them are gonna fill it with 87.

I'm happy, of course I've been happy since I got the car!

Now I just gotta get my Tire Pressure Monitoring System back. It went on the blink a few days ago and is telling me to get it serviced, BUT I'm still happy.

I wasn't going to say anything, but I experienced exactly the same thing, regarding the shifting. I've been driving manuals for decades, but the Camaro's clutch was so different I felt like I was driving it like a beginner. After the fuse pull, I too thought the car was easier to shift. I couldn't think of a reason why the fuse pull would affect that, so I just chalked it up to me getting more used to the car.
Lord Grey is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2010 Camaro PCM Pin-out Description and Wire Colors (LS3 & L99) raptor Audio, Video, Bluetooth, Navigation, Radar, Electronics Forum 14 06-02-2020 01:51 PM
What kind of gas are you filling up with in your '10 Camaro? JewelZ 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 42 08-02-2009 10:31 AM
Check your Order here bvonscott Camaro Price | Ordering | Tracking | Dealers Discussions 665 06-29-2009 02:00 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.