Camaro SS vs. Challenger R/t vs. Mustang GT comparison - Page 2 - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

Italianwhiplash · 03-23-2009, 11:03 AM

I really Don't agree with the comment about the R/T. The Camaro Is a 6.2 liter engine...the r.t is a 5.7. A srt-8 is 6.1, and come on Mustangs have always sucked the sound they make is strictly fake in my opinion. And yes I did own a mustang in the past so im not just bashing that car, I'am a previous owner

fdjizm · 03-23-2009, 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Italianwhiplash

I really Don't agree with the comment about the R/T. The Camaro Is a 6.2 liter engine...the r.t is a 5.7. A srt-8 is 6.1, and come on Mustangs have always sucked the sound they make is strictly fake in my opinion. And yes I did own a mustang in the past so im not just bashing that car, I'am a previous owner

Awesome now you get to back up what you just said

define "mustangs have always sucked"

Kyle2k · 03-23-2009, 11:43 AM

It is funny how the R/T version was still quoted as the most expensive out of the three too.

Italianwhiplash · 03-23-2009, 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyle2k

It is funny how the R/T version was still quoted as the most expensive out of the three too.

Yup they run in the high 30's to low 40's.

Camaro Fan · 03-23-2009, 07:08 PM

Quote:

and i like the fact that all three were tested the same time, it shows the true winner being the Camaro

The print version of this comparo just spelled out what I was thinking above, they didn't test all three at the same time/same place/same driver. The numbers from the Camaro were run at GMs testing grounds, the other numbers I take it are just Edmunds' best w/ the R/T and GT.

That kinda pisses me off, the Camaro's numbers are in the freezing cold in Michigan, I bet a true same day/same track test would have the Camaro laying the smack down ever harder...

Visual_Perfection · 03-23-2009, 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAUCE

Agreed!!! Im thinkin (broke in engine) + better traction, stock this car could reach 12.9

nice vid though!!

Haha, I'm thinking more like 12.7-12.8

garagelogic · 03-23-2009, 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Visual_Perfection

Haha, I'm thinking more like 12.7-12.8

Yeah, I'm inclined to agree. If a stock 500hp GT500 can get into the 12.20-12.30 range, I don't see why the 426hp SS cannot dip into the mid-to-high twelves.

Andro · 03-23-2009, 11:33 PM

lrc250 · 03-25-2009, 02:39 PM

Is anyone else having issues with the video the OP linked to?

03-23-2009, 11:03 AM	#15
Italianwhiplash Drives: 2006 Dodge Charger r/t Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: New York Posts: 176 View My Garage	I really Don't agree with the comment about the R/T. The Camaro Is a 6.2 liter engine...the r.t is a 5.7. A srt-8 is 6.1, and come on Mustangs have always sucked the sound they make is strictly fake in my opinion. And yes I did own a mustang in the past so im not just bashing that car, I'am a previous owner __________________ 2006 Dodge Charger R/T-Heads, cam, headers,exhaust,cut outs, nitrous , intake, 1000hp axles,3.75 gears and much much more 2009 Hemi Orange Dodge Challenger SRT-8 - 6 speed, Headers, exhaust, Super Charged,SMS Supercharger, 4.10 gears, stage 5 transmission, duel clutch, and the beast under the hood A 440 CI 7.2 LITER HEMI On order victory Red 2ss RS Camaro, Parts already received ARH Headers, SLP loud Mouth I exhaust, waiting for Vortech SuperCharger.

03-23-2009, 11:43 AM	#17
Kyle2k LVL 50 Troll Stomper Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Indianapolis Posts: 3,463	It is funny how the R/T version was still quoted as the most expensive out of the three too. __________________

03-23-2009, 11:33 PM	#22
Andro NOICE!!! ™ Drives: Force Fed 427 Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: GOT BOOST? Posts: 5,213 View My Garage	__________________

03-25-2009, 02:39 PM	#23
lrc250 480 HP 2010 2SS Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Eastern, NC Posts: 325 View My Garage	Is anyone else having issues with the video the OP linked to? __________________ Without data you are just another person with an opinion. 1100 :10/15/08 3000:3/2609 3300:4/18/09 3400 (broadcast)April 25, 2009 3800 (produced):May 4, 2009 #7470 4200 (Shipped): June 1, 2009 5000 (At Dealer) June 9,2009 374.9 rwhp & 371.7 rwtq - bone stock @ 85 deg.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Do you want the Z28?	ChrisB	Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics	1616	09-05-2010 12:49 AM
Ambient lighting (ABL) - the FINAL update = LIMITED TO DOOR PANELS	CamaroScotty	5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions	338	04-15-2009 06:33 PM
Edmunds: 2010 Ford Mustang First Look	Scotsman	General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion	32	11-23-2008 10:55 PM
Challenger Priced	Design1stCode2nd	General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion	176	09-08-2008 08:33 PM
MT: Challenger and Camaro face a case of bad timing	Scotsman	General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion	16	06-03-2008 02:45 PM