11-22-2013, 04:52 PM | #323 | |
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
|
|
11-22-2013, 04:53 PM | #324 |
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Stock means as it comes from the factory. Just because a car has a FACTORY supercharger does not mean it isn't stock, it just means it is more blessed from the factory.......
|
11-24-2013, 09:38 PM | #325 |
Drives: 2011 camaro ss Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: houston
Posts: 464
|
i know there heavy but from factory 12s should feel better and run better... they are but i thought it would feel fast it really dies out after 1st gear and then the one my cousin raced was slow too.. i like them but i thought they feel a little faster imo not worth 50k they should feel way faster for 50k
|
11-24-2013, 09:40 PM | #326 |
Drives: 2011 camaro ss Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: houston
Posts: 464
|
the 2007 gt500 run low 12s man they seemed super slow I've seen a couple on the street run and they don't look like 12 second cars…. guess they are i thought they were the worst gt500 made compared to the 2013 lol
|
11-28-2013, 05:38 AM | #327 | |
Drives: racecars Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: BMN
Posts: 1,776
|
Quote:
.4 tenths is nothing, throw a tune and slicks on the gto for 500 bucks and it's right with the gt500 I went from a 13.2 to a 12.7 with literally nothing changed to my Camaro besides a cutout, it was just a cooler day.... like I said |
|
11-28-2013, 11:09 AM | #328 |
|
They've run as fast as 12.20s bone stock, down to the tire. It's a hard car to get off the line right. And you're right, it is the "worst" GT500, especially compared to the 13+. Didn't the 13 run a best of 11.20 or 11.30 stock? Haven't really researched it much since I can't buy one anyways but I thought I read that somewhere.
__________________
2018 Mustang GT
|
11-28-2013, 12:59 PM | #329 |
Love me some Tacos
|
Is it me or did this thread take a turn for the worst...
How does this.... 13' 1LE VS 10' challenger R/T hemi 5.7 Translate into a 4th gen Camaro, then a butt ugly 5.0, then back to a GT500... For those that may not know this... It is possible to start a new thread... |
11-28-2013, 01:59 PM | #330 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
2018 Mustang GT
|
|
11-28-2013, 02:57 PM | #331 | |
2013 Super Bee
Drives: 2013 Super Bee Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Jacksonville FL.
Posts: 711
|
Quote:
__________________
2007 Procharged SRT8 Charger..........SOLD
2010 Mopar 10 Challenger.................SOLD 2010 R/T Classic Challenger...............SOLD 2011 392 Challenger.........................SOLD 2012 mid 10 second 1/4 mile GT500.... SOLD Current ride 100% stock 2013 Plum SuperBee............best of 12.407 @ 114.28 for now. Tune, CAI and Drag radials. Best of 12.00 @ 115.74 |
|
11-28-2013, 07:32 PM | #332 |
Love me some Tacos
|
No... (haha)
I just thought wow this thread has so many responses... Wait only to page 3 is it relevant.. Safe to say a Ford Mustang be it GT or GT500 is not a decent track car. It is though a decent 1/4 mile car. My opinion based on all the one sided information I choose to read. |
11-29-2013, 10:01 PM | #333 | |
|
Quote:
C&D: 0-60 in 4.2, 12.6 1/4mile at 115mph, 4305lbs MotorTrend: 0-60 in 4.4, 12.8 1/4mile at 112mph, 4271lbs Edmunds: 0-60 in 4.6, 12.8 1/4mile at 110mph, 4371lbs MotorWeek: 0-60 in 4.9, 12.9 1/4mile at 110mph This gives us an average of 0-60 in 4.5, 12.8 1/4mile at 112mph for the 392 Charger.
__________________
2012 - Present: 2011 CTS-V Sedan, A6, Airaid, Zmax TB and Tune by R.P.M. = 535 hp/503 lb-ft.
2009 - 2012: 2010 2SS RS IBM M6, MGW Shifter, BMR Trailing Arms/Tunnel Brace, Roto-Fab CAI, VMAX Ported TB, Kooks 6511-Complete (Headers, X-Pipe, Mufflers), dyno tuned by R.P.M. = 415 hp/412 lb-ft. "Not giving a f*^k is truly the greatest luxury, and no luxury car gives fewer f*^k's than a CTS-V." - Matt Hardigree |
|
11-30-2013, 06:47 AM | #334 | |
2013 Super Bee
Drives: 2013 Super Bee Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Jacksonville FL.
Posts: 711
|
Quote:
OOooooooo, mag times again??? Don't worry about the real world numbers. Go for the mag times, those are the most accurate right....LOL. Dont worry about these time slips right here. They cant be accurate right??? A mag didn't do them......
__________________
2007 Procharged SRT8 Charger..........SOLD
2010 Mopar 10 Challenger.................SOLD 2010 R/T Classic Challenger...............SOLD 2011 392 Challenger.........................SOLD 2012 mid 10 second 1/4 mile GT500.... SOLD Current ride 100% stock 2013 Plum SuperBee............best of 12.407 @ 114.28 for now. Tune, CAI and Drag radials. Best of 12.00 @ 115.74 |
|
11-30-2013, 07:19 AM | #335 |
Drives: racecars Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: BMN
Posts: 1,776
|
Lol reminds me of a local guy who went to Tulsa and ran a claimed 12.0 @ 118 mph in his intake/tune only 2013 5.0 on slicks and skinnies.
|
11-30-2013, 07:35 AM | #336 | |
2013 Super Bee
Drives: 2013 Super Bee Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Jacksonville FL.
Posts: 711
|
Quote:
That's about what they run with intake, tune, bigs and littles......Ive seen em in the 11's with those mods. My friends 2011 5.0 ran an 11.9 @ 120 with intake, tune, mid pipe and 18" drag radials. It was a factory 3.73 gear car....... My other friends automatic 2012 5.0 ran a 12.0 @ 119 with just tune, intake, GT500 mufflers and slicks. Pretty common...........
__________________
2007 Procharged SRT8 Charger..........SOLD
2010 Mopar 10 Challenger.................SOLD 2010 R/T Classic Challenger...............SOLD 2011 392 Challenger.........................SOLD 2012 mid 10 second 1/4 mile GT500.... SOLD Current ride 100% stock 2013 Plum SuperBee............best of 12.407 @ 114.28 for now. Tune, CAI and Drag radials. Best of 12.00 @ 115.74 |
|
|
|
|
|