![]() |
|
|
#15 |
|
Future Mopar Owner
Drives: 2011, 2SS/RS, Synergy Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: TN
Posts: 2,373
|
When will we have the results and price whether good or bad?
__________________
2005 GTO-IBM-A4-Sold
2011 Camaro SS/RS Synergy-1 of 255-Sold You will be missed but you are in good hands! 2019 Challenger Hellcat B5, Redeye, Widebody |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 2SS Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 931
|
I'm in for 30hp. LoL
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() |
I have a 2010 SLP ZL454 with a Varam.I would like to hear more on this too!Ill be a tester!Just had dynoed 377 and 391.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Future Mopar Owner
Drives: 2011, 2SS/RS, Synergy Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: TN
Posts: 2,373
|
Bump
__________________
2005 GTO-IBM-A4-Sold
2011 Camaro SS/RS Synergy-1 of 255-Sold You will be missed but you are in good hands! 2019 Challenger Hellcat B5, Redeye, Widebody |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
instigator
Drives: 2020 6.2 Trail Boss, 2022 XC90 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: 72034
Posts: 3,979
|
I can tell you where you can test two platforms pretty darn quick...GPI...hit up Rhino79. My ls6 cts-v is going in soon and his camaro is a record holder for its mods...also been on lsxtv recently. By the time you are ready to test I should have my car with heads cam and a fast102 on it (ls2 tb). His car is ready to go now with a Vararam and he posted the gains he had here last time with just the intake change.
__________________
-John S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
|
Any info on potential pricing for this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
![]() Drives: 2016 2SS Camaro Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 514
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 2SS Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 931
|
I'm about to put the heads on the car. I'll do this intake at the same time. We'll see how it does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() Drives: 1989 GTA Trans Am Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 610
|
I assume it is going to have ports for the power brakes, PCV, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Older Than Dirt
Drives: 2010 & 2013 Camaros Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 4,686
|
Interestingly, it says NOTHING about fitting a Camaro. Go back and read the article. I would hope they'd be working on an underhood Camaro version, if that particular version doesn't fit already. Just sayin'.
__________________
2010 2SS TE, 1 of 822/2013 Camaro ZL1 vert, 1 of 54
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 2SS Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 931
|
The Camaro is all I'm worried about. LoL
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
im wondering how this would compare to the FAST or just a ported OE manifold. it would have to be a lot cheaper than the FAST and out perform the ported OE. not to mention, its ugly as sin lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 2SS Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 931
|
I believe the claims were 50hp? Something like that. The other thread says the number they were claiming. I'd give up a few ft lbs down low for the 50 up top.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
for 50hp ill deal with the uglyness of it haha. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|