|
View Poll Results: What brand catch can do you want brandX to be? | |||
Apex | 6 | 11.11% | |
Elite engineering | 34 | 62.96% | |
RX performance | 11 | 20.37% | |
Mishimoto | 2 | 3.70% | |
Cusco | 1 | 1.85% | |
Voters: 54. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
07-14-2015, 09:34 PM | #15 | |
211 v6 m6
Drives: 2011 v6 manual white with black Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Detroit
Posts: 89
|
Quote:
|
|
07-14-2015, 09:37 PM | #16 |
211 v6 m6
Drives: 2011 v6 manual white with black Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Detroit
Posts: 89
|
This is how the setup currently is. You will notice up front the moroso can followed by the brandX to the right.
|
07-14-2015, 10:37 PM | #17 | ||
Drives: ‘13 1LE Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,904
|
Quote:
All kinds of warranty claims and TSB reports, at dealerships these days, Audi, etc you name it, with intake tract gunk issues at those mileage intervals. Quote:
From engineering, design to marketing let's not forget profit aka accounting, to legalities, to lawyers.. What were PCV, etc systems designed for??? That's right, not performance, but emissions. Recirculating everything back into the intake tract is not rocket science, but it sure is a logical approach(or is it?) to keeping the greens happy, end of story. This method usually suffices for the first owner lease . Consequent 2nd owner will elect for the "dealer intake clean job" which is huge profit $$$ , speaking of who makes the cash as well here . Sure catch cans are over priced to some degree, but I don't blame "the catch can". Blame the rediculous mark-up $$$ due to our Plutocracy and stagnated wages causing contrast. |
||
07-14-2015, 10:43 PM | #18 |
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2Ss M6 Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Southern California
Posts: 4,013
|
An RX Catch i take it?
|
07-14-2015, 10:54 PM | #19 |
211 v6 m6
Drives: 2011 v6 manual white with black Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Detroit
Posts: 89
|
Lol your absolutely right Camaro dude. Let's not get to far off topic but hey look at the cost of an led, could get 10 for a penny. But you buy a Phillips led bulb for $20 for your lamp at home to save money... Are you really saving. Haha
Nighthawk89 the brandX catch will be disclosed sooner than later. Like I memtioned I'm running some personal and requested tests. The supplier was kind of upset about location of brandX due to the hear emitting from side of motor and the headers directly below the catch. However the brand x still caught more than the leading competition, who's can is in a cooler location. Most of you may know that catch can extract more in lower temps. More images and supporting data to come. |
07-15-2015, 04:55 AM | #20 | ||
having FUN now 13.66@101
|
Quote:
Quote:
Keep in mind folks, a Direct Injected engine has no fuel passing thru the intake manifold or over the valves to help keep them clean. All the buildup of oil found in the intake and on the valves is from the oil vapor returning back into the engine to be burned again. Mandated by the government for emissions. One of the reason you won't see a catch can on these from the factory, is it requires to be maintained like everything else, emptying the can. Hard to get people to change the oil let alone empty a catch can. Also, the government requires a sealed closed system, from the factory. There is plenty of information all over the internet on this subject. My current catch can (RX, one of the first ones to market) catches approximately 1 ounce of oil per 1000 miles. I now have 76K miles on my Camaro. Imagine the build-up of GUNK with 76 ounces of CRAP inside the manifold and on the valves. NO-THANK-YOU. So call it snake oil if you want. No problem for me. However, I can guarantee I will have a catch can on every one of my future DI engines from day one.
__________________
|
||
07-15-2015, 04:57 AM | #21 | |
having FUN now 13.66@101
|
Quote:
If driven hard (high RPM's) or in the winter (condensation) more oil will built up (fill up) faster, requiring more frequent emptying.
__________________
|
|
07-15-2015, 07:44 AM | #22 |
|
Pretty cool! I wish some C5 vendors would let me test their products for them! (I'M TALKING TO YOU, AGP...)
While reading I thought I was smart and figured "Brand X" was Apex. But looking at your picture makes me think RX. I'm more interested in guessing who the company is than in anything else. Ignore the naysayers. $150 for an Apex Catch can (For me) to give me some piece of mind?!?! I didn't even think twice about it. And after ~9 months, I couldn't be happier with my purchase. I've spent a lot more money on a lot less!! Go find something else to whine about.
__________________
Taco's 2014 SS
Mods: 417 Stroker | CAI | Bo's PTB | Kooks LTs | Flowmaster Outlaw Catback | Night Fury Cam | Powerbond UDP | Apex Catch Can |PRC Ported Heads |FAST 102 Intake |Suspension Crap| Built by J-Rod. |
07-15-2015, 08:58 AM | #23 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2015 LFX Auto Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US of A
Posts: 280
|
I would like to see this test done against the Mighty Mouse next if your doing multiple cans! Can't get anyone to show the internals of it, and this will be great if done with different brands to see how all of them actually function. Taco, he states the BrandX is a supporting vendor here...so can't be RX. Apex's is pretty new, I am leaning toward Elite Engineering as they are always working to improve. Time will tell, but I want to see the results more than anything. And rtCat is correct, port injection engines do not have the coking due to the fuel constantly spraying on the valves. We tear them down and see zero deposits at 150-200k miles, but do see the piston rings stuck in the groves due to the residue/varnish from the same oil ingestion and any tuner can tell you the detonation caused by the oil contaminating the A/F mixture by the knock retard. No engine does well ingestion crankcase oil.
Props to the OP for doing this! I want to see Mighty Mouse, Mike Norris, Phastek, etc. ALL done this way so we can all see once and for all just how effective each can is, and I can tell you as a GM tech, ALL DI engines need ALL the oil stopped, just not some of it. |
07-15-2015, 09:29 AM | #24 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Taco's 2014 SS
Mods: 417 Stroker | CAI | Bo's PTB | Kooks LTs | Flowmaster Outlaw Catback | Night Fury Cam | Powerbond UDP | Apex Catch Can |PRC Ported Heads |FAST 102 Intake |Suspension Crap| Built by J-Rod. |
|
07-15-2015, 10:51 AM | #25 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2015 LFX Auto Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US of A
Posts: 280
|
Quote:
And this is ALL auto makers. Do a Google search and find hundreds of pictures from other techs from every car maker you could imagine: https://www.google.com/search?q=inta...5khuU1WpszM%3A And these same engines are showing valve guides worn to excessive tolerances in 20-30k miles as well from these deposits being pulled into the guides every cycle of the valve. Lots of benefits from DI, but this side effect is serious. |
|
07-15-2015, 01:04 PM | #26 |
Drives: 14 1LE Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 1,567
|
Black and White,
What did the inside of your intake manifold look like? Seems to me that your deposits look like oil from the valve guides rather than from the intake track.
__________________
LMS Engineering
|
07-15-2015, 01:26 PM | #27 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2015 LFX Auto Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US of A
Posts: 280
|
Quote:
Find a LLT car near you, takes 5 minutes to pull the plenum cover off and see yourself, and 10 minutes to pull the intake manifold itself so you can see clearly into the intake ports. Hope he post pics of what his looked like. |
|
07-15-2015, 02:08 PM | #28 |
211 v6 m6
Drives: 2011 v6 manual white with black Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Detroit
Posts: 89
|
Wiping out intake point prior to removal
|
|
|
|
|