![]() |
|
|
#225 |
|
Moderator.ca
|
Direct injection negates the need for premium in the LLT V6, comparing it to a Nissan without DI is pointless.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
|
|
|
|
|
#226 |
|
Ruby & Blu Imp
Drives: 2010 LS3 2SSRS M6 & LLT RS A6 Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 293
|
I have been getting a range of 21 to 24 mpg over the last handful of fill ups with about 75% hwy driving and 2000 to 2300 rpm with hwy speed 65 to 70. It looks like if I go conservative and keep it in D rather than S it keeps the shift to lower rpm's (under 2000 rpm's and 5th or 6th gear) and thus better mileage, esp if I can keep my foot off the hard accelerations. This is in Charlotte at around 500 feet elevation and just clicked past 3000 miles on the odo...no mods yet.
__________________
Ruby
2SSRS M6 - Blown & LLT RS A6 |
|
|
|
|
|
#227 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 1LT RS Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lakewood, Colorado
Posts: 100
|
Mileage
I still have under 1500 miles but have gotten no less than 18 mpg with my foot in it mostly always and up to 21.5 with some highway driving.
LT1 RS inferno orange manual transmission. Love my car!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#228 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro LS Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Deridder, La.
Posts: 167
|
I've got 2600mi on mine and have been running only 93 octane, my average speed is like 37mph and get'n 22.9mpg. Not bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#229 |
![]() Drives: Camaro 2LT RS Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 97
|
2LT RS manual
About 1100 miles currently on the car. On one trip (45 minutes, 90% city, 10% highway) with little traffic and passive driving (shifting at low rpm), I got close to 27 mpg both ways. On my daily drive (less than 10 minutes) to work, 100% city, I only get 17 mpg if I drive passively (average speed is 20 mph). Last edited by Cyber_Gray_Autobot; 12-25-2009 at 01:06 PM. Reason: forgot to say it was manual |
|
|
|
|
|
#230 |
![]() Drives: Camaro 2LT RS Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 97
|
My manual calculations of mileage has shown that the onboard DIC calculation of fuel mileage is accurate to within 3-5% (for the 4 times that I have compared the #s). So the onboard computer gives an excellent calculation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#231 |
![]() Drives: ABM, 2LT/RS, sunroof, v6 auto Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: South of Ft Worth, Tx
Posts: 69
|
FWIW, I have a 2lt auto. I took a 1,000 mile highway road trip this past week and I was amazed... in the beginning I filled up w/ the 10% ethanol fuel that is sold here in TX, and I got 24.5 mpg highway @ 74mph average. When I used the 100% fuel (bought in OK) I got 29.6 mpg at the same speed! I am convinced that it's the fuel that makes the difference!!! On the ethanol blend I was getting @ 22.5 mpg in a mixed highway/city drive. (50/50%)
Too bad we don't get pure fuel in my area now, I'd like to see what it'd do to my mixed driving...
__________________
camarokat
2LT/RS, ABM, sunroofv6 automatic |
|
|
|
|
|
#232 |
![]() Drives: LLT MV5 B34 N65... period. Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: -
Posts: 283
|
Ethanol provides less energy per gallon, so you get lesser gas mileage burning blended fuel than you do burning pure petrol.
__________________
In the early morning... when there's only a mere suggestion that the sun is going to bother coming up at all that day - a CGM blur accompanied by the anthem of 312 horses awakens the morning commuters from their NPR-induced stupor. Charging past the front lines in an all-or-nothing battle cry that the King has returned...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#233 |
|
synergy-green with envy
Drives: Cam....ry :-( Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Douglas, MA
Posts: 280
|
I'm surprised by the somewhat low numbers in this thread . . .
I rented a 1LT automatic from Avis for a one-day test drive . . . overall average (filled the tank and did the math) I got 25.9 MPG; on a "simulated commute" with mostly highway and some off-highway cruise I got 30.5 according to the computer; in heavy stop and go I got about 18 (left the car idling for long time while I aired up the tires and that nocked it down a bit) I was not driving super agressively, but not super easy either . . . it was a "test drive" so I did get on it a bit when I had a chance; but those chances were limited by traffic. Does the automatic really get that much better mileage than the manual? |
|
|
|
|
|
#234 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 ZL1 - #670 Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Seminole, Fl.
Posts: 8,009
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#235 |
|
MJ STROH
|
Drove to Rapid City SD and back(420 miles) 20 degress, averaged over 25mpg in sport mode in my 2LTRS with 18 inch wheels with pirelli snow tires at 78 mph, just turned over 1100 miles on the car
|
|
|
|
|
|
#236 |
|
Retired
Drives: 2010 Camaro RS V6 #1301 DOB 3/23/09 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ithaca NY
Posts: 2,563
|
I have to disagree. To maximize the full potential of the high compression, Ide have to say that high octane with a tune would have to make better numbers in performance and mpg.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#237 | |
|
Moderator.ca
|
Quote:
As it is, the engine already gets the full potential of its high comression (better fuel economy and more power). I doubt a tune would be enough to force the requirement of premium. To do that you'd need either a much higher CR or moderate boost levels.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#238 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
AFAIK, it's not just the cooling effect, but the fact that the fuel doesn't need to be there until you're ready to ignite it anyway.
__________________
Removing weight has surprisingly little effect on fuel economy
Engine break-in procedure | Gear ratios 2002 GMC Sierra 4x4 5.3 (190,000 miles and going strong) 1980 Buick Lesabre family heirloom with 36,000 miles 2008 Volkswagen Rabbit 2 door I5-2.5 5spd DD lease Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pure Acetone to help Gas Mileage? | Dentyneice | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 16 | 05-13-2009 02:03 PM |
| CANADIAN GAS MILEAGE! V6 AUTO | turab16 | Canada | 29 | 05-04-2009 02:06 PM |
| V-6 mustang EPA Gas Mileage | comiskeybum | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 33 | 03-18-2009 07:05 PM |
| Massachusetts may consider mileage chip | bigralph | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 12 | 02-20-2009 09:58 PM |
| Fuel pump or bad tank of gas? | Boomer Sooner | 4th Generation Camaros | 25 | 01-02-2009 07:34 PM |