![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What will it be!...once and for all? | |||
| SS with LS3 – 430 +hp |
|
8 | 7.92% |
| SS with L76 (Super Charged) – 500 +hp |
|
6 | 5.94% |
| SS with LSA (Super Charged) – 550 +hp |
|
32 | 31.68% |
| SS/Z28 with LS3 (Super Charged) – 575 +hp |
|
11 | 10.89% |
| Z/28 with LS3 – 400 +hp (Sport Tuned) |
|
12 | 11.88% |
| Z/28 with LS4 (Super Charged) – 475 +hp (Sport Tuned) |
|
2 | 1.98% |
| Z/28 with LS8 (Super Charged) – 530 +hp (Sport Tuned) |
|
16 | 15.84% |
| Z/28/SS with LS7 (Super Charged) – 545 +hp (Sport Tuned) |
|
4 | 3.96% |
| SS/RS (Z/28-AWD) LS9 (Super Charged) – 600+hp |
|
10 | 9.90% |
| Voters: 101. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#15 |
|
Michelin Man Assassin
Drives: '10 IBM 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Lone Star State
Posts: 217
|
I chose the SS LSA because to me, it just makes sense. It would be more cost effective to expand its use to the Camaro rather than develop a brand new motor or use one such as the LS9 that employs exotic components.
As far as the name game, and this is just MHO, while the Z/28 was the top dog back in the day, there has been no mention by anyone at GM that this trim level will even exist. Furthermore, I believe that modern day society associates the SS moniker with the top dog performance model (think 4th gen, TBSS, any other model GM has stuck that badge on recently). As much as I believe GM wants to revive the Z/28 as the HIPO model, I believe that the SS will hold that position for marketing reasons.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
36.58625, -121.7568
|
somebody post a link to information regarding the LSA, i apparently don't know crap about this engine...thanx
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Moderator
|
This is not a question that can be polled. It's not up to us. It's up to Chevrolet. Names don't matter. Just give me my 400 horses!
__________________
RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet//
Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN. warn 145:159 ban |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() Drives: 1969 RS Camaro Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Albany OR
Posts: 198
|
My two cents... Would not think you would have a combined performance package such as the Z/28 and the SS. No sense there but that does not mean anything. GM is bringing back the ZR1 as the big dog for the Corvettes and I think that there is enough nostalgia left in the GM ranks that they would lean towards the Z/28 as the Full Meal Deal. I am a first Gen guy so that is what I am heavily relying on, for better or worse. Who knows... maybe they will just call the base V8 the SS and go for the gusto and pull the ZL1 in as the commander in chief of the Camaro line. All aluminum tire shredder... I would not mind parking that in my garage next to my 69 RS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() Drives: 05 Honda Accord V6 Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Palm Beach FL
Posts: 87
|
im pretty sure the LSA is a detuned/smaller supercharger version of the LS9
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
ZL1 #140
Drives: Camaros: 68 SS, 10 2SS/RS, 12 ZL1 Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 594
|
Quote:
It's like a detuned LS9. Some of the internals are weaker so I'm personnaly a little leary of how it will stand up to mods like a pulley change or better Super Charger. As far as the poll, Why does the "Top Dog" have to be chosen from Z28, SS, or RS options? Who's going to be the Shelby, Saleen, or Roush for the Camaro? Anyone wana make a prediction on SLP or Lingenfelter? Wouldn't an arrangment between GM and those guys help Gm with the CAFE requirements? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
36.58625, -121.7568
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 68 Camaro 327ci 2SS/RS 376ci LS3 Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Prince William, VA
Posts: 2,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() Drives: 1999 z28 Vert Black/Black Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 176
|
Uggggggg please take out the LS4 and LS7 since we know those are definately off the table..........
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Moderator
|
Just to mix things up, how do you like these?
• Camaro: 260 hp (I4 turbo) • Camaro S: 300 hp (V6) • Camaro RS: appearance package (add to anything) • Camaro Z28: 400 hp (LS3) • Camaro SS: 495 hp (LS7) • Camaro USSDS*: 1000 hp (13.6L 32-valve Cadillac V16) *USSDS—Unholy Supreme Super Duper Sport
__________________
RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet//
Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN. warn 145:159 ban Last edited by The_Blur; 04-16-2008 at 02:56 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() Drives: 94 Pontiac Firebird Formula Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 247
|
I just read the autoblog article on the LSA and how it compares to the LS9. and I was just floored by the specs that were explained in grave detail and the photos that were displayed and I must say.. I AM IN LOVE!
I read on how it is using less 150kPa to maintain its power and airflow. That is very impressive! I am still learning as I go when it comes to HIPO engines, but that is why I have you guys (and a thesaurus). I am looking at the location of the altenator and it is bringing back memories of my 95 Monte Carlo Z34. To change it, the axle boot(well also depending on one's tools) has to be broken down. Well that is what I experienced, but this one may be different. Not that it would be an issue, the engine looks awesome, and that supercharger, My thing, how much would this bad boy cost? If the price is obtainable, I may have to re-cast my vote! |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
ZL1 #140
Drives: Camaros: 68 SS, 10 2SS/RS, 12 ZL1 Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 594
|
Quote:
Of course that would plop it right into the middle of the Nissan GT-R vs Corvette ZR1 battle currently brewing over Nurburgring lap times and not making the Corvette ZR1 look any better than it is today... How would an AWD Camaro Z28 go over? (If our dreams were answered that is...) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() Drives: '03 Monte Carlo SS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: VaBeach VA
Posts: 348
|
the LS9 and LSA are similar but the LSA is less expensive to produce. Both the LSA and LS9 are basically blown LS3s.
However, the LS9 is the "flagship" engine with titanium and forged components. It has a 2.3L S/C with a 2 piece intercooler. The LS9 is also a dry sump oiler like the LS7 the LSA uses standard cast and aluminum components has a 1.9L S/C with an integrated single piece intercooler. It stays closer to stock with a wet sump oil system. It also has a lower compression ratio than the LS9. (probably due to the cast aluminum parts) http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...ual/09lsa.html LSA Intercooler http://gm.wieck.com/forms/gm/previewpage?043892 http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...ual/09ls9.html LS9 Intercooler http://gm.wieck.com/forms/gm/previewpage?043512 http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/au...illacctsv.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Moderator.ca
|
Quote:
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|