Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Vararam
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > V8 and V6 Transmissions / Driveline (6L80 / 6L50 / TR6060 / AY6)


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-13-2019, 06:24 PM   #15
Black_SS10
SomeguyK
 
Black_SS10's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 1,947
I never noticed that big of a difference between the stock and aluminum shaft. The only thing I did notice was more noise, thats about it. I am currently using the factory shaft again. The DSS diff side spacer had a couple bolt holes strip on me.
__________________
TMS 427, Dart iron Block, Forged assembly, Frankenstien heads, AGP TT 62/62 BB turbo's, AGP/Fore triple fuel system, Tilton clutch, Holley 1 7/8 shorties, Technostalgia tail lights,Oracle, Aeroforce, MGW shifter,Flowmaster, Pegasus subframe bushings,BMR trailing & toe arms,Z28 UCA bushings,Zl1 rear sway bar,Prothane,BMR,Goodridge brake lines,Ridetech HQ coilovers,3.91,Trutrac,billet caps,DSS axles,HE offest,built TR6060,1LE diffuser,Havoc spoiler,SSclones,20in MRR 017, Pirelli P Zero, Nitto NT555RII

More to come.
Black_SS10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2019, 06:40 PM   #16
SquawkVFR
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black_SS10 View Post
I never noticed that big of a difference between the stock and aluminum shaft. The only thing I did notice was more noise, thats about it. I am currently using the factory shaft again. The DSS diff side spacer had a couple bolt holes strip on me.
Do you mind sharing the details? Brand, installation...etc...
SquawkVFR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2019, 08:11 PM   #17
NEstyle
 
Drives: Caprice
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: SE PA
Posts: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtstorey View Post
Think of a bicycle with you pedaling it (engine). If you go from heavy steel wheels to light weight carbon fiber wheels, you will accelerate faster (especially since it's rotating weight), but you as the engine will be the same (produce the same power).
I don't know how much quicker the aluminum driveshaft will make the car, but it will be quicker at the same power.

Well of course, but if a car can accelerate faster with an AL driveshaft, that means that more power is getting to the ground. On a dyno, that means that more power is getting to the roller which accelerates the roller faster which results in more measured power. Remember that a dyno measures power at the rear wheel after all of the losses. I am not talking about an engine dyno which is what your example is equivalent to.
NEstyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2019, 09:31 PM   #18
Black_SS10
SomeguyK
 
Black_SS10's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 1,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by SquawkVFR View Post
Do you mind sharing the details? Brand, installation...etc...
It's a DSS aluminum one. I installed it, as with everything else for my car. It really didn't change the feel of the car, just added noise. If you're wondering about the spacer. The DSS shaft comes with two aluminum spacers that go on each end. Some of the holes on the diff side spacer stripped out and others I had to cut the bolts in order to remove the shaft.
__________________
TMS 427, Dart iron Block, Forged assembly, Frankenstien heads, AGP TT 62/62 BB turbo's, AGP/Fore triple fuel system, Tilton clutch, Holley 1 7/8 shorties, Technostalgia tail lights,Oracle, Aeroforce, MGW shifter,Flowmaster, Pegasus subframe bushings,BMR trailing & toe arms,Z28 UCA bushings,Zl1 rear sway bar,Prothane,BMR,Goodridge brake lines,Ridetech HQ coilovers,3.91,Trutrac,billet caps,DSS axles,HE offest,built TR6060,1LE diffuser,Havoc spoiler,SSclones,20in MRR 017, Pirelli P Zero, Nitto NT555RII

More to come.

Last edited by Black_SS10; 11-13-2019 at 10:04 PM.
Black_SS10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2019, 09:59 PM   #19
John_C
LSx FTW!!!
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS RS
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: TN
Posts: 781
My aluminum DSS shaft has more NVH, especially on deceleration.

I have a Tim King at TK Performance 1,000hp built CTSV 6L90, Circle D billet triple disc 3200-3400 stall and stock (for now) SS rear diff and axles.

Fwiw... Car made 723 rwhp 93 pump and 760 rwhp on E85.
John_C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2019, 09:06 AM   #20
gtstorey


 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS2,L99, LSA SC
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 2,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by NEstyle View Post
Well of course, but if a car can accelerate faster with an AL driveshaft, that means that more power is getting to the ground. On a dyno, that means that more power is getting to the roller which accelerates the roller faster which results in more measured power. Remember that a dyno measures power at the rear wheel after all of the losses. I am not talking about an engine dyno which is what your example is equivalent to.
I'm not sure that a dyno is sophisticated enough to pick up on that. The weight of the rotating mass isn't necessarily a " loss" from my quick read of how at least some dynos actually work since they use both the accel and decel time to calculate power. It would be interesting to see the math that is used for calculations to see how time/acceleration is factored into it.
gtstorey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2019, 09:27 AM   #21
go_go_gadget88
 
go_go_gadget88's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS ABM 6M
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Kansas
Posts: 617
Most lighter drivetrain component swaps don't seem to effect dyno numbers much whatsoever from what I have seen, unless they involve reducing friction (where you lose power between the engine and the tires). So things like ceramic bearings and micropolishing gears I can see making minor changes in power readout. Things like a lighter driveshaft or throwing on a set of welds on it, less so. You aren't creating any more power, or freeing up any lost. You are just reducing weight, and thus creating less work for your horsepower to do, resulting in quicker acceleration (in theory). I don't see a lot of back to back 1/4 mile runs after a driveshaft swap so unsure of actual results.

Same can be said if I would lose the ~50lbs I want to. My car would be quicker, albeit by a small amount, but I would not expect it to dyno any differently. I'm with gtstorey though, I think it would be interesting to see the math the dyno uses for calculations
__________________
2010 ABM 2SS/RS LS3 6 Speed -- Rotofab CAI | Speed Engineering 1 7/8" Longtubes w/ cat Delete | Magnaflow competition catback | TSP 231/246 cam| TSP/PAC .660" Spring Kit | TSP CNC Ported Heads | Bo White PTB | GPI Ported/RM Intake | 3.91's | BC Catch Can | MGW Shifter | BMR 1" Drop Springs | BMR Trailing arms/Toe Rods/Rear UCA Bushings | Pegasus Subframe Mounts
go_go_gadget88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2019, 09:51 AM   #22
SquawkVFR
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black_SS10 View Post
It's a DSS aluminum one. I installed it, as with everything else for my car. It really didn't change the feel of the car, just added noise. If you're wondering about the spacer. The DSS shaft comes with two aluminum spacers that go on each end. Some of the holes on the diff side spacer stripped out and others I had to cut the bolts in order to remove the shaft.
I’m not attacking your skills but could that be the difference? Mine was professionally installed and balanced?
SquawkVFR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2019, 10:00 AM   #23
gtstorey


 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS2,L99, LSA SC
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 2,451
The only thing I would add to go_go_gadget88 is that the loss of rotating weight is more important to acceleration than static weight so if you could loose 50 lbs from the rotating weight, your times would change a lot more than 50 lbs of static weight.
gtstorey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2019, 11:44 AM   #24
Black_SS10
SomeguyK
 
Black_SS10's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: FL
Posts: 1,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by SquawkVFR View Post
I’m not attacking your skills but could that be the difference? Mine was professionally installed and balanced?
All good. It comes from DSS already balanced. They mark it, mine was with yellow paint. It isn't hard to install. The instructions are clear and it is just some bolts. I measured the CV joint clearance and used a new torque wrench on the bolts. I know "pros" that can mess up an oil change. So I do 95% of my own work.
__________________
TMS 427, Dart iron Block, Forged assembly, Frankenstien heads, AGP TT 62/62 BB turbo's, AGP/Fore triple fuel system, Tilton clutch, Holley 1 7/8 shorties, Technostalgia tail lights,Oracle, Aeroforce, MGW shifter,Flowmaster, Pegasus subframe bushings,BMR trailing & toe arms,Z28 UCA bushings,Zl1 rear sway bar,Prothane,BMR,Goodridge brake lines,Ridetech HQ coilovers,3.91,Trutrac,billet caps,DSS axles,HE offest,built TR6060,1LE diffuser,Havoc spoiler,SSclones,20in MRR 017, Pirelli P Zero, Nitto NT555RII

More to come.
Black_SS10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2019, 12:02 PM   #25
NEstyle
 
Drives: Caprice
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: SE PA
Posts: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtstorey View Post
The only thing I would add to go_go_gadget88 is that the loss of rotating weight is more important to acceleration than static weight so if you could loose 50 lbs from the rotating weight, your times would change a lot more than 50 lbs of static weight.
Yes, exactly. That is what I'm saying.
NEstyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2019, 05:20 PM   #26
go_go_gadget88
 
go_go_gadget88's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS ABM 6M
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Kansas
Posts: 617
Quote:
Originally Posted by NEstyle View Post
Yes, exactly. That is what I'm saying.
So you're saying thowing on a set of welds on would increase the dyno number, since it is freeing up rotating mass?

I would have to see this to believe it
__________________
2010 ABM 2SS/RS LS3 6 Speed -- Rotofab CAI | Speed Engineering 1 7/8" Longtubes w/ cat Delete | Magnaflow competition catback | TSP 231/246 cam| TSP/PAC .660" Spring Kit | TSP CNC Ported Heads | Bo White PTB | GPI Ported/RM Intake | 3.91's | BC Catch Can | MGW Shifter | BMR 1" Drop Springs | BMR Trailing arms/Toe Rods/Rear UCA Bushings | Pegasus Subframe Mounts
go_go_gadget88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2019, 07:33 PM   #27
hammdo
'It's an experiment'
 
hammdo's Avatar
 
Drives: [COTW 2/09/15] '11 GPI LSA SC Z/LE
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 8,709
Quote:
Originally Posted by NEstyle View Post
I would love to see some before and after dyno results from a quick driveshaft swap.
I did just that with GPI, no hp or torque gain but, Got there quicker and all we noticed was how ‘smooth, quiet, and vib free’ it rolled on. I have the CF driveshaft. My suspension is a solid as one can get...


-Don
__________________
747 RWHP 794 RWTQ
"Horsepower sells cars, torque wins races." - Enzo Ferrari
See My Build: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=385577
hammdo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2019, 07:47 PM   #28
SquawkVFR
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammdo View Post
I did just that with GPI, no hp or torque gain but, Got there quicker and all we noticed was how ‘smooth, quiet, and vib free’ it rolled on. I have the CF driveshaft. My suspension is a solid as one can get...


-Don
The proofs in the puddin’.
SquawkVFR is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.