![]() |
|
|
#15 |
![]() Drives: ex-500hp v6 mustang Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: arizona
Posts: 605
|
50hp is perfectly possible since hes running a turbo just like me.
410rwhp on 95 octane, 8* advance (i know, really low but its a stock motor) 454rwhp on 100octane, 14* advance thats 44rwhp, which is easily 50 crank hp and thats going 95-100 not even 91-100. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Helping Build America
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS,LS3 2013 Duramax 3500HD Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Freeport LPG Export
Posts: 3,836
|
I would argue that you are getting the gain from the tune, not the octane. Did you follow the link and read it? If you get a gain it is not the octane level. Read. Increased octane level adds zero hydrocarbons to the fuel mixture= no added power.
__________________
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit, what a ride!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
LVL 50 Troll Stomper
Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,463
|
Quote:
Its not because the higher octane inherently makes more power, its because you can tune the engine into a "harsher" range that makes more power that would usually cause detonation with lower octane. Notice your timing advance that you quoted.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |||
![]() Drives: ex-500hp v6 mustang Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: arizona
Posts: 605
|
Quote:
Quote:
thank you both, but i know how engines and octane works. i nevermeant to imply i gained this numbers with "only higher octane" i posted the timing numbers because as he said it was with the "push of a button" that he gained the horsepower, designating he was runnng a different tune, as are my numbers on differet tunes. Quote:
i was replying to this comment "Why do people believe all the nonsense other people write? Andyrew, 50 HP? you're crazy." |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() |
here in patterson theres a 76 that has 100 octain,
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm not going to stand on either side of this issue. To be honest, I really don't know if a simple boost in octane will do anything for power. But I will say one thing....using Wikipedia as a reliable proof of anything is completely pointless. Wikipedia is full of crap on many, many, many issues because absolutely anyone (even some uneducated dumb-a$$) can go in and edit any topic and add whatever they "believe" is true. I'm sure you could google the octane facts and find whatever the truth is, but trusting Wikipedia is not a reliable source.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |||
|
Truth Enforcer
Drives: anything I can get my hands on Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 22,797
|
Quote:
higher octane doesnt just add power, it allows you to run a higher spark advance allowing you to burn the mixture longer and more completely, which is what leads to the increase in power. .
__________________
Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff
A group as a whole tends to be smarter than the smartest person in that group until one jackass convinces everyone otherwise. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Not easy being Green
Drives: 67 Nova SS Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 2,256
|
Don't forget higher compression
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Snark snark snark
Drives: RX350 Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 3L Hell
Posts: 555
|
I'm glad to see that the massive fail in this thread is balanced by a small portion of solid knowledge.
Running 100 octane in a stock motor is a waste of money. It's like running 93 in a car that is built and tuned for 89. Pointless. Absolutely pointless. However if you really think that 100 octane gives you a performance boost, why don't you try C16? (Who wants to take bets on how long it takes for someone to actually take my advice and blow a motor?)
__________________
What is this, CorvetteForum Lite?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Not easy being Green
Drives: 67 Nova SS Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 2,256
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Z28 Hold Out!
Drives: 2000 Monte Carlo SS Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wichita, Ks.
Posts: 351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
![]() Drives: '91 Z-28 Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Snark snark snark
Drives: RX350 Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 3L Hell
Posts: 555
|
Quote:
Yes, it makes a difference in cars that are rated for higher octane. What's your point? GM tunes the LS3 for 91 and lets the knock retard pull timing for idiots who put 89 or 87 in the car. Obviously they'll dyno lower. STILL doesn't mean it's going to run better on 100.
__________________
What is this, CorvetteForum Lite?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
![]() |
Quote:
u can gain power, just by using a better tune on regular 91 octane, now throw in 100 ur looking at more hp potential due to more aggressive tuning capabilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What Octane will the SS be rated? | fastfret7 | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 106 | 03-18-2009 04:47 PM |
| Premium recommended? | Rocks RS | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 37 | 08-04-2008 03:35 PM |
| Octane Booster and synthetic oil | big_bank5000 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 25 | 05-14-2008 04:32 PM |
| 100 posts | bouncertime | Off-topic Discussions | 12 | 03-08-2008 04:16 AM |