01-15-2014, 07:30 PM | #15 |
Drives: - Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: South Bay Area, CA
Posts: 7
|
Thanks for the replies!
It's true that most of them are my personal opinion, that's why I want to know yours too To be honest, the most thing that bothers me is, why does the Charger has way "cheaper" price than the Camaro? I mean for the same price I can get a more well-equipped and more powerful engine... I thought it must be something related to the brand itself, which made me thought Dodge is not as reliable as Chevy, or its value may drop off a cliff for a couple years (I'm planning to use it for around 4-5yrs), in this case. Even a lot of my relatives just "skipped" or "avoided" Chrysler Group (chrysler, dodge, ram, etc.) cars when they were looking for a new car. I also have heard the issue of the Pentastar engine... Anyway, I agree that the new chargers look really great, though. If I decide to get it, I'll get the 100th Anniversary Edition But the Camaros are still more eye-catching than the Chargers they attract more people's attention (including mine of course ) , As for the suggestion on getting a used one, let me know if you've seen one in my area, I can't find a 2013 in my area :( Thanks! |
01-15-2014, 09:50 PM | #16 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS M6 Black Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Bremerton, WA
Posts: 582
|
I looked at Chargers a bit before getting my Camaro and frankly, imo, I made the right choice. It's all down to preference really, but for me the manual transmission was a must and the Charger didn't even offer it. They're nice cars though (esp the newest models).
|
01-16-2014, 02:54 PM | #17 |
Drives: 2012 2LT RS Rally Yellow Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 46
|
Here's my opinion. I have a 2012 Charger V6 (SXT) and a 2012 Camaro V6 2LT/RS (wife's). The Charger has a different ride and I'm not saying it in a bad way. The ride is smoother and won't jar your kidneys although it's still very stable and responsive. We originally purchased the Charger because it can comfortable seat our family of 5. The Camaro not so much. The Camaro is harder to get in and out of and the controls for radio/interior is not as straight forward (Seems like the electronics were and afterthought). The Bluetooth also doesn't sound as well. The R/T Charger will be quicker but, not by a whole lot. At least not as much as others may think. The car weighs around 500 lbs more and only has about 20 more hp, but quite a bit more torque. Insurance for the Charger will also be more because of the V8 and R/T badge. I do like both platforms but, for different reasons. Reliability will be similar possibly and edge to the Charger since the motor has been around for while longer. All of your other points seem spot on. Visibility in the Camaro is tough but, with the backup camera, it's fine. If you have questions, please let me know.
|
01-17-2014, 04:01 PM | #18 | |
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
You're problem is that you have heard a lot of incorrect information about Chrysler. Mine have been the most reliable cars i have owned and I have owned a LOT of GM cars too. Also, what pentastar V6 issues? From what i have seen they are extremely reliable (there was an early recall in 11 for a bad batch, but most hadn't even been sold and were replaced before a customer even got their hands on them, but that is it). The LX cars easily hold their values as well as the Camaro. Anyways, diver them both and buy the one that you like best.
Quote:
|
|
01-17-2014, 04:05 PM | #19 | |
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
|
|
01-17-2014, 04:23 PM | #20 |
10-bolt Destroyer
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS - AGM, LS3/6M Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canukistan
Posts: 860
|
Youre getting ripped off if youre spending 33k on a V6 camaro...
ppl on here have got SS 1LE's for 32-36k OTD ALL IN. Keep looking...
__________________
2012 Camaro 2SS/RS - LS3/TR6060: Cam, Headers, Exhaust, Intake, Gears, Twin Disk, Suspension, Tuned - 475rwhp, 443rwtq |
01-18-2014, 06:59 AM | #21 |
Drives: 2012 2LT RS Rally Yellow Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 46
|
Stew, here's a few facts you can find on the web. The V6 camaro 1/4 mile (14.2), the SS 13.2, the charger R/t 13.9. The SS by a leading company report should beat the R/T. This isn't me or my opinion. But, it's still a drivers race. As for the difference between the cars mentioned in this post. The weight difference (again not me), the V6 Camaro weighs 3800 and the Charger R/T 4253 lbs. So I wasn't too far off by a guess. Horsepower to weight, the camaro wins by a small margin but, the advantage easily goes to the Charger. The earlier chargers had only 340hp. If you were looking at the all wheel drive, the 1/4 mile times are even slower.
I do have both cars with the V6. I like the Camaro on curvy roads because it handles much better but for a daily driver, the Charger is nicer. That my 2 cents. |
01-18-2014, 05:32 PM | #22 |
Drives: 2013 A6 GT 5.0 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 2,909
|
I just did a quick search and you can get a brand new Charger RT for as little as 24K and a brand new Camaro SS for as little as 31K. You just have to shop around. I wouldn't consider the V6 for 33k.
__________________
BLK/BLK 1SS/RS Ordered 11-01-2009 Took delivery 12-22-2009. Heads/cam/converter/bolt ons. SOLD Feb 2015 to fund 6th gen LT1 SS with 8L90E.
|
01-18-2014, 05:39 PM | #23 | |
Drives: - Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: South Bay Area, CA
Posts: 7
|
Quote:
I put some options, so..... |
|
01-18-2014, 06:18 PM | #24 |
Drives: 2013 A6 GT 5.0 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 2,909
|
Personally I would take a 1SS over a loaded V6 any day but that's just me and the RT can be had pretty loaded for 33K and that was what I was trying to get at.
__________________
BLK/BLK 1SS/RS Ordered 11-01-2009 Took delivery 12-22-2009. Heads/cam/converter/bolt ons. SOLD Feb 2015 to fund 6th gen LT1 SS with 8L90E.
|
01-18-2014, 10:00 PM | #25 |
Banned
Drives: 2012 SS Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: H-Town
Posts: 23
|
R/T FTW
V8 > V6 |
01-19-2014, 06:11 AM | #26 | |
Drives: 2019 GT350 Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
|
Quote:
If you have to have new a 1SS with a few options should be 31k. The Charger RT while a bit underpowered IMO is still a very nice car, great looks, and interior.
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang 2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock 2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s 2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s 2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned 1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot |
|
01-20-2014, 01:19 AM | #27 |
Drives: 2013 Mustang 5.0 Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,788
|
I beat a R/T pretty well the other day
__________________
Performance Mods: Vararam Intake, MRTv2.0 exhaust, Elite Engineering CC, Vmax Black Iceolator, Vmax Ported TB, OBX LT Headers w/ no CATS, LMR Tune
Visual mods: Eagle Eyes w/5k hids, Custom Hood Spears, Heritage Grille, Stage 2 LED Dome lights,Transformer Emblems, PD Bezels, 19in Chevy rims with pirellis, Blue painted calipers, GM GFX Front Splitter, 35/20 % Tint, TailLight Tint(charcoal) 1/4 Mile: 13.65 sec @ 102.53 mph R.I.P. |
01-20-2014, 06:37 AM | #28 |
2013 Super Bee
Drives: 2013 Super Bee Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Jacksonville FL.
Posts: 711
|
The Daytona R/T's were pretty damn nice. Could have gotten a 13 real cheap when they were having DEEP incentives on the 13's.
__________________
2007 Procharged SRT8 Charger..........SOLD
2010 Mopar 10 Challenger.................SOLD 2010 R/T Classic Challenger...............SOLD 2011 392 Challenger.........................SOLD 2012 mid 10 second 1/4 mile GT500.... SOLD Current ride 100% stock 2013 Plum SuperBee............best of 12.407 @ 114.28 for now. Tune, CAI and Drag radials. Best of 12.00 @ 115.74 |
|
|
|
|