2014 COST AND AVALIABILITY

[Blu Ray]

Originally Posted by nyrfan

As much as I want a Z28, if it came like this I would never buy one. Make it a TTV8 and we are talking!

Any particular reason?

Twin Turbo V6, bettter gas mileage, weighed less, cheaper to produce, cheaper to buy, and more power than the current V8....

[PoorMansCamaro]

Originally Posted by Izach26

Any particular reason?

Twin Turbo V6, bettter gas mileage, weighed less, cheaper to produce, cheaper to buy, and more power than the current V8....

my only guess would be...it's not large enough to compensate...for....other....things....

[nyrfan]

Originally Posted by Izach26

Any particular reason?

Twin Turbo V6, bettter gas mileage, weighed less, cheaper to produce, cheaper to buy, and more power than the current V8....

I could care less about MPG's or I would not have purchased a Camaro. Cheaper to buy, who knows on that? Less weight, I'll give you that, but the weight won’t be all that significant. Compare to the current V8, we'll if you are going to that I’d still rather see a TTV8.

For me it's all about the image. I'm sorry but I don't care what you add to a V6, it's just not what "I" would consider a muscle car. To each their own I guess.

And I am not saying they should not add a TTV6 as an option, there will certainly be a market for it, just not give it the Z28 tag.

[PoorMansCamaro]

Originally Posted by daveagogo1

Only if the people behind the Aztek are allowed to name it..

I can see the Memes now..

Turbo V6 Z/28 they said

Nobody will question it they said

But it has TWO turbos they said

It's missing two cylinders WE said.

[Blu Ray]

Originally Posted by nyrfan

I could care less about MPG's or I would not have purchased a Camaro. Cheaper to buy, who knows on that? Less weight, I'll give you that, but the weight won’t be all that significant. Compare to the current V8, we'll if you are going to that I’d still rather see a TTV8.

For me it's all about the image. I'm sorry but I don't care what you add to a V6, it's just not what "I" would consider a muscle car. To each their own I guess.

I feel you.....its all about the 8

[daveagogo1]

Originally Posted by PoorMansCamaro

[HDRDTD]

Originally Posted by Izach26

How soon do you think before they hit the Showroom Floor?

How are Dealers going to be on price?

2010 Guys who brought in 2009 any insite......

:p op2:

I'm guessing the pricing won't be announced until after they are actually reveled at the end of this month at the NY auto show. Pricing will likely follow soon after or in a month or two.

Production for a new MY typically begins in June/July, so look for them in dealer showrooms this fall.

Base prices may reflect a typical modest increaseand other pricing would depend on any improvements/upgrades and or new additional options.

I'm guessing base prices will increase by $300-500 but that's only a WAG.

[Mikes SS]

Originally Posted by Izach26

Any particular reason?

Twin Turbo V6, bettter gas mileage, weighed less, cheaper to produce, cheaper to buy, and more power than the current V8....

ummmm sorry no, it will not weight less, will not be cheaper to produce and does not have more power than the current LS3..plus the LS3 sounds way cooler. Add weight for 2 turbos and plumbing, heat exchanger..there are a TON of LS3's left in a warehouse that need to be used and another reason they are going into the new SS Sedan..they would have just put the TTV6 in there if it was cost effective. Do homework.

[Blu Ray]

Originally Posted by Mikes SS

ummmm sorry no, it will not weight less, will not be cheaper to produce and does not have more power than the current LS3..plus the LS3 sounds way cooler. Add weight for 2 turbos and plumbing, heat exchanger..there are a TON of LS3's left in a warehouse that need to be used and another reason they are going into the new SS Sedan..they would have just put the TTV6 in there if it was cost effective. Do homework.

Flagged for 03/27....

[Blu Ray]

Originally Posted by Mikes SS

ummmm sorry no, it will not weight less, will not be cheaper to produce and does not have more power than the current LS3..plus the LS3 sounds way cooler. Add weight for 2 turbos and plumbing, heat exchanger..there are a TON of LS3's left in a warehouse that need to be used and another reason they are going into the new SS Sedan..they would have just put the TTV6 in there if it was cost effective. Do homework.

When did you visit this warehouse?

as you stated "TONS" could be used on the "SS" all together

[Bhobbs]

Originally Posted by Izach26

Pointless....hummmm , but follow GMs Pattern....

Follow me here..... the CTS V has\had the LSA engine 1st which made it way in to the ZL1

Caddillac CTS sedan is also going to debut the Twin 420HP 430Torque twin turbo V6 03/27 at the NY auto show

it sure it could find it way into a Camaro

this is all speculation but....

Twin Turbo V6, bettter gas mileage, weighed less, cheaper to produce, cheaper to buy, and more power

TTV6 doesn't get any better mileage than the LS3. I doubt it weighs much less, doubt it will cheaper either.

[Blu Ray]

Originally Posted by Bhobbs

TTV6 doesn't get any better mileage than the LS3. I doubt it weighs much less, doubt it will weigh less either.

??? It has not debuted yet, how do we no these things ???
:pop2 :

[Baylor16]

Originally Posted by Mikes SS

ummmm sorry no, it will not weight less, will not be cheaper to produce and does not have more power than the current LS3..plus the LS3 sounds way cooler. Add weight for 2 turbos and plumbing, heat exchanger..there are a TON of LS3's left in a warehouse that need to be used and another reason they are going into the new SS Sedan..they would have just put the TTV6 in there if it was cost effective. Do homework.

BOOM. Absolutely right, if they wanted to get rid of the Ls3 they wouldn't have put it in the new SS sedan.

[Bhobbs]

Originally Posted by Izach26

??? It has not debuted yet, how do we no these things ???
:pop2 :

The LF3 was revealed the other day. 420 HP and 430 LB*FT, 17 city, 25 highway in the 2014 CTS.