![]() |
|
|
#15 | |
![]() Drives: BRM 2SS/RS 1LE Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Detroit
Posts: 113
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | ||
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 11,926
|
Quote:
Quote:
Your ass can give you pinpoint rwhp numbers? ![]() Quit while your somewhat ahead. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() Drives: 2013 victory red 2ss rs 1le Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: lockport, il.
Posts: 36
|
butt dyno was a joke obviously. I fear the backlash of some members when I put in the cam and heads and post the dyno results if there a few hp higher then they should be. my goal is 500 hp at tire on motor and maybe and a lil boost by next spring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 1LE Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: DMV
Posts: 1,548
|
I have to laugh. These threads are becoming pointless. I love seeing results the dyno results. I think we have proven the '13 cars are a making a little more than the 12's and before. On average about 10-15 more Hp. Some of the die hards automatically assume its a bad dyno operator or happy dyno. Because there is no way these cars could have less parasitic losses and unsprung weight than the previous LS3 equipped cars. It is really getting old. What is the point of coming into every dyno thread and telling the op they are wrong because the dyno gave a different number from what they expected. We get it! It's a tuning tool! Now let people enjoy their moment and stop trying to ruin it for them!
/rant
__________________
It's a Dingledarm. It's there to dampen side fumbling. If your marzelvanes fumble too much they can cause total protonic reversal. It gets ugly from there. This is really the biggest problem with the new Camaro. That and the tri-pronged blivot.
Delivered 21 Jan 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Banned
Drives: ss camaro Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: usa
Posts: 876
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() Drives: 2013 victory red 2ss rs 1le Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: lockport, il.
Posts: 36
|
could not have said it better myself newb. reading some of the dyno results from a couple months ago regarding 2013 1le posts . if your 2013 threw down 390 you were getting grilled, if some how you hit the" magic" stock 400 hp, look out you will get crucified. from what I have seen just maybe these 2013 put out a lil better. call me crazy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | ||
|
NEC5 C-HOLE CHAMP
Drives: 2013 camaro 2SS/RS 1LE 1 of 221 Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: MYSTIC CT
Posts: 562
|
Quote:
![]() were all fellow camaro enthusiast just exchanging info and stories the guy posted his dyno sheet... no need to castrate him Quote:
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
xquest91x
Drives: 2012 45th Anniversary 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Yuma, AZ
Posts: 535
|
I just dyno my car( on a dyno com ) and it came at 364HP & 343TQ and all I have is JBA exhaust but it was 95-100 degrees outside so I'm sure it can maybe do alil more in cooler weather but I did it cause it was a free dyno
I have my kooks LT headers w/cats , CAI , VMax TB, and maybe a tune on the way just waiting for arrival. Can anyone guess on how much ill dyno at after those mods? I'm hoping for 420-425HP & 390-400 TQ, am I off by much?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 2SS/RS/1LE Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: St Louis, MO
Posts: 3,087
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
2013 Camaro SS1LECTSVZ28
Drives: 2013 AGM 1SS/1LE Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Suburbs of Detroit, MI
Posts: 2,440
|
Quote:
If you call Motor City speak with Rich G. If you call Pure Tuning speak with Keith or Aaron. Drop my name at either place (under my screen name ) I have know them all of them for years. Matt.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2019 GT350 Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
|
Quote:
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang 2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock 2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s 2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s 2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned 1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
2013 Camaro SS1LECTSVZ28
Drives: 2013 AGM 1SS/1LE Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Suburbs of Detroit, MI
Posts: 2,440
|
Quote:
EDIT...I just got 114mph with 3800lbs.....but you need a driver so 4000lbs should be more realistic.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Want a gen 6 Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: 75089
Posts: 1,032
|
Motortrend pulled a 12.7 sec @ 111.8 mph bone stock, so 112 sounds
pretty low. http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...k/viewall.html And this 2010 M6 LG car with DR's and 427rwhp pulled an 11.8 @ 121; see the run in the last 12 seconds of the video. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|