![]() |
|
|
#15 | |
|
Red Brick of Vengeance!
Drives: 12 Second Brick Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
|
Quote:
As far as the "wrong" fuel being bad for your engine... You are wrong there too.. For example the Mustang GT is sold as being able to run on 87 octane yet the Spanish oak computer is adaptive enough to take advantage of higher octane gas automatically, yet no where is this stated in the owners manual... I think some thing similar could be going on along those lines with the 2010 V6 Camaro... Like I said, I can see the knock sensors pulling timing especially when running 87 octane... I believe Vince at Trifecta noticed the same thing... Also I don't have my manual in front of me but I bet it says a minimum of 87 is required... I'll have to check that when I get home..
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() |
I am putting in 87 octane and I am getting 26.1mpg on a short trip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
13.453 @ 101.90
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT Rally Yellow Join Date: May 2009
Location: SE Pa.
Posts: 1,877
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Swim Against the Flow
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT RS 6-speed Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11
|
I appreciate all the input. But obviously no clear consensus of opinion. The 89 octane is working out so I think I'll probably stick with that. I'm sure premium fuel is unneccessary......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
Quote:
We're not talking about the Mustang GT. Just like the Camaro SS, I am fully aware that it can be calibrated to either octane level with changes to performance. There is, however, a recommended fuel for both. Use the recommended fuel for optimum performance. On the Camaro V6 models, regular fuel is required. This differs from a recommended fuel because the the word "required" indicates that you don't have a choice. The computer will not calibrate for the different fuel conditions as well on the V6 as it will the V8. There are a variety of reasons for this, including the DI feature, the different tune, knock, heat, a different computer altogether, or something I have not listed. Regardless of the reason, GM had one for indicating a required fuel as opposed to a recommended fuel. You're welcome to use whatever you like. I'm sure if we drove 2 Camaro V6s in a lifelong test, yours with 93 and another with 87, the 87 would last longer. I don't have the funds to buy a Camaro for the sake of testing, but I'm sure any other V6 on the forum would suffice. The point of my post is not to argue with you but to advise Camaro5 members to use the right fuel so they can enjoy their Camaros as long as possible. GM does this to protect itself from warranty claims by incompetent buyers. If you break your car by doing something clearly against the acceptable use of the car, GM does not have to handle your claim under warranty. The acceptable use of a Camaro requires that it is maintained by the buyer at the buyer's expense according to the manual. This means using the fuel, oil, and other fluids delineated in the manual.
__________________
RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet//
Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN. warn 145:159 ban |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Thread Killer
|
Looks as if someone should read n heed his own sig, and quickly deleting your post and editing wasn't cool. [click last edit, then click compare versions.]
Last edited by 2ndgenz28; 01-18-2010 at 09:35 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Moderator
|
The post was edited for correctness. Your post has been reported. Read Camaro5's site rules, and please show respect on the forums.
__________________
RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet//
Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN. warn 145:159 ban |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() Drives: CGM 2LT/RS M6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Littleton, CO.
Posts: 195
|
Just wondering if the computer can sense the air density? Reason I ask is in Colorado the minimum octane is 85. Was told that at higher altitudes 85 equals 87 at lower altitude. I run both and can't tell much of a difference. Just really want to do what is best for my car. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Thread Killer
|
This is why I only posted that, debate will get no where fast without a real test. And such a test will be different for all as Icefsh post states.
As their are many many different blends of gas used in the US, as in Icefsh post above, location can change that, along with laws of the said area. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
I will also site this link to reiterate an earlier point. It states that the lowest available octane that is recommended by the manual is always the best for your engine. If you can't find it, please keep reading. Using a higher octane does not make your engine cleaner, faster, or better in any way. It makes your fuel more expensive and enhances the likelihood of knock. The only think you should knock is wood, so avoid putting higher octane than recommended or required in your engine.
__________________
RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet//
Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN. warn 145:159 ban |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
MJ STROH
|
Regular here in WY is 85 or 85.5 octane..but we are running at 4,000- 8,000 ft of elevation too. This lower octane works just fine...no knocks I do throw a bottle of injector cleaner in the tank about every other fill up though. If you guys ar so worried about octane get the lower octane and throw in a bottle of octane booster...you can get it at the dollars stores for a buck. I actually get worse mileage with the higher octane... because of less air..the higher octanes don't burn completely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
13.453 @ 101.90
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT Rally Yellow Join Date: May 2009
Location: SE Pa.
Posts: 1,877
|
I've been using mid-grade (89) since I got the car only because I fear the 87 octane posted may be actually less than 87.
The manual clearly states you can use 87 or higher under the Recommended Fuel heading. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Thread Killer
|
Quote:
Why they dropped the 86 here, once it got out to everyone that the 86 was just 87. Dunno if they do it all over but Sunoco for a long time had 86 87 89 94 here The 86 was always 1 penny cheaper. But came right out of the same 87 tank. It was a marketing ploy to get the cheap folks to buy more from them. Once word got out, Sunoco dropped the 86 from all local station. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Retired
Drives: 2010 Camaro RS V6 #1301 DOB 3/23/09 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ithaca NY
Posts: 2,563
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Anyone running something other than 87? | jeansonne627 | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 31 | 10-01-2009 03:40 PM |
| No 93 Octane in California | tribone | Mechanical Maintenance: Break-in / Oil & Fluids / Servicing | 15 | 08-27-2009 05:18 PM |
| What kind of gas are you filling up with in your '10 Camaro? | JewelZ | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 42 | 08-02-2009 10:31 AM |
| gas prices. | Congoman775 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 65 | 05-28-2008 01:20 PM |
| Trees in Your Tank? The Future of Green Gasoline: Earth Day Extra | Scotsman | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 7 | 04-23-2008 08:43 PM |