Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
KPM Fuel Systems
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-29-2012, 10:43 AM   #15
JohnnyBfromPeoria

 
JohnnyBfromPeoria's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 LS M6, Black
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by WheelmanSS View Post
There is no such thing as a "butt-dyno".
Is too. Just had mine calibrated.

John B.
__________________
12 LS M6, IPF S/C, ASA GT-5 wheels, VMax PTB
1995 Mitsubishi Montero SR
1987 Dodge Raider Turbo Project
1986 Mitsubishi Montero 2.4l FI Transplant
JohnnyBfromPeoria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 11:38 AM   #16
RollaMo

 
RollaMo's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 2SS
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Rolla, MO
Posts: 1,106
Quote:
Originally Posted by WheelmanSS View Post
There is no such thing as a "butt-dyno".

More "butt-dyno" talk on this forum than any other I belong too.
__________________
1996 Corvette - LT4
2017 Camaro 2SS
2019 GMC Sierra 2500 HD
2015 Harley Davidson Ultra Limited
RollaMo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 12:50 PM   #17
atma
disco kryptonite
 
atma's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Champaign
Posts: 1,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comrando View Post
Maybe ounces.

Take the hose off the pump without activating the pump. Aim it at a measuring cup and squeeze the handle.
incorrect. this is the amount that will come out when the dispenser is not activated b/c it's designed not to let you pump fuel without paying. however, if you were the remove the nozzle and it empty it as well as the hose into a bucket, you would get somewhere around 1/4 of a gallon (i'm just estimating, never actually measured it). I work on this kind of stuff all the time, so yeah, you're gonna get a li'l bit of Regular mixed in with your Premium if the person before you pumped Regular. The way to avoid this is to find a station that has a separate hose and nozzle for each product grade. Then the only thing that's ever been pumped through that hanging hardware is the product you're purchasing.
__________________
atma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 01:40 PM   #18
slick rick
SoCal Mayhem
 
slick rick's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 1SS/RS
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Foothill Ranch, CA
Posts: 5,488
People are still debating this when there's an official bulletin from GM about it?

#PIP4728: Higher Than Expected 0-60 MPH (97 KPH) Acceleration Time- (Nov 4, 2009)
__________________
slick rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 02:00 PM   #19
WheelmanSS
Logic is dead
 
WheelmanSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,804
Send a message via AIM to WheelmanSS
Quote:
Originally Posted by slick rick View Post
People are still debating this when there's an official bulletin from GM about it?

#PIP4728: Higher Than Expected 0-60 MPH (97 KPH) Acceleration Time- (Nov 4, 2009)
Ok, let's take a look at this "bulletin"

Quote:
The following diagnosis might be helpful if the vehicle exhibits the symptom(s) described in this PI.

Condition/Concern:
Some customers may complain of higher than expected 0-60 MPH (97 KPH) acceleration times when hot ambient temperatures are present. In some cases, they may report 0-60 times around 7 seconds.

This may be the result of the vehicle being filled with regular grade unleaded gasoline at one time. If the vehicle has been filled with regular unleaded gasoline, the ECM may be compensating for the lower octane by retarding the ignition timing during certain driving conditions

Recommendation/Instructions:
If SI diagnosis does not isolate the cause of this concern, perform the suggestions below if the customer wants the best performance from their Camaro:

•In an area where it is legal to do so, take a snapshot of a 0-60 WOT acceleration event and compare the vehicle speed parameter to the snapshot timer to determine the 0-60 MPH time.
•Determine what gasoline octane the customer has been filling the vehicle with.
• 2a. If they have never used anything but premium unleaded with a posted octane of 93 or higher, go to step 3.

• 2b. If they occasionally use regular or mid-grade gasoline, the gasoline must be removed from the tank and it must be refilled with fuel of 93 octane or greater. This can be done by advising the customer to switch to premium fuel of 93 octane or greater and returning after a few tanks of premium fuel have been consumed. Or, if immediate results are necessary, drain the fuel tank, refill it with premium fuel of 93 octane or greater, and drive the vehicle at least 15 miles to purge the old fuel out of the fuel lines.

•Reprogram the ECM with the latest TIS2Web calibrations to reset the ECM adapts. Normally this reset can also be accomplished by pulling the 2 main ECM fuses (F13R and F20U) shown in the ECM Power, Ground, MIL, and Serial Data Schematic (SI Document # 2209065).
•In an area where it is legal to do so, take another snapshot of a 0-60 WOT acceleration event and compare it to the original snapshot to determine if the 0-60 MPH time has increased. If an increase is noted, advise the customer that they should only use premium unleaded gasoline with a posted octane rating of 93 or higher to continue getting the best performance from their Camaro. This is outlined on page 8-45 of the owner's manual. GM Connect Message G_0000037144 was also sent out on 9/2/2009 about filling stock units with premium gasoline. Please follow this diagnostic or repair process thoroughly and complete each step. If the condition exhibited is resolved without completing every step, the remaining steps do not need to be performed.

GM bulletins are intended for use by professional technicians, NOT a "do-it-yourselfer". They are written to inform these technicians of conditions that may occur on some vehicles, or to provide information that could assist in the proper service of a vehicle. Properly trained technicians have the equipment, tools, safety instructions, and know-how to do a job properly and safely. If a condition is described, DO NOT assume that the bulletin applies to your vehicle, or that your vehicle will have that condition. See your GM dealer for information on whether your vehicle may benefit from the information.
The whole bulletin is mere quick trouble-shooting details for technicians doing due diligence. The computer of a vehicle is and always should be learning and adapting. If this was a wide spread, sure-thing that happened whenever someone filled up with a different grade of gas, they would have made necessary and permanent changes to the default fuel tables.
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS/RS (LS3)
573 RWHP 498 RWTQ
- Vortech V3 Supercharger
- Kooks Stepped Headers, Magnaflow 16580
- Suspension by Pfadt, Hotchkis.

2007 Trailblazer SS- Sold
2001 Trans Am WS6 431 RWHP 408 RWTQ - Sold
1994 Camaro Z28 - Sold
WheelmanSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 04:33 PM   #20
rberns


 
rberns's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,291
All that matters WheelmanSS, is the fuse pull has worked for so many of us here on this site. Just because it doesn't work for you doesn't mean the fuse pull is a make believe miracle to getting our sluggish cars performing where they should be after lower octane levels have been replaced by higher octane. This topic is very debateable, but if so many people are noticing a difference then one would incur that this fuse pull is doing something. Even in the thread of fuse pull, one of the guys on this site to GM and they themselves had talked about technicians reflashing the system to relearn a higher octane, or incase what we did save our own money and pull 2 fuses and get the same effect.
__________________
2011 Camaro 2SS/RS, Circle D 3200, ADM Transmission Cooler, BTR Valvetrain, Cam Motion .621 .595 228/244 113+4, ARH 1 7/8 full exhaust, Cold Air Inductions, Katech C5R TC, Melling HV, BTR SLR lifters, Trunion Upgrade, LS2 Dampner, LS9 head gaskets, Bo White PTB, MM can, GFX, Subs, B&M Deep transmission pan,
Holley fuel rail, Proform valve covers, relocated coil packs
rberns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 04:37 PM   #21
WheelmanSS
Logic is dead
 
WheelmanSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,804
Send a message via AIM to WheelmanSS
Fair enough. All I'm saying is that it is not a sure-thing. I don't want people to get a false hope.

My car had some miles on it when I bought it. The dealer admittedly said they had put regular gas in. I wasn't impressed with the stock performance with my car. I had a feeling this "fuse pull" thing wouldn't make a difference knowing how a car's computer worked. And sure enough, I was right. There was no significant change after I tried said fuse pull.

Just saying.
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS/RS (LS3)
573 RWHP 498 RWTQ
- Vortech V3 Supercharger
- Kooks Stepped Headers, Magnaflow 16580
- Suspension by Pfadt, Hotchkis.

2007 Trailblazer SS- Sold
2001 Trans Am WS6 431 RWHP 408 RWTQ - Sold
1994 Camaro Z28 - Sold
WheelmanSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 04:41 PM   #22
Birm
 
Birm's Avatar
 
Drives: Florida Speed & Power
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pinellas Park, FL
Posts: 3,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by WheelmanSS View Post
Fair enough. All I'm saying is that it is not a sure-thing. I don't want people to get a false hope.

My car had some miles on it when I bought it. The dealer admittedly said they had put regular gas in. I wasn't impressed with the stock performance with my car. I had a feeling this "fuse pull" thing wouldn't make a difference knowing how a car's computer worked. And sure enough, I was right. There was no significant change after I tried said fuse pull.

Just saying.


I concur. Never worked for me, not saying it doesnt, just saw no difference on mine.
Birm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 07:54 PM   #23
slick rick
SoCal Mayhem
 
slick rick's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 1SS/RS
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Foothill Ranch, CA
Posts: 5,488
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birm View Post


I concur. Never worked for me, not saying it doesnt, just saw no difference on mine.
Curious...

are you saying you (or someone else) put 87 octane in your tank and you didn't notice a degrade in performance?

And then you ran a few tanks of 91 or 93 and did the fuse pull and didn't notice any improvement in performance?

__________________
slick rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 09:20 PM   #24
SPCBA


 
Drives: pleather and Chiclets
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: a line somwhere
Posts: 4,206
I am not sure all cars get stuck on the lower octane table, or if it is even an issue with current model year. I can tell you my 2010 bought in summer 09 did get stuck, the dealer put 87 in it. When I first started reading this forum I saw a thread about it. I did the fuse pull plus battery and it changed my car drastically.
SPCBA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 04:54 AM   #25
BlueRay-J
 
BlueRay-J's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro SS Convertible
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Farmington Hills, Michigan
Posts: 280
Quote:
Originally Posted by atma View Post
incorrect. this is the amount that will come out when the dispenser is not activated b/c it's designed not to let you pump fuel without paying. however, if you were the remove the nozzle and it empty it as well as the hose into a bucket, you would get somewhere around 1/4 of a gallon (i'm just estimating, never actually measured it). I work on this kind of stuff all the time, so yeah, you're gonna get a li'l bit of Regular mixed in with your Premium if the person before you pumped Regular. The way to avoid this is to find a station that has a separate hose and nozzle for each product grade. Then the only thing that's ever been pumped through that hanging hardware is the product you're purchasing.
There is almost a full gallon in the hose. I managed 2 amaco stations 15 yrs ago. After replacing the hose, I would have to fill it so the customer didn't get charged for that gallon. I was surprised that it took about .94 gallons.

Edit- I did more research and perhaps I've remembered incorrectly. Most Internet info points to about a third of a gallon in the hose . Either my memory fails me, or perhaps they are only considering the hose, and there is additional plumbing in the pump that holds fuel for the line. Each grade had its own hose back then, so you at least received 100 % of the grade you paid for.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

Last edited by BlueRay-J; 11-30-2012 at 05:12 AM.
BlueRay-J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 04:57 AM   #26
rberns


 
rberns's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,291
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueRay-J View Post
There is almost a full gallon in the hose. I managed 2 amaco stations 15 yrs ago. After replacing the hose, I would have to fill it so the customer didn't get charged for that gallon. I was surprised that it took about .94 gallons.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
Very interesting. Never thought about this before. Luckily, I believe the station I go to has a separate line for the premium fuel.
__________________
2011 Camaro 2SS/RS, Circle D 3200, ADM Transmission Cooler, BTR Valvetrain, Cam Motion .621 .595 228/244 113+4, ARH 1 7/8 full exhaust, Cold Air Inductions, Katech C5R TC, Melling HV, BTR SLR lifters, Trunion Upgrade, LS2 Dampner, LS9 head gaskets, Bo White PTB, MM can, GFX, Subs, B&M Deep transmission pan,
Holley fuel rail, Proform valve covers, relocated coil packs
rberns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 10:06 AM   #27
tonyko1
Banned
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS Convertible, IBM
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hercules View Post
What fuse numbers do you pull for this?
Any, it really doesn't matter.
tonyko1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 10:44 AM   #28
mattsfirstSS

 
mattsfirstSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 1SS/RS L99
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Wilmington. NC
Posts: 794
guess i better never pump only one gallon of "93" into the camaro or I may only be running 87 octane. Better pump at least 2 gallons huh so i get 90?
__________________
(this was a joke, this was only a joke, If this had been an actual comment, the comment you just read would have been followed by or nothing at all)
mattsfirstSS is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.