Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Chevy Camaro vs...


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-08-2010, 10:21 AM   #309
alrox
 
Drives: corvette
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
My experiences and experiences of people I know show that is flawed, if it was 100% true we would all be having major issues, correct?
Not correct. You should look at what those numbers mean.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
And saying the more you buy from a company the chance you have of getting a bad apple is true no matter what brand you buy.
This is true, but short sighted. Any car maker can produce a single bad car. The poll shows that Chyrsler makes more bad cars than others do.
alrox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 10:26 AM   #310
bigearl
 
bigearl's Avatar
 
Drives: 10 Camaro 2lt
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Napa
Posts: 553
Quote:
Originally Posted by alrox View Post
Polls have been proven many times to be reliable. The results are always consistent as well: Chrysler comes in far below average every time.

Why do you think they come in below average?
The Stratus.

But let me ask you a question Alrox. Did you staunchly stand beside Chevrolet when they were scoring poorly on these JD Powers surveys? I mean they're still below average on initial quality. Are you going to ditch whatever cars you have for a Porsche or Acura? Because if I'm going to use what you provided as evidence, then that's what you need to do.

In fact, I'd say that the logical conclusion to using JD Powers or Consumer Reports or whatever as your anti-Chrysler argument is that if you bought a GM product between 1980 and 1999 then you haven't got a leg to stand on.
__________________
-----------
Sharks have a week dedicated to me.
bigearl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 10:28 AM   #311
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by alrox View Post
Not correct. You should look at what those numbers mean.



This is true, but short sighted. Any car maker can produce a single bad car. The poll shows that Chyrsler makes more bad cars than others do.
I am sorry, but polls are not scientific fact, merely the opinion of those polled. Again my experience is totally oposite of these apparent polls.
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 11:04 AM   #312
alrox
 
Drives: corvette
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigearl View Post
The Stratus.

But let me ask you a question Alrox. Did you staunchly stand beside Chevrolet when they were scoring poorly on these JD Powers surveys?
No. Chevrolet makes poor products as well. I think Chevrolet still relies on worthless SUV's too much even after wasting billions on them they didn't deserve. The company should be in bankrupcy hearings right along with Chrysler.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigearl View Post
Are you going to ditch whatever cars you have for a Porsche or Acura? Because if I'm going to use what you provided as evidence, then that's what you need to do.
No I'm not. Neither of those companies make a product I want regardless of quality.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigearl View Post
In fact, I'd say that the logical conclusion to using JD Powers or Consumer Reports or whatever as your anti-Chrysler argument is that if you bought a GM product between 1980 and 1999 then you haven't got a leg to stand on.
I have never owned a GM product between MY 1980 and 1999.

Chrysler has historically, recently and consistently come in under average in quality and satisfaction. They are a poor performing car company and the majority of the american public agrees with me.
alrox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 11:06 AM   #313
alrox
 
Drives: corvette
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
I am sorry, but polls are not scientific fact, merely the opinion of those polled. Again my experience is totally oposite of these apparent polls.
I am sorry as well, but the quality poll is not 'opinion', they are 'facts' Real people had real problems with their cars and reported them to JD Power. Nothing more, nothing less.

JD Power does a very wide poll and Chrysler has had poor performance for all of modern history.
alrox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 11:13 AM   #314
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by alrox View Post
I am sorry as well, but the quality poll is not 'opinion', they are 'facts' Real people had real problems with their cars and reported them to JD Power. Nothing more, nothing less.

JD Power does a very wide poll and Chrysler has had poor performance for all of modern history.
Um, no, a poll is an attemopt at a statistic, what was the size of their control group? Were they from various regions? Where the problems major or minor issues? What is their stated margin of error (there is always one with any kind of poll). Have you ever owned a Chrysler product as I have and do to be spouting the make crap cars? Didn't think so. Any Lemming that goes by a poll in a consumer rag such as JD powers and Consumer Reports (don't even get me started here).
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 11:29 AM   #315
alrox
 
Drives: corvette
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
Um, no, a poll is an attemopt at a statistic, what was the size of their control group? Were they from various regions? Where the problems major or minor issues? What is their stated margin of error (there is always one with any kind of poll).
These are all questions that you can answer for yourself on the JD Powers website.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post

Have you ever owned a Chrysler product as I have and do to be spouting the make crap cars?
No, and it doesn't matter. If you take nothing else away from this, just remember "Personal experiences mean nothing".
alrox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 11:34 AM   #316
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by alrox View Post
These are all questions that you can answer for yourself on the JD Powers website.

No, and it doesn't matter. If you take nothing else away from this, just remember "Personal experiences mean nothing".
How can personal experiences mean nothing???? they are where I get MY opinions and experiences which shapes MY thoughts on a subject? And you started the whole poll thing so please give me a link that shows the answers to the above questions.
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 11:37 AM   #317
2010-1SS-IBM

 
Drives: 1998 Nissan, 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 827
Jesus, look at this thread.

THIS IS WHY WE CAN'T HAVE NICE THINGS!
2010-1SS-IBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 11:37 AM   #318
alrox
 
Drives: corvette
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
How can personal experiences mean nothing???? they are where I get MY opinions and experiences which shapes MY thoughts on a subject? And you started the whole poll thing so please give me a link that shows the answers to the above questions.
Personal experience with a single car(the one you own) does not indicate overall quality or future quality. The poll indicates that.

I'm not going to do your legwork. You know how to use a webpage. That information isn't a secret.

You will not debunk a widely accepted and used poll by looking at the backend specifics either.
alrox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 11:38 AM   #319
ViperTomcat
Banned
 
Drives: 2011 Avenger Heat
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,697
ViperTomcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 11:52 AM   #320
ULTRAZLS1


 
ULTRAZLS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,423
You both have your points.

Stew. I agree that polls are not 100% true and accurate. And that given chrysler products could far exceed what these polls/surveys indicate. How can they possibly take into account how well a vehicle is taken care of? What if someone took it out and beat the piss out of it and broke something? I know some people who never change their oil. But then we dont know if Chrysler owners have a tendency to do this more or less than with other cars. Among others things (poll size, type of problem etc.) their are far too many variables to consider these polls the "last word" when it comes to the overall reliability of a given product.

But I also know what alrox is talking about. Chrysler is consistently behind when it comes to these quality surveys. Do they mean something...yes. Do they mean everything...no.

You both have flaws in your arguments and both fail to admit them. Not dogging you guys...I am the same way sometimes. When arguing something like this a simple answer is not going to be found...you guys might as well hang it up LOL.

In my experience I have had the bets luck with GM vehicles. We have also had some very good Ford products. My dads 93 escort went 320k on the original Motor/transmission/starter...hell even the CV joints (we oiled them to keep the rubber moist every oil change). But we do our own work and the car was always properly serviced. The car might not have made 100k under the care of a jack ass.The only reason we retired the car was because the frame started to rot.

All in all I would say we had the worst luck with chrysler products. But we never bought them new...so I have no idea of how the past was on these vehicles so this is not a totally fair assumption either.

This is why I say buy what you like. I think a majority of quality issues comes down to how a person treats their vehicle. I truly believe that most of the time if you treat a vehicle right you will have minimal problems. (and you never know how your mechanic is treating it etc.). This is also why I do all of my own mechanic work.
ULTRAZLS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 12:07 PM   #321
alrox
 
Drives: corvette
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1 View Post
You both have flaws in your arguments and both fail to admit them.
You fail to understand my argument or you're just wrong.
alrox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 12:10 PM   #322
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1 View Post
You both have your points.

Stew. I agree that polls are not 100% true and accurate. And that given chrysler products could far exceed what these polls/surveys indicate. How can they possibly take into account how well a vehicle is taken care of? What if someone took it out and beat the piss out of it and broke something? I know some people who never change their oil. But then we dont know if Chrysler owners have a tendency to do this more or less than with other cars. Among others things (poll size, type of problem etc.) their are far too many variables to consider these polls the "last word" when it comes to the overall reliability of a given product.

But I also know what alrox is talking about. Chrysler is consistently behind when it comes to these quality surveys. Do they mean something...yes. Do they mean everything...no.

You both have flaws in your arguments and both fail to admit them. Not dogging you guys...I am the same way sometimes. When arguing something like this a simple answer is not going to be found...you guys might as well hang it up LOL.

In my experience I have had the bets luck with GM vehicles. We have also had some very good Ford products. My dads 93 escort went 320k on the original Motor/transmission/starter...hell even the CV joints (we oiled them to keep the rubber moist every oil change). But we do our own work and the car was always properly serviced. The car might not have made 100k under the care of a jack ass.The only reason we retired the car was because the frame started to rot.

All in all I would say we had the worst luck with chrysler products. But we never bought them new...so I have no idea of how the past was on these vehicles so this is not a totally fair assumption either.

This is why I say buy what you like. I think a majority of quality issues comes down to how a person treats their vehicle. I truly believe that most of the time if you treat a vehicle right you will have minimal problems. (and you never know how your mechanic is treating it etc.). This is also why I do all of my own mechanic work.
You ready for a bombshell, i agree with you 100% on basically every account and with that I am done. We are all going to buy what we like regardless of somewhat else or some rag says.
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PQs Camaro [COTW 9/20/10] PQ Member Car Journals 5675 09-01-2024 07:48 AM
Camaro Product Manager - interview Moose 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 11 04-04-2012 06:10 PM
Think about this and the Z28 5th gen 13F20 Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics 41 09-04-2010 12:59 AM
an awesome day on the pacific coast highway (aka my camaro review, long, pics) diddiyo Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery 10 07-08-2010 07:54 PM
Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release Tran Camaro Convertible Forum 12 11-18-2009 07:05 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.