Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-10-2022, 01:44 PM   #211
NOT A 45

 
NOT A 45's Avatar
 
Drives: 13 CAMARO 2SS LS3-04 SILVERADO LS3
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: SOUTHERN MARYLAND
Posts: 801
Quote:
Originally Posted by redcoats1976 View Post
i thought both the L99 and LS3 required premium,isnt that in the owners manual? if i can prove to my buddy that he can run 87 safely he will be pretty happy.
This is how we can safely run 87 in our cars. Sure if you want to race around or act like a fool premium would be better, but if you just want to drive normal like 95% of us do then 87 is fine! And NO premium fuel is not required...by law it would say so on the fuel door.

The knock sensor system enables the engine control module (ECM) to control the ignition timing for the best possible performance while protecting the engine from potentially damaging levels of detonation, also known as spark knock. The knock sensor system uses one or two flat response 2-wire sensors. The sensor uses piezo-electric crystal technology that produces an AC voltage signal of varying amplitude and frequency based on the engine vibration or noise level. The amplitude and frequency are dependant upon the level of knock that the knock sensor detects. The ECM receives the knock sensor signal through two isolated signal circuits for each knock sensor.

The control module learns a minimum noise level, or background noise, at idle from the knock sensor and uses calibrated values for the rest of the RPM range. The control module uses the minimum noise level to calculate a noise channel. A normal knock sensor signal will ride within the noise channel. As engine speed and load change, the noise channel upper and lower parameters will change to accommodate the normal knock sensor signal, keeping the signal within the channel. In order to determine which cylinders are knocking, the control module only uses knock sensor signal information when each cylinder is near top dead center (TDC) of the firing stroke. If knock is present, the signal will range outside of the noise channel.

If the control module has determined that knock is present, it will retard the ignition timing to attempt to eliminate the knock. The control module will always try to work back to a zero compensation level, or no spark retard. An abnormal knock sensor signal will stay outside of the noise channel or will not be present. knock sensor diagnostics are calibrated to detect faults with the knock sensor circuitry inside the control module, the knock sensor wiring, or the knock sensor voltage output. Some diagnostics are also calibrated to detect constant noise from an outside influence such as a loose/damaged component or excessive engine mechanical noise.
NOT A 45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2022, 01:45 PM   #212
Silveradoss573
Banned
 
Drives: Camaro 1LE
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 1,347
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIKZ28 View Post
Change is good. Technology is a great thing that has made all our lives easier. But when it is forced upon us before it is economicaly viable I must disagree wth it. This is tearing the country apart and hurting the people most who can not aford it. Plus spending our hard earned tax dollars just to try to advance a technology is also wrong. Most of these so called green technologys are not possable with out government subsities. Until we can advance green energys technology to the point where there can be a profit in it we are shooting ourselves in the foot. Let technology advance at it's own pace and we can all be happy.
Well put!

Just for giggles last night I did some cost/savings estimating. I figured a equally equipped ev truck will cost north of 60K. Figure in sales tax and I would be pushing 70k. And I feel I may be a little conservative on that price. For my particular situation, it would take almost 7 years to break even if fuel cost $20.00 a gallon. And that's not factoring in any charge rates or upgraded charging port...nothing. And since my wife works from home more now, it would take even longer for her to see any return going with a ev which she doesn't want either thank God. And on top of that, I have had discussions with insurance agents and they strongly believe that car and home insurance rates will go up as well due to how unstable these huge battery packs in the ev can become without any warning and next to impossible to extinguish.
Silveradoss573 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2022, 02:48 PM   #213
PaulsSS
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 15SS Camaro
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: US
Posts: 351
The real issue is Electric cars are just as hard on the environment as fossil fueled cars. Hydrogen power is the way to go and is insanely easy and CHEAP. But you will never see it because they can't bend us over with it. The planet is covered in hydrogen.
PaulsSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2022, 03:24 PM   #214
George-CZ

 
George-CZ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS LS3 and 1978 STROKER 383
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 1,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOT A 45 View Post
This is how we can safely run 87 in our cars. Sure if you want to race around or act like a fool premium would be better, but if you just want to drive normal like 95% of us do then 87 is fine! And NO premium fuel is not required...by law it would say so on the fuel door.

The knock sensor system enables the engine control module (ECM) to control the ignition timing for the best possible performance while protecting the engine from potentially damaging levels of detonation, also known as spark knock. The knock sensor system uses one or two flat response 2-wire sensors. The sensor uses piezo-electric crystal technology that produces an AC voltage signal of varying amplitude and frequency based on the engine vibration or noise level. The amplitude and frequency are dependant upon the level of knock that the knock sensor detects. The ECM receives the knock sensor signal through two isolated signal circuits for each knock sensor.

The control module learns a minimum noise level, or background noise, at idle from the knock sensor and uses calibrated values for the rest of the RPM range. The control module uses the minimum noise level to calculate a noise channel. A normal knock sensor signal will ride within the noise channel. As engine speed and load change, the noise channel upper and lower parameters will change to accommodate the normal knock sensor signal, keeping the signal within the channel. In order to determine which cylinders are knocking, the control module only uses knock sensor signal information when each cylinder is near top dead center (TDC) of the firing stroke. If knock is present, the signal will range outside of the noise channel.

If the control module has determined that knock is present, it will retard the ignition timing to attempt to eliminate the knock. The control module will always try to work back to a zero compensation level, or no spark retard. An abnormal knock sensor signal will stay outside of the noise channel or will not be present. knock sensor diagnostics are calibrated to detect faults with the knock sensor circuitry inside the control module, the knock sensor wiring, or the knock sensor voltage output. Some diagnostics are also calibrated to detect constant noise from an outside influence such as a loose/damaged component or excessive engine mechanical noise.
What if you have tune for premium fuel and refuel regular 87...?
Is something going to happen?
__________________
My life is a constant struggle with Camaro.

K&N CAI, Stainless Power longtubes, high flow cats, modified Ragazzon High Performance axle back, Soler Performance ported throttle body, Soler Performance throttle controller, RAM clutch adjuster, modified LS7 clutch kit, Tick Performance billet bearing support, Tick Performance remote bleeder, separate clutch reservoir, BMR trailing arms, BMR toe rods, Pedders Suspension cradle bushing inserts, Control Arm Bushings, Strut tower brace, oil catch can, Hurst T-handle shifter, 20mm wheel spacers, DBA brakes, QTP Cutouts, Dynosteve tune.
George-CZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2022, 03:29 PM   #215
NOT A 45

 
NOT A 45's Avatar
 
Drives: 13 CAMARO 2SS LS3-04 SILVERADO LS3
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: SOUTHERN MARYLAND
Posts: 801
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulsSS View Post
The real issue is Electric cars are just as hard on the environment as fossil fueled cars. Hydrogen power is the way to go and is insanely easy and CHEAP. But you will never see it because they can't bend us over with it. The planet is covered in hydrogen.
Easy? Cheap? Someone is gonna make a profit on it! Safe? see Hindenburg 1937
NOT A 45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2022, 03:30 PM   #216
NOT A 45

 
NOT A 45's Avatar
 
Drives: 13 CAMARO 2SS LS3-04 SILVERADO LS3
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: SOUTHERN MARYLAND
Posts: 801
Quote:
Originally Posted by George-CZ View Post
What if you have tune for premium fuel and refuel regular 87...?
Is something going to happen?
First thing the tuner does is modify fuel and ignition timing maps.....I wouldn't use 87 in a car that's been tuned
NOT A 45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2022, 03:38 PM   #217
George-CZ

 
George-CZ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS LS3 and 1978 STROKER 383
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 1,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOT A 45 View Post
First thing the tuner does is modify fuel and ignition timing maps.....I wouldn't use 87 in a car that's been tuned
I'm definitely not going to go to 87.
I was just wondering what would happen if it inadvertently got there.
__________________
My life is a constant struggle with Camaro.

K&N CAI, Stainless Power longtubes, high flow cats, modified Ragazzon High Performance axle back, Soler Performance ported throttle body, Soler Performance throttle controller, RAM clutch adjuster, modified LS7 clutch kit, Tick Performance billet bearing support, Tick Performance remote bleeder, separate clutch reservoir, BMR trailing arms, BMR toe rods, Pedders Suspension cradle bushing inserts, Control Arm Bushings, Strut tower brace, oil catch can, Hurst T-handle shifter, 20mm wheel spacers, DBA brakes, QTP Cutouts, Dynosteve tune.
George-CZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2022, 03:39 PM   #218
gtstorey


 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS2,L99, LSA SC
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 2,433
A lot of tuners leave a low octane map that the computer will default to when enough knock is detected.
gtstorey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2022, 03:55 PM   #219
Royal Tiger
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2013 2SS/RS Convertible
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 3,873
I had a 93 minimum tune for years. Now it’s flex and loves E.
Royal Tiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2022, 06:01 PM   #220
BehindBlueI's
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Midwest
Posts: 314
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulsSS View Post
The real issue is Electric cars are just as hard on the environment as fossil fueled cars. Hydrogen power is the way to go and is insanely easy and CHEAP. But you will never see it because they can't bend us over with it. The planet is covered in hydrogen.
Hydrogen in a usable fuel version is energy negative. Hydrogen makes sense if you have lots of cheap electricity, especially if combined with natural gas reserves. It makes little sense if you are in an oil rich nation with good refining capacity. For somewhere like Japan, it makes sense. For the US, it doesn't.

Electric cars may or may not be better for the environment, but they help in energy independence because you can make electricity from so many resources instead of being limited to just oil (and a smidgen of biomass). Coal, natural gas, "green", etc. Of course, then the question becomes can you be independent with all of the mineral requirements as well.
BehindBlueI's is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2022, 01:06 AM   #221
BRED2SSRS
 
BRED2SSRS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS RS L99
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 15
Never really complained about gas prices, especially since it just comes with the territory for these 6.2 monsters, but prices in HTX are close to $5 for 93, and it will only go up more. Makes me think twice if I want to drive the car or play around.
__________________
Roto-Fab Cold Air Intake, Resonator Delete, Flowmaster Super 10 Mufflers
BRED2SSRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2022, 10:14 AM   #222
NOT A 45

 
NOT A 45's Avatar
 
Drives: 13 CAMARO 2SS LS3-04 SILVERADO LS3
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: SOUTHERN MARYLAND
Posts: 801
Quote:
Originally Posted by BehindBlueI's View Post
Hydrogen in a usable fuel version is energy negative. Hydrogen makes sense if you have lots of cheap electricity, especially if combined with natural gas reserves. It makes little sense if you are in an oil rich nation with good refining capacity. For somewhere like Japan, it makes sense. For the US, it doesn't.

Electric cars may or may not be better for the environment, but they help in energy independence because you can make electricity from so many resources instead of being limited to just oil (and a smidgen of biomass). Coal, natural gas, "green", etc. Of course, then the question becomes can you be independent with all of the mineral requirements as well.
That is a excellent point! Batteries for these EV's as well as many other "Green" sources of energy such as wind turbines, and solar panels contain "rare earth minerals". Currently there is only 1 mine in the US extracting these metals (in California no less). Why? Because it's so environmentally destructive to access these elements! So what this green movement will result in is us being reliant on China (who could care less about the environment) and Russia (who is the world leader in nickel) So for us to become green, we will be at the mercy of our 2 biggest threats! The Liberal green movement wants to make you believe that energy independence will make us secure, but I disagree. Energy production will and did make us secure.
NOT A 45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2022, 10:56 AM   #223
Royal Tiger
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2013 2SS/RS Convertible
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 3,873
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOT A 45 View Post
That is a excellent point! Batteries for these EV's as well as many other "Green" sources of energy such as wind turbines, and solar panels contain "rare earth minerals". Currently there is only 1 mine in the US extracting these metals (in California no less). Why? Because it's so environmentally destructive to access these elements! So what this green movement will result in is us being reliant on China (who could care less about the environment) and Russia (who is the world leader in nickel) So for us to become green, we will be at the mercy of our 2 biggest threats! The Liberal green movement wants to make you believe that energy independence will make us secure, but I disagree. Energy production will and did make us secure.
Absolutely!
Royal Tiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2022, 11:03 AM   #224
Rob3D

 
Rob3D's Avatar
 
Drives: Car
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,192
Gas, electric, nuclear, solar, hamster wheels. Looks like we’re fu€ked no matter what.
Rob3D is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.