![]() |
|
|
#29 | |
|
His seafaringness
Drives: yugo Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: the somewhere in the pacific ocean
Posts: 128
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Moderator.ca
|
If you want to use 13.3 on the Nissan, use 12.8 on the SS.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
![]() Drives: 2SS RS Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 305
|
GTR gets smoked by the ZR1 WHAT ARE U TALKING ABOUT!! SMILES
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
1st Civ. Div.
Drives: Camaroless for now...RIP "Big SexZ" Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 2,729
|
the first season of speeds "bull run" showed that while the nissan was pretty agile, it finished in the lower ranks most of the time even with upgraded speed parts.
i know it was just a tv show but if we are talking speed and handling dollars being spent, i want power, reliability, and drivability for a price that will not break my bank account. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
His seafaringness
Drives: yugo Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: the somewhere in the pacific ocean
Posts: 128
|
IDk its pretty close in acceleration and it has much superior handling and roadhoalding. I think as far as performance goes the nism 370z has the camaro ss beat. I'm not saying I like it better but, It seems to greatly outperform the camaro.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
His seafaringness
Drives: yugo Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: the somewhere in the pacific ocean
Posts: 128
|
Quote:
forget about getting power out of vq in less you wanna spend 20000 on twin turbo or even more for NA tuning!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wow some of the stuff in here is soooooo wrong. The 370z biggest negative against the SS IS THE LACK OF TORQUE. sorry had caps on LOL. The 370z fully loaded is 40000 not 42000. The nismo probably won't have the navigation etc so I will say 40000ish. Regular 0-60 is 4.7 1/4 mile 13.3. The nismo can easily do 4.4/.5 and 12.8/13 1/4. If you step outside the kool aid you will see the Z is an amazing car/compertitor
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
1st Civ. Div.
Drives: Camaroless for now...RIP "Big SexZ" Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 2,729
|
Quote:
Camaro for me!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Moderator.ca
|
Can someone please explain why you think its getting much better straight line acceleration vs the regular 370? Yes it has more power, but also more weight and practically no more torque. The extra engine performance is almost all at the top end. Good for a road course, doesn't mean much at the strip. I am not a drag racer, but I have never heard of 20 hp improving things by half a second or more. In the Camaro, 26 hp and 50 lbs less weight is only good for 0.3s.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
And look at the mph difference, the camaro is at 110-111, the z is at what, 103? The camaro is pulling away very fast with much steeper gearing. IMO you can't just look at ET because driveability and useable power shows up in the mph. The z is geared very aggressively to achieve those numbers, the camaro is barely trying...I don't think there is much excitement with the z below about 5000 rpm, peak hp numbers are only for advertising.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Without a doubt. The torque is the deal!! Like I said above the lack of torque is it's biggest downfall and it seems with the vq the higher the hp the lower the torque. Unlike the chevy smallblock v8 where torque is almost always even to HP
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
![]() |
Torque is good, not to mention the sound of a V8. Plus, do you really want a car named NISMO?
I think the 370 looks like some kind of robot bug. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
|
Quote:
Compare that with 13.0 @ 110- 111 mph for the SS. As we know the SS should be running in the high 12s with a 111mph trap speed. And as you mentioned, as the speeds increase (80+mph), the SS's advantage will also increase. A 370z will get owned badly trying to keep up with an SS on the highway. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Camaro... soon Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,217
|
camaro 2ss/rs no question in my mind
LS3, bada-- exterior, LS3, leather interior with bluetooth and all that s--t, LS3, HIDs and 20" wheels, LS3 LS3??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| V8 Camaro Performance Upgrades List | Milk 1027 | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 93 | 08-30-2021 06:56 PM |
| Songs About Camaros (for your driving pleasure) | Emjay | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 74 | 12-18-2014 01:42 AM |
| Automobilemag.com: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro - Q&A | Scotsman | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 23 | 10-12-2008 01:13 AM |
| AW: New Camaro a one trick pony? | Scotsman | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 16 | 09-04-2008 10:07 PM |
| 2010 Chevy Camaro to offer two V6s at launch; Z28 to trump SS? | radz28 | Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics | 51 | 06-23-2008 01:12 PM |