![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Not That sad..considering
Drives: Man Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: the part of washington the capital forgot about.
Posts: 3,747
|
but with thier lower MPG and lesser performance as well as the deficit they must overcome to sell 100k it isnt practical for them to think they'll sell that many.
__________________
Stop Whinging
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: . Join Date: May 2008
Location: .
Posts: 3,053
|
I saw the Challenger SRT8 for the first time in Vegas a few days ago. My friends were like "Oh look isn't that a Camaro?" and I was like "omg omg omg where?", turned out it was a Challenger :( I didn't like it as much as in the pictures tbh.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
FASTER!
Drives: Challenger Hellcat, 2SS Camaro Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 2,245
|
Good point
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Camaro Convert...
Drives: 2006 Cobalt SS Supercharged Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Metro Detroit, Mi
Posts: 595
|
The Camaro was created to compete with the Mustang in 1967. Thus the beginning of the "pony car" wars. Although of course any classic Mustang can be considered both a "pony car" and a "muscle car" but the Challenger was always considered more or a "muscle car".
Although I think the 5th Gen Camaro and born again Challenger will be more rivals in terms of what they offer compared to the Mustang.
__________________
![]() Currently Driving: 2006 Cobalt SS Supercharged |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: X-15 Velocipede Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 4,637
|
The Challenger is definitely direct competition. They weren't as popular (sales wise) in the early 70's as the Mustang and F body cars.
Let's face it, all these cars are cool, I want one of each. But, financially, I'll start with a Corvette or Camaro SS and go from there.
__________________
Go from the presence of a foolish man, when thou perceivest not in him the lips of knowledge
General Motors ASEP, A.S. Automotive Technology, Telecommunications Specialist, CISCO Network Engineer STANDARD DISCLAIMER camaro5 is furnishing this information "as is". camaro5 does not provide any warranty of the information whatsoever, whether express, implied, or statutory, including, but not limited to, any warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or any warranty that the contents of the information will be error-free. Last edited by camaro5; 09-30-2008 at 04:49 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
![]() Drives: Old Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: OK
Posts: 726
|
I see the Challenger and even the Nissan Z as relatively direct competition. I suppose volume and history make the Mustang a bit more of 'the direct competitor' but all of the cars will be competing for similiar buyers.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: LS3S/C Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: CALI
Posts: 1,344
|
two very important factors play in this competition A performance B price, the challenger wins on performance over the mustang but completely fails on price. the camaro has to be competitive in price with the mustang and competitive in performance with the challenger.
thus the camaro will have to be performace bargain if it wishes to dominate the muscle car market. however GM is going to push the V6 camaro as their top seller where it will have really no competition performance wise and if can manage to start at 22k it will dominate this market for sure. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Camaro6 2016-2018
Drives: sometimes Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 18,461
|
I think the challenger will flop.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Moderator
|
We flipped a coin. It landed on heads, and we established that heads (Ford) would be the primary enemy.
Obviously, the Challenger gets tails because its fat butt weights too much to get heads.
__________________
RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet//
Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN. warn 145:159 ban |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2006 Silverado SS, 2009 G8 GT Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: PNW
Posts: 13,313
|
I agree!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
killer bAnana
Drives: 1985 z28 Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Carson, CA
Posts: 694
|
hahaha ^^^
![]() new sig lookin good ![]()
__________________
"Shut your noise tube, Taco Human!" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: X-15 Velocipede Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 4,637
|
![]()
__________________
Go from the presence of a foolish man, when thou perceivest not in him the lips of knowledge
General Motors ASEP, A.S. Automotive Technology, Telecommunications Specialist, CISCO Network Engineer STANDARD DISCLAIMER camaro5 is furnishing this information "as is". camaro5 does not provide any warranty of the information whatsoever, whether express, implied, or statutory, including, but not limited to, any warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or any warranty that the contents of the information will be error-free. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
SOM WS6
Drives: 2002 SOM Trans Am WS6 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kinston, NC
Posts: 266
|
If the Camaro SS comes over 35k fully loaded alot of people will consider buying a used C6 Corvette and that will definatley hurt Camaro sales.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Challenger Priced | Design1stCode2nd | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 176 | 09-08-2008 07:33 PM |
Edmunds hangs with a Challenger SRT-8 for the weekend | Scotsman | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 11 | 04-21-2008 12:04 PM |
2009 Dodge Challenger Press Release (introducing model lineup) | Tran | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 8 | 03-20-2008 12:47 AM |
Challenger Pricing | LSxcellent | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 31 | 12-03-2007 09:00 PM |