![]() |
|
|
#15 |
|
Okie doke
|
LMAO at the GT500 Hp/TQ numbers ... " Ford's GT500 packs a supercharged 5.4-liter V8 engine with 305 horsepower and 208 pound feet of torque."
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Camaro & Stang Enthusiast
Drives: 2011 Mustang 5.0 in Kona Blue Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 4,729
|
Funny article. They must not be car people..lol..
__________________
Bought my Camaro from Eric Hall(817) 421-7266
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 cam.2ss/rs.iom,07'escalade esv Join Date: May 2009
Location: Pasc.Ms.
Posts: 841
|
nice!...although i believe they have the numbers wrong for the gt500....it is a happy day for more ride,i have had my maro one year today,does'nt seem like it,still an awesome ride,412hp/408trq.,to da ground,i may do a little more engine mod down the road,hav'nt quite decided yet...i will be 49 yrs.old the 29th of this month and it shows in the mornings when i get up,ha.but i have always been a camaro guy,
__________________
A9120159
1100:12/19/08 3800:06/19/09 6000:07/02/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I don't think anything beats the Camaro SS in hp/$.
The 2011 Mustang GT is the only thing that would be close.
__________________
Black 2SS ordered 1/4/2010, received 2/19/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() Drives: 1SS/RS Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Marietta, Ga.
Posts: 42
|
I think they were smoking something when they wrote the article. As much as it pains me to admit, the 2011 Shelby is rated at 550 hp. See below. I'll take my SS and the $18k price difference.
2011 Ford Shelby GT500 Select a trim below for more detailed vehicle information, including pictures, specs, and reviews. PictureTrim NameMSRPInvoiceEngineFuel Economy 550 HP15 / 23 mpg 550 HP15 / 23 mpg |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Rev Couture
Drives: 2010 LS Camaro & 2013 Rav4 Ltd Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jamlando, FL
Posts: 1,129
|
I respect this sources info and believe what they say to be true
- I mean they got the Camaro's numbers right, they must have also gotten the Mustang's also, right?
__________________
EBC Brakes| DOT 4|Bigworm| SickSpeed| BMR | IPF | Vararam| MRT |MGW | Nitto | Rx |
Iggee |ZL-1 Sways| Hurst | Apex Racing|Past: Srt-4| 6.0L GTO- RIP | '98 Integra |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() Drives: 2013 Camaro ZL1 Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: El Paso, Tx
Posts: 687
|
exept they got the GT500's numbers way off.
__________________
Devliered July 20, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
USER
Drives: 1SS, 1968 Camaro V8 396 Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Farmington, NM
Posts: 163
|
Even if they got the numbers wrong when you look at all the other cars on the list most are 5k-10k more but the Camaro SS still has the faster 0-60 time I say hey more bang for the buck and looks well nothing exept my 68 camaro looks as good
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
That Guy
Drives: really good Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 858
|
Ok. The gt500 numbers are from a 2010 gt?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() Drives: 2SS Camaro Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 439
|
They must be referring to the Ford GT500 Hybrid version :-)
I also noticed in the text of the article they refer to the 335's zero to 60 as 5.6s while in the list on the bottom of the page, they put 5.1s as a zero to 60. Yeah Forbes should stick to Financial News. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2011 Mustang GT + 2010 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Hershey, PA
Posts: 173
|
Actually these were my prices
2011 Mustang GT 5.0 - 34,821 2010 Camaro 2SS - 36,347 Not that big of a deal but to clear things up on average a Mustang is cheaper. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
![]() Drives: 2009 G8 GT Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() ![]() |
The article basically says that as the second fastest and cheapest that we got our money's worth with an SS.
Cudos to Ford and Dodge as well. ![]() I'm surprised the base GT and Charger were not on the list. They should have been. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
LOL at most people here.
Drives: 2005 GTO,2006 M6, 2007 300 Touring Join Date: May 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 1,331
|
ok there seems to be alot of people that aren't understanding how bad they messed up all the mustang number. The Shelby is 550 hp 505tq and even if they were using 2010 GT numbers its 315hp 325tq. So again they butchered the mustang numbers all around. There has and isnt no V-8 mustang ever rated 305hp and 208tq. This article loses all points it tries to make when they can't even proof read their article before publishing it. Freakin dummies
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CAMARO WIKI | Tran | Wiki | 67 | 11-27-2024 09:02 AM |
| 5th Gen Suspension -- The Book | JusticePete | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 151 | 05-07-2015 06:52 PM |
| My Reivew of Camaro SS vs Mustang GT | ss ZHO | Chevy Camaro vs... | 6 | 06-05-2010 01:23 AM |
| Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release | Tran | Camaro Convertible Forum | 12 | 11-18-2009 08:05 PM |