Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-10-2015, 03:37 AM   #15
Bodywerks

 
Drives: 2015 2SS/RS/1LE
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Tucson
Posts: 866
Same here. Would love to see more evidence of power gains like 1sick_eg.
__________________
2015 SS/RS/1LE
HSA delete, VMAX throttle body, CAI inc. Intake, PRC255 heads, BTR 660 springs, BTR cryo-treated rockers, PAT G 232/240 .654/.626 110+2, johnson 2110's, Manton 502 pushrods, C5R, Melling high volume/high pressure, Powerbond 25% underdrive pulley, Proform covers, Kooks stepped headers, catless mids, Doug Thorley exhaust. 512rwhp, 446rwtq on a mustang dyno, tuned by Cunningham motorsports.
Bodywerks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 07:17 AM   #16
Rhino79


 
Rhino79's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS L99/Auto
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 2,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by DietCoke View Post
Seems overkill for a heavy car with the fru fru body kit. Hey, if the owner's happy

Sounds good
I think a 429, in a 3200 lb Camaro to run mid 10s overkill too since I went faster with a stock 376 with cam and heads!!

Customers car already ran 11.4s. Circle d 5c, prc255, 3.91 etc
Rhino79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 08:08 AM   #17
Rhino79


 
Rhino79's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS L99/Auto
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 2,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast6.3 View Post
hey Ryan for a daily driver is it really worth the extra money to run solid versus hydraulic
whats more reliable also
The solids will have unmatched durability. These low lash cams aren't going to need to be readjusted hardly at all either.

But, with increased lift, you will shorten valve spring life. I personally think changing the springs annually would be a good investment.

THe Solids, just don't lay over up top like the hydraulics, and to run the solids, you have to purchase bullet proof valvetrain.

For the serious enthusiast that wants the most out of the setup, the solid will out perform the hydraulic.

And Ill be able to tell you by how much in just a little bit. The only change to this customers car is the cam.

This car will shift at about 7200-7300 rpm.
Rhino79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 08:10 AM   #18
Rhino79


 
Rhino79's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS L99/Auto
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 2,827
For a daily that wont get raced at all, no its not worth the investment in my honest opinion. If you frequent the track, or are more of a hardcore guy, the solid is the way to go.
Rhino79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 08:55 AM   #19
Unreal


 
Drives: 2006 Z06
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 5,712
One thing with these solids, the factory ls3 intake manifold isn't design for the high RPM power, so I don't think they can really shine without an aftermarket intake focused on high RPM power. They do work great, but a new intake would really wake them up.
__________________
Nick
Corvette Z06 -1200ish rwhp
Unreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 09:10 AM   #20
Rhino79


 
Rhino79's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS L99/Auto
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 2,827
I agree. But even with stock intake mine carries out to 7600
Rhino79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 10:22 AM   #21
PBANDPKSCAMARO
Will stay stock :(
 
Drives: 2010 2SS
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40
Be nice to know what the installed price for this kit is to compare with the other VVT and LS3 conversions out there.
__________________
Hers: 2010 2SS, RS, A6, Sunroof, Catback Exhaust and it will stay this way!
PBANDPKSCAMARO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 11:23 AM   #22
Bodywerks

 
Drives: 2015 2SS/RS/1LE
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Tucson
Posts: 866
Basically, take a regular cam install price, and add about $2,000. That's $350 for lifters, $400 for valve covers-you can save a few hundred with just spacers, and the big kicker is about $1200 for a set of adjustable rockers.
Now, IMO, if you are already planning on aftermarket rockers and lifters, you might as well just go LLSR. If I start seeing more big hp improvements with this setup, I may just have to take the plunge. Right now, the extra $2k isn't justifiable if it's not worth 40-50 more hp.
__________________
2015 SS/RS/1LE
HSA delete, VMAX throttle body, CAI inc. Intake, PRC255 heads, BTR 660 springs, BTR cryo-treated rockers, PAT G 232/240 .654/.626 110+2, johnson 2110's, Manton 502 pushrods, C5R, Melling high volume/high pressure, Powerbond 25% underdrive pulley, Proform covers, Kooks stepped headers, catless mids, Doug Thorley exhaust. 512rwhp, 446rwtq on a mustang dyno, tuned by Cunningham motorsports.
Bodywerks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 11:30 AM   #23
Unreal


 
Drives: 2006 Z06
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 5,712
Do ls3 heads have to be machined for the rockers like ls7 heads? If so that is $300-500.

Plus install prices are going to be higher if you are paying a shop, as there is a lot more to the install. I would add 3-4 hours of shop time to a install price to adjust lash, setup rockers, etc.
__________________
Nick
Corvette Z06 -1200ish rwhp
Unreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 11:35 AM   #24
PBANDPKSCAMARO
Will stay stock :(
 
Drives: 2010 2SS
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bodywerks View Post
Basically, take a regular cam install price, and add about $2,000. That's $350 for lifters, $400 for valve covers-you can save a few hundred with just spacers, and the big kicker is about $1200 for a set of adjustable rockers.
Now, IMO, if you are already planning on aftermarket rockers and lifters, you might as well just go LLSR. If I start seeing more big hp improvements with this setup, I may just have to take the plunge. Right now, the extra $2k isn't justifiable if it's not worth 40-50 more hp.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unreal View Post
Do ls3 heads have to be machined for the rockers like ls7 heads? If so that is $300-500.

Plus install prices are going to be higher if you are paying a shop, as there is a lot more to the install. I would add 3-4 hours of shop time to a install price to adjust lash, setup rockers, etc.
So like around $6000 total factoring all this in?
__________________
Hers: 2010 2SS, RS, A6, Sunroof, Catback Exhaust and it will stay this way!
PBANDPKSCAMARO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 11:55 AM   #25
Bodywerks

 
Drives: 2015 2SS/RS/1LE
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Tucson
Posts: 866
Ls3 heads don't have to be machined for the rockers.
I priced out an LLSR setup. I was going to just port my current heads:
Btr 660 springs $300
Morel 4737 lifters $395
Cam 236/246 .63x/.62x 114lsa+3 $450
Jesel rockers $1100
Frh porting $1100
Pushrods $250
Melling 10296 pump $150
Katech chain $150
Proform covers n coil relocate $320
Ls2 damper $20
Firecore50 wires $125
Arp bolts $125
You still have to add gaskets and, like 3 bolt cam gear etc, so another few hundo...
__________________
2015 SS/RS/1LE
HSA delete, VMAX throttle body, CAI inc. Intake, PRC255 heads, BTR 660 springs, BTR cryo-treated rockers, PAT G 232/240 .654/.626 110+2, johnson 2110's, Manton 502 pushrods, C5R, Melling high volume/high pressure, Powerbond 25% underdrive pulley, Proform covers, Kooks stepped headers, catless mids, Doug Thorley exhaust. 512rwhp, 446rwtq on a mustang dyno, tuned by Cunningham motorsports.
Bodywerks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 11:59 AM   #26
Unreal


 
Drives: 2006 Z06
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 5,712
Get some quotes. Like GPI said, I don't think it is worth it for a normal daily car. $2000+ for a bit more top end, but if it is a max effort build, or a money is no issue build, go for it. If your goal is to go fast though, there are much better ways to spend the money.
__________________
Nick
Corvette Z06 -1200ish rwhp
Unreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 12:08 PM   #27
DietCoke
Slow Turtle
 
DietCoke's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 1SS
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Manhattan, KS
Posts: 1,123
Send a message via AIM to DietCoke
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhino79 View Post
I think a 429, in a 3200 lb Camaro to run mid 10s overkill too since I went faster with a stock 376 with cam and heads!!

Customers car already ran 11.4s. Circle d 5c, prc255, 3.91 etc
It went 9.x before I got rid of it. The guy who bought it swapped in a glide. Last I heard it runs mid 9s now.
DietCoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 12:13 PM   #28
Pro Stock John
Writer
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,221
He should start a new thread on the car, would be interesting to see what changes he made.

As for this thread, the owner of the car is a local friend who got the drag racing bug and has been stepping up his combo. He's one of the guys I race with on a regular basis. I can't wait to hear this combo in person.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II
13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock
12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune
12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune
11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts
10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800
Pro Stock John is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.