![]() |
|
|
#15 |
![]() Drives: 2013 ls Camaro Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro 2LT/RS Join Date: May 2015
Location: Farmville, Virginia
Posts: 1,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Give speed a chance
Drives: 2015 Camaro 2LS, 2015 Camaro Z/28 Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Mesa, Az
Posts: 2,805
|
Pretty difficult to get an unbiased opinion on this subject. My guess is you'll vote for what you own 95% of the time. Always the exception for "I got such a good deal, couldn't pass it up". Having said that I give a slight edge to '14-'15. I liked the entire "refresh" style the minute I saw it.
__________________
2LS: a TREMENDOUS machine. Z/28: it's a BIT MORE POWERFUL, of course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 Victory Red LFX Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: west central Texas
Posts: 1,371
|
My first car was a '74 Dart Sport so I'm kinda partial to four.
__________________
'18 SS wheels, colored matched Heritage grille, actual driving lights, ZL1 strut tower brace, GM Performance billet aluminum fuel door, victory red rotors and calipers, 1/4 window American flags, splash guards, AEM dry panel air filter, Hot Wheels steering wheel and seat covers, Hot Wheels exterior emblems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Tri-County Camaro SWFL
|
I dont think the tail lights make the car. For me it has to do with the rear diffuser. 10-13 looks better. The 14/15 have that huge plastic diffuser that takes up half the bumper. BUT...... you paint the 14/15 diffuser or get a Z/28 or spring edition...... then its pretty nice.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() |
I'm split. I like the more modern look of the '14-15 RS LED tail lights and the Hero versions as well.
But the more old school look of the '10-13 fits a bit better. I tried to blend both by converting mine to high-power LEDs. Old school look with the brightness and response of LEDs. Original on the left.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() Drives: 2013 Camaro LFX 2LT Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Sunny Mexico
Posts: 64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
![]() Drives: 2013 ls Camaro Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 350
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 15 Camaro SS Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Mountains of central PA
Posts: 1,442
|
Quote:
__________________
15 Camaro SS- GPI max top end, ESS Vortech V3 9psi, ID 1050s, ZL1 pump, JMS bap, Long tubes, Corsa extreme, Circle D pro 5C, 391 rear, DSS carbon drive shaft, poly cradle bushings, tuned by Ted Jannetty and much much more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Started#gottalovethatblue
|
I'm more partial to the '10-'13 than the '14+. I think the '10-'13 car captures a 1st gen look better than the refresh and as stated above, the non-Z/28 or spring edition have a matte plastic piece that goes way too high up the rear which makes the taillights look less desirable to me.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
![]() Drives: 2013 ls Camaro Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 350
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
![]() |
I definitely like the 10-13 more. I think the 14's are awkward. I like what they were trying to do, but it doesn't fit the car IMO.
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS
2018 Charger GT+ 2005 Cavailer LS S/C - Sold '87 HD FXRT - Wrecked pending repair |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro 1SS LS3 Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 4,018
|
I like them both about the same these days...
At first I didn't like the 14-15 tail lights too much. But they grew on me. Enough so to consider a rear end conversion one day. I Love the look SSEssence has on his ride with those upgrades too. No rush tho... because, again, still love my 10's set! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 CGM 2SS/RS LS3 Swapped A6 Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 4,737
|
This is a hard one.
When the refresh models came out I hated them and thought it looked awful. Now I think the rear end of the refresh Camaros look so damned clean and thicc - it gives it that super fat ass. It's just a very well thought out design. Maybe that's not the best way to describe it, but I think most of you understand what I saying. I also love my 2010 quad tail lights. It is more of a classic look and fits the earlier models perfectly as it compliments the 'retro' styling that GM was going after. I just wish we had some better aftermarket LED alternatives for the quads. I know there are some aftermarket models (and mods) that are available I and have seen them all, but I think they look rather subpar. I want them with the newer style of LEDs, similar to how it was implemented in the Hero lights for the refresh. So I am just rocking my quad tail lights with a very dark blackout film.
__________________
2010 CGM Camaro 2SS LS3 Swapped A6 - GPI LS3 SS1 .647/.638, (224/237, 112 +4, 7º overlap) on CamMotion 8620 core, BTR Platinum .660" Dual Spring kit w/titanium retainers, CHE bronze trunnion upgrade, stock heads milled @ .015, Melling HV 10296 oil pump, TSP 1-7/8" long tube headers (W/Catless Off-road Pipes), Corsa Xtreme 3" Catback, GPI Ported/Rod Mod Intake, Stage 2 Ported Throttle Body, Vararam OTR CAI, Mike Norris Gen 2 catch can + GM 1LE clean side separator, 160º thermostat - Megan Racing adjustable coilovers (lowered 1.75"), MRR M017 10/11" wheels-Tuned by Ryan @ GPI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|