Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Technical Camaro Topics > Suspension / Brakes / Chassis


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-25-2014, 10:39 AM   #15
TLSTWIN
Romans10:9-13
 
TLSTWIN's Avatar
 
Drives: /\yes, this is me/\
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Vermilion, Ohio
Posts: 4,435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin Moreno View Post
I believe 660mm was what pedders recommended for their suspension. I'm not sure if that was for damper travel or suspension geometry. Different shocks/struts have different optimal heights, which comes from the internal design of the damper, as well as OAL and total damper travel. based on pfadts recommendation in the installation manual for them, the pfadts can go low enough to where your concern should be axle angle, and suspension geometry, not as much damper travel.
Axle geometry, pedders could go much lower also
__________________
TLSTWIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 10:43 AM   #16
JusticePete
 
JusticePete's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro Justice
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 20,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by KRich2587 View Post
how about on 19s or 18s?
1" = 25mm
19" 12.5mm shorter ADD 12.5 mm to the measurement 672.5mm
18" 25mm shorter ADD 25mm 685mm

Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin Moreno View Post
Pfadt recommended 29-29.25" from the ground to the fender with 28.7" OD tires. Yours are 27.9" so they would say 28.6-28.85" for you. I would stay on the high side of that for shock travel especially in the rear
Measuring from the ground to the fender introduces tire aspect ratio, inflation and tread wear into the measurement. Measuring from a fixed point on the rim eliminates all three.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin Moreno View Post
I believe 660mm was what pedders recommended for their suspension. I'm not sure if that was for damper travel or suspension geometry. Different shocks/struts have different optimal heights, which comes from the internal design of the damper, as well as OAL and total damper travel. based on pfadts recommendation in the installation manual for them, the pfadts can go low enough to where your concern should be axle angle, and suspension geometry, not as much damper travel.

That said, there are many people running at 650mm with no axle issues.
If you road course or drive very fast in a straight line the shaft angle increase with lowered ride heights increase the operating temperature of the CV joints. High quality synthetic lube is more resistant to liquifying under these high heat loads. Shaft angle is a concern.

At ride heights below 660, the rear suspension upper arm binds. There isn't enough upward travel. Driven Danny Popp hard, 675mm in the rear.
JusticePete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 10:48 AM   #17
CHMSC
ROAD COURSE JUNKIE
 
CHMSC's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 4,868
One of the most challenging parts to setting ride height is finding a surface that is truly level. If you can find a good level surface that is ideal for setting ride height. If this is a track only car I would recommend not screwing with the settings to much and just take it to get corner balanced and tell them the ride height range you would like to be at and let them deal with it.
__________________
CHMSC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 10:54 AM   #18
JusticePete
 
JusticePete's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro Justice
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 20,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by CHMSC View Post
One of the most challenging parts to setting ride height is finding a surface that is truly level. If you can find a good level surface that is ideal for setting ride height. If this is a track only car I would recommend not screwing with the settings to much and just take it to get corner balanced and tell them the ride height range you would like to be at and let them deal with it.
An alignment rack works well.

There is minimal adjustment required when corner weighting a 1LE. They did a great job at the factory.



Long story short, you'll be very close with the ride heights discussed.
JusticePete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 11:00 AM   #19
dvanderk
 
Drives: 2011 2SS Camaro
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLSTWIN View Post
yep

I am at 660 on all 4 corners
Thanks for the info on that, I was curious about the recommended metrics for that.
dvanderk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 11:19 AM   #20
CHMSC
ROAD COURSE JUNKIE
 
CHMSC's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 4,868
Quote:
Originally Posted by JusticePete View Post
An alignment rack works well.

There is minimal adjustment required when corner weighting a 1LE. They did a great job at the factory.



Long story short, you'll be very close with the ride heights discussed.

I set my ride height at the aligment guys shop, like you said.

Pete, how is the corner weight of and SS? I know you have done 1 or 2 of those.
__________________
CHMSC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 11:24 AM   #21
JusticePete
 
JusticePete's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro Justice
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 20,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by CHMSC View Post
I set my ride height at the alignment guys shop, like you said.

Pete, how is the corner weight of and SS? I know you have done 1 or 2 of those.
Within 15 pounds a corner. The 5th Gen is a great car from the factory.
JusticePete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 11:45 AM   #22
CHMSC
ROAD COURSE JUNKIE
 
CHMSC's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 4,868
Quote:
Originally Posted by JusticePete View Post
Within 15 pounds a corner. The 5th Gen is a great car from the factory.

cool Pete
__________________
CHMSC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 12:21 PM   #23
Moreno1
 
Drives: G5.R
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by JusticePete View Post
At ride heights below 660, the rear suspension upper arm binds. There isn't enough upward travel. Driven Danny Popp hard, 675mm in the rear.
I wouldn't doubt that. upper arm travel was something we had to consider while fabricating the tubular rear cradle.

Raising the car to 675mm is surprising though. Makes me wonder what the ride height is on the grand am cars. As I understand it, they are not allowed to modify suspension arms, and they seem pretty low from the pictures I have seen.
Moreno1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 01:19 PM   #24
TLSTWIN
Romans10:9-13
 
TLSTWIN's Avatar
 
Drives: /\yes, this is me/\
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Vermilion, Ohio
Posts: 4,435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin Moreno View Post
I wouldn't doubt that. upper arm travel was something we had to consider while fabricating the tubular rear cradle.

Raising the car to 675mm is surprising though. Makes me wonder what the ride height is on the grand am cars. As I understand it, they are not allowed to modify suspension arms, and they seem pretty low from the pictures I have seen.
Not to mention they are already running 18" wheels, so they are already at a lower cg
__________________
TLSTWIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 01:31 PM   #25
JusticePete
 
JusticePete's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro Justice
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 20,174




The Z/28 is wearing OE fender skirts.

JusticePete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 03:24 PM   #26
Moreno1
 
Drives: G5.R
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by JusticePete View Post
1" = 25mm
19" 12.5mm shorter ADD 12.5 mm to the measurement 672.5mm
18" 25mm shorter ADD 25mm 685mm
Why add? should be shorter distance from fender to wheel lip if you go down in wheel size.

These are the pics I am referring to. Granted they have the flares, but still, looks pretty low. this is on 25.5" tires and 18" wheels.



Moreno1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 03:25 PM   #27
VR Baron
SoCal Camaro5 Race Team
 
VR Baron's Avatar
 
Drives: 2021 Shadow Grey Camaro 2SS 1LE
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SO CAL
Posts: 14,298
Quote:
Originally Posted by JusticePete View Post
An alignment rack works well.

There is minimal adjustment required when corner weighting a 1LE. They did a great job at the factory.



Long story short, you'll be very close with the ride heights discussed.
Pete, so with 660mm allaround, is that also the best for the corner balance for the SS as well? Or does it matter as it isnt as close as the 1le? And does corner balancing do anything for auto x?
VR Baron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 03:37 PM   #28
JusticePete
 
JusticePete's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro Justice
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 20,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin Moreno View Post
Why add? should be shorter distance from fender to wheel lip if you go down in wheel size.

These are the pics I am referring to. Granted they have the flares, but still, looks pretty low. this is on 25.5" tires and 18" wheels.



My ride heights are based on 20" so to adjust them for use on a smaller wheel you add.

If you tuck the rear wheels with a ride height lower than 660 the upper arm will bind and the car will become unsettled crossing gator backs.
JusticePete is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.