![]() |
|
|
#15 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 LS M6, Black Join Date: May 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,045
|
Is too. Just had mine calibrated.
John B.
__________________
1995 Mitsubishi Montero SR 1987 Dodge Raider Turbo Project 1986 Mitsubishi Montero 2.4l FI Transplant |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 2SS Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Rolla, MO
Posts: 1,106
|
More "butt-dyno" talk on this forum than any other I belong too.
__________________
1996 Corvette - LT4
2017 Camaro 2SS 2019 GMC Sierra 2500 HD 2015 Harley Davidson Ultra Limited |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
disco kryptonite
|
incorrect. this is the amount that will come out when the dispenser is not activated b/c it's designed not to let you pump fuel without paying. however, if you were the remove the nozzle and it empty it as well as the hose into a bucket, you would get somewhere around 1/4 of a gallon (i'm just estimating, never actually measured it). I work on this kind of stuff all the time, so yeah, you're gonna get a li'l bit of Regular mixed in with your Premium if the person before you pumped Regular. The way to avoid this is to find a station that has a separate hose and nozzle for each product grade. Then the only thing that's ever been pumped through that hanging hardware is the product you're purchasing.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
SoCal Mayhem
Drives: 2010 Camaro 1SS/RS Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Foothill Ranch, CA
Posts: 5,488
|
People are still debating this when there's an official bulletin from GM about it?
![]() #PIP4728: Higher Than Expected 0-60 MPH (97 KPH) Acceleration Time- (Nov 4, 2009)
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||
|
Logic is dead
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS/RS (LS3)
573 RWHP 498 RWTQ - Vortech V3 Supercharger - Kooks Stepped Headers, Magnaflow 16580 - Suspension by Pfadt, Hotchkis. 2007 Trailblazer SS- Sold 2001 Trans Am WS6 431 RWHP 408 RWTQ - Sold 1994 Camaro Z28 - Sold |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
All that matters WheelmanSS, is the fuse pull has worked for so many of us here on this site. Just because it doesn't work for you doesn't mean the fuse pull is a make believe miracle to getting our sluggish cars performing where they should be after lower octane levels have been replaced by higher octane. This topic is very debateable, but if so many people are noticing a difference then one would incur that this fuse pull is doing something. Even in the thread of fuse pull, one of the guys on this site to GM and they themselves had talked about technicians reflashing the system to relearn a higher octane, or incase what we did save our own money and pull 2 fuses and get the same effect.
__________________
2011 Camaro 2SS/RS, Circle D 3200, ADM Transmission Cooler, BTR Valvetrain, Cam Motion .621 .595 228/244 113+4, ARH 1 7/8 full exhaust, Cold Air Inductions, Katech C5R TC, Melling HV, BTR SLR lifters, Trunion Upgrade, LS2 Dampner, LS9 head gaskets, Bo White PTB, MM can, GFX, Subs, B&M Deep transmission pan,
Holley fuel rail, Proform valve covers, relocated coil packs |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Logic is dead
|
Fair enough. All I'm saying is that it is not a sure-thing. I don't want people to get a false hope.
My car had some miles on it when I bought it. The dealer admittedly said they had put regular gas in. I wasn't impressed with the stock performance with my car. I had a feeling this "fuse pull" thing wouldn't make a difference knowing how a car's computer worked. And sure enough, I was right. There was no significant change after I tried said fuse pull. Just saying.
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS/RS (LS3)
573 RWHP 498 RWTQ - Vortech V3 Supercharger - Kooks Stepped Headers, Magnaflow 16580 - Suspension by Pfadt, Hotchkis. 2007 Trailblazer SS- Sold 2001 Trans Am WS6 431 RWHP 408 RWTQ - Sold 1994 Camaro Z28 - Sold |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Drives: Florida Speed & Power Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pinellas Park, FL
Posts: 3,185
|
Quote:
![]() I concur. Never worked for me, not saying it doesnt, just saw no difference on mine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
SoCal Mayhem
Drives: 2010 Camaro 1SS/RS Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Foothill Ranch, CA
Posts: 5,488
|
Quote:
are you saying you (or someone else) put 87 octane in your tank and you didn't notice a degrade in performance? And then you ran a few tanks of 91 or 93 and did the fuse pull and didn't notice any improvement in performance?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: pleather and Chiclets Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: a line somwhere
Posts: 4,206
|
I am not sure all cars get stuck on the lower octane table, or if it is even an issue with current model year. I can tell you my 2010 bought in summer 09 did get stuck, the dealer put 87 in it. When I first started reading this forum I saw a thread about it. I did the fuse pull plus battery and it changed my car drastically.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
![]() Drives: 2013 Camaro SS Convertible Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Farmington Hills, Michigan
Posts: 280
|
Quote:
Edit- I did more research and perhaps I've remembered incorrectly. Most Internet info points to about a third of a gallon in the hose . Either my memory fails me, or perhaps they are only considering the hose, and there is additional plumbing in the pump that holds fuel for the line. Each grade had its own hose back then, so you at least received 100 % of the grade you paid for. Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2 Last edited by BlueRay-J; 11-30-2012 at 05:12 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
2011 Camaro 2SS/RS, Circle D 3200, ADM Transmission Cooler, BTR Valvetrain, Cam Motion .621 .595 228/244 113+4, ARH 1 7/8 full exhaust, Cold Air Inductions, Katech C5R TC, Melling HV, BTR SLR lifters, Trunion Upgrade, LS2 Dampner, LS9 head gaskets, Bo White PTB, MM can, GFX, Subs, B&M Deep transmission pan,
Holley fuel rail, Proform valve covers, relocated coil packs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS Convertible, IBM Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 Camaro 1SS/RS L99 Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Wilmington. NC
Posts: 794
|
guess i better never pump only one gallon of "93" into the camaro or I may only be running 87 octane. Better pump at least 2 gallons huh so i get 90?
__________________
(this was a joke, this was only a joke, If this had been an actual comment, the comment you just read would have been followed by
![]() ![]() or nothing at all) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|