Introducing the JacFab CAI system! Dyno numbers, and videos inside. - Page 25 - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

Jason@JacFab · 05-10-2013, 06:18 AM

Firefighter · 05-10-2013, 10:07 AM

Jason, are you gonna make me pull out the Fry "Take my MONEY" picture...

Sent from my friggin Droid by two thumbs using Tapatalk 2 or whatever the ish it's called....

Smirnoff · 05-10-2013, 12:27 PM

Bump for the friday delay.

Firefighter · 05-18-2013, 08:08 PM

Any news Jason? I'm wanting your intake.

IndeedSS1 · 05-18-2013, 08:45 PM

I bet you'll see something shortly

Firefighter · 05-18-2013, 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IndeedSS1

I bet you'll see something shortly

I hope you are right. I would like to make it my next purchase.

Jason@JacFab · 05-18-2013, 09:44 PM

Dyno testing went well I suppose... The Cold Rush intake is showing appx. the same gains as it has in the past on a different dyno, so that's a plus. The "cold runs vs hot runs" really showed some surprising results. The "competitor's" intake managed to stay within 3 hp of it's hot and cold runs while the stock intake lost 7hp from the repeatable cold numbers to repeatable hot numbers, and the JF Cold Rush lost 9hp from the repeatable cold to hot runs...

Defining cold/hot: A new intake was put on cold. The car was started, and with the radiator fans hot wired on via the fan trick, the CLT was allowed to stabilize at it's lowest point with the hood open. Typically the CLT would get down to 199 before the runs were started with the exception of the last run which was the JF intake was started at 203 because it wasn't getting any colder, at the time the CLT was deemed at it's lowest point, the fans were turned off and the hood closed for the runs... For the "hot" runs, the hood was left closed after 3-5 "cold" runs (after a repeatable number was run), and the car idled for appx 5 minutes, when the "hot runs" were started the CLT was always about 216 +- 1-2 deg, then the car was run again until a repeatable "hot" number was run...

Unfortunately, I don't have the dyno sheets as the printer was not working as per my usual luck when I go to dyno something :( I'm currently waiting for the run files to be emailed to me, but im sure it won't be until Monday at the earliest now as I haven't received them yet. I do have all of the run numbers written down, just no curves.

Keep in mind, not only am I on a different dyno, but I've also added high flow cats, and a ported TB since my last time on the dyno, so the numbers won't really coincide with older numbers exactly since they are higher.

*EDIT 5/25/13* SEE MY NEXT POST FOR DYNO NUMBERS, AND DYNO GRAPH

Needless to say, it was interesting. I expected more of Brand X, but I find it hard to believe that the dyno, or the testing was being run improperly as I've tested my intake 3 times now, on 2 different dynos, with 3 different operators, and my outcome over stock has been about the same each time. This was the first and only time I have, or plan to run Brand X on the Dyno.

A note on these numbers, posted... Typically I will junk the high and low numbers, although in this instance the Cold Rush instance was a repeatable number so I kept it, the Brand X cold run "repeatable" number is less than shown, but I'm giving it the benefit of the doubt with it's highest run as I thought it would be more... "Hot" run numbers shows the highest run from two runs that were within 0.8hp of each other.

I will edit this once I have dyno charts to post.

14pilot · 05-18-2013, 09:59 PM

Very exciting news !!!

Firefighter · 05-18-2013, 10:32 PM

Sounds good man... damned if I can find the "Fry, Take my Money" picture... lol

1989GTA · 05-18-2013, 10:33 PM

Wow! Those are great numbers. It looks like your are really on to something. I am going to make sure my home made CAI is insulated real well on my 65 Skylark. The results seem to be well worth the extra effort. Then again maybe some of your parts will work on my car.

litle88 · 05-18-2013, 10:42 PM

Very impressive Jason!!

Denis · 05-18-2013, 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Firefighter

Sounds good man... damned if I can find the "Fry, Take my Money" picture... lol

I got it covered

Very nice results. Looking forward to seeing this finally in production.

Firefighter · 05-18-2013, 11:22 PM

I was looking for one I have saved without the shut up part... That works though. Thanks.

Denis · 05-18-2013, 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Firefighter

I was looking for one I have saved without the shut up part... That works though. Thanks.

Haha okay good deal

05-10-2013, 10:07 AM	#338
Firefighter Drives: Black '13 2SS/RS/1LE w/NPP/NAV Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Tampa by way of Miami... Posts: 4,934	Jason, are you gonna make me pull out the Fry "Take my MONEY" picture... Sent from my friggin Droid by two thumbs using Tapatalk 2 or whatever the ish it's called.... __________________ My Build Thread... http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=285054

05-10-2013, 12:27 PM	#339
Smirnoff Drives: Camaro SS Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Motorcity Dragway Posts: 978	Bump for the friday delay. __________________ 11.90's w/headers, CAI, custom tune, slicks/skinnys, shifter & 100+ Ethyl.

05-18-2013, 08:45 PM	#341
IndeedSS1 Drives: 2010 Camaro SS LS3 Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Eastern MO Posts: 3,786	I bet you'll see something shortly __________________ She is only memory now.

05-18-2013, 09:44 PM	#343
Jason@JacFab Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Central Point, OR Posts: 5,685 View My Garage	Dyno testing went well I suppose... The Cold Rush intake is showing appx. the same gains as it has in the past on a different dyno, so that's a plus. The "cold runs vs hot runs" really showed some surprising results. The "competitor's" intake managed to stay within 3 hp of it's hot and cold runs while the stock intake lost 7hp from the repeatable cold numbers to repeatable hot numbers, and the JF Cold Rush lost 9hp from the repeatable cold to hot runs... Defining cold/hot: A new intake was put on cold. The car was started, and with the radiator fans hot wired on via the fan trick, the CLT was allowed to stabilize at it's lowest point with the hood open. Typically the CLT would get down to 199 before the runs were started with the exception of the last run which was the JF intake was started at 203 because it wasn't getting any colder, at the time the CLT was deemed at it's lowest point, the fans were turned off and the hood closed for the runs... For the "hot" runs, the hood was left closed after 3-5 "cold" runs (after a repeatable number was run), and the car idled for appx 5 minutes, when the "hot runs" were started the CLT was always about 216 +- 1-2 deg, then the car was run again until a repeatable "hot" number was run... Unfortunately, I don't have the dyno sheets as the printer was not working as per my usual luck when I go to dyno something :( I'm currently waiting for the run files to be emailed to me, but im sure it won't be until Monday at the earliest now as I haven't received them yet. I do have all of the run numbers written down, just no curves. Keep in mind, not only am I on a different dyno, but I've also added high flow cats, and a ported TB since my last time on the dyno, so the numbers won't really coincide with older numbers exactly since they are higher. EDIT 5/25/13 SEE MY NEXT POST FOR DYNO NUMBERS, AND DYNO GRAPH Needless to say, it was interesting. I expected more of Brand X, but I find it hard to believe that the dyno, or the testing was being run improperly as I've tested my intake 3 times now, on 2 different dynos, with 3 different operators, and my outcome over stock has been about the same each time. This was the first and only time I have, or plan to run Brand X on the Dyno. A note on these numbers, posted... Typically I will junk the high and low numbers, although in this instance the Cold Rush instance was a repeatable number so I kept it, the Brand X cold run "repeatable" number is less than shown, but I'm giving it the benefit of the doubt with it's highest run as I thought it would be more... "Hot" run numbers shows the highest run from two runs that were within 0.8hp of each other. I will edit this once I have dyno charts to post. Last edited by Jason@JacFab; 05-25-2013 at 02:51 PM.

05-18-2013, 10:42 PM	#347
litle88 V8 Lounge member #2 Drives: 2001 Ws6 Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Burbank,IL Posts: 6,373	Very impressive Jason!! __________________ 2001 ws6, 40k miles, Ls3 416 stroker, short block built by PER the rest by me. LPE Ls3 heads milled to 12-1 comp, FAST 102, NW 102, kooks 2", dual DMH cutouts, Magnaflow C/B, BTR cam + springs. Full UMI suspension.

05-10-2013, 06:18 AM	#337
Jason@JacFab Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Central Point, OR Posts: 5,685 View My Garage

05-18-2013, 08:08 PM	#340
Firefighter Drives: Black '13 2SS/RS/1LE w/NPP/NAV Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Tampa by way of Miami... Posts: 4,934	Any news Jason? I'm wanting your intake.

05-18-2013, 10:32 PM	#345
Firefighter Drives: Black '13 2SS/RS/1LE w/NPP/NAV Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Tampa by way of Miami... Posts: 4,934	Sounds good man... damned if I can find the "Fry, Take my Money" picture... lol

05-18-2013, 10:33 PM	#346
1989GTA Drives: 1989 GTA Trans Am Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Cypress, California Posts: 610	Wow! Those are great numbers. It looks like your are really on to something. I am going to make sure my home made CAI is insulated real well on my 65 Skylark. The results seem to be well worth the extra effort. Then again maybe some of your parts will work on my car.

05-18-2013, 11:22 PM	#349
Firefighter Drives: Black '13 2SS/RS/1LE w/NPP/NAV Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Tampa by way of Miami... Posts: 4,934	I was looking for one I have saved without the shut up part... That works though. Thanks.