![]() |
|
|
#15 |
|
PWA Relapse
|
Seems like a good plan.
I've never really thought of it - how long is the GM's PT warranty anyway? *shuffles off to go look it up* - Xanthos
__________________
2017 1LT/RS A8 Hyper Blue Metallic |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 year 100,000 miles.
So basically I would mess with stuff like this after the warranty is up and the car is paid off. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
PWA Relapse
|
I guess 5 years isn't too long to wait to do a cam swap.
Then again, I have to wait for somebody to come out with cams for the V6 anyway. Or for GM to release the cam blanks. - Xanthos
__________________
2017 1LT/RS A8 Hyper Blue Metallic |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
![]() Drives: 67, 68, 88, 98, 10, 12 ZL1 Camaros Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: nj
Posts: 103
|
Quote:
I've worked on LSX engines for years and will tell you from first hand experence, the GM cams are crap compared to after market cams, and Comp is one of the best, but I prefer custom ground |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Danny
|
Looking at the LSX cams offered on Comp Cams website, which one could be potentially used on the L99?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
![]() Drives: 67, 68, 88, 98, 10, 12 ZL1 Camaros Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: nj
Posts: 103
|
Quote:
There are a lot of variables to take into account. I personally will probably go twin turbo. The cam will be some wheres around a 224/234 @.050 on a 114 or 116 LSA. The lift will be about .567/.580. I will use the Comp 921 dual springs, and yes the cam will be from Comp also. The LS3 heads don't like a lot of over lap. Now if i were going NA with long tube headers like kooks, I would go with a 230-240 duration on a 114 LSA with .590-.610 lift. BTW, I would make or buy a better CA intake than the GMMP POS. JMOO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
PWA Relapse
|
But would that cam keep AFM usable? I get the impression that was an implied part of his question.
- Xanthos
__________________
2017 1LT/RS A8 Hyper Blue Metallic |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() Drives: 67, 68, 88, 98, 10, 12 ZL1 Camaros Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: nj
Posts: 103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
PWA Relapse
|
Well, that certainly seems like good news!
- Xanthos
__________________
2017 1LT/RS A8 Hyper Blue Metallic |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() Drives: 2010 IOM Camaro Vin 34334 Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 566
|
No they wont unless specificaly designed for the AFM/DoD/VVT models. I dont think they have actually released these cams as of yet. The cams you mentioned for the other ls series do not take into account the VVT. As of right now they only have 4 of these cams. Here is the link to take a look. http://www.compcams.com/Technical/Ca.../pdf/page9.pdf
Edit: I stand corrected, they are able to be ordered at about $500 a piece. Last edited by Hesh; 01-08-2009 at 11:11 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
PWA Relapse
|
Quote:
- Xanthos
__________________
2017 1LT/RS A8 Hyper Blue Metallic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
![]() Drives: 2010 IOM Camaro Vin 34334 Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 566
|
Now if you wanted to its already been performed you can turn the AFM off and its basically a LS3. Why you would do that when you can keep the AFM active make great hp and still get 23 mpg...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 529
|
As far as I knew, we were the only ones that offered a specific cam that worked still retaining AFM, we did all of the development with our project G8GT vehicle 6 months ago and currently offer 2 cams that work with AFM that range from a 40-55 rwhp increase with good street manners. In order to run more than "X" amount of lift, a proprietary lobe had to be designed in which we wroked with FTI on doing and testing, hence the mentioning of this in Chevy High Performance magazine. Too much lift, and using the wrong lobe moves the lifter past the oil galley in the lifter bore. We will be doing testing on the L99 camaro as soon as we can get our hands on one as well. So, don't think you can just put any cam in this engine with nothing to worry about. Another thing we have done is getting rid of the AFM, and using slightly larger cams, and in doing so it really did not decrease the mpg much at all, only about 2 mpg on average in most scenarios, depending on how it is driven. The AFM is very much so activated based on load to an extent, plus TPS% and rpm windows, so if you drive it fairly hard, it will never come on, if you do a lot of highway driving at around 60-65 mph it will come on quite often, but generally above 70-75+ mph it will hardly come on at all because of the amount of engine load it takes to maintain this speed, unless you have a tail wind or going down a hill.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
![]() Drives: 2010 IOM Camaro Vin 34334 Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 566
|
Nope you are not the only ones. There is a link on the first page from Comp Cams that show they have also produced cams for the system. They were also mentioned in the same article you were in. They were the first cam company mentioned and one of the two mentioned to keep the afm active with a cam swap. There was quite a large portion of that article give to Comp Cams for their work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Which transmission will the L99 have? | mega | V8 and V6 Transmissions / Driveline (6L80 / 6L50 / TR6060 / AY6) | 19 | 01-08-2009 08:53 PM |
| Tuning LS3 vs L99 | Evilangel | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 17 | 10-30-2008 11:22 AM |
| L99 engine specifications | Tran | Wiki | 0 | 10-19-2008 12:40 PM |
| VVT on L99, or what? | bobscogin | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 16 | 09-29-2008 10:52 PM |
| L99 discussion | The_Blur | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 85 | 07-25-2008 03:07 PM |