Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-05-2009, 02:58 PM   #29
THE EVIL TW1N
Banned
 
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
So, we now have 2 runs on 2 cars on 2 different dynos, with 20 hp difference? I would not be surprised if the third puts 374 to the ground.
I'm thinking they should be putting down 370-375rwhp stock.
THE EVIL TW1N is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 03:00 PM   #30
THE EVIL TW1N
Banned
 
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc View Post
I would think to get certified and the requirement is within 1% that would mean it can't be any less than 1% of the stated figure. So if you are stating your HP is 500 it can't be less than 495 to be certified. I know the original purpose was to protect consumers from being cheated by misrepresenting values as being higher than they actually were. But if they actually were higher than stated that's not cheating anybody; you're getting more for your money than you thought (or they stated) you were.

I've always interpreted certification as being a guarantee of an "at least" value; but that's just me.
If I can find the source, I'll post it. I know it's all over the Corvette forums. But the engine must make +-1% of the SAE Certified rated power to be Certified. And it is SAE that picks the HP level it's certified at, not GM.
THE EVIL TW1N is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 03:36 PM   #31
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crazy Coast
Posts: 15,796
Thanks for the info'. All of these numbers are pretty impressive if you ask me, though the more the better
__________________

'20 ZL1 Black "Fury"
A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor
Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 04:46 PM   #32
kopacko
333RWHP / 12.2sec @ 1320'
 
Drives: 2004 Competition Orange Mach1
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 108
Send a message via MSN to kopacko
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE EVIL TW1N View Post
Also, another note. The LS3 is not underrated, its SAE Certified, it can't be underrated. It must make within +-1% of its rated power.
Underrated is the wrong term to use on this car. Given the headers, cats, and exhaust as well as the upper intake, I would say "restricted" is a better word. Change those out to high flow cats, etc and you will see an easy jump in HP for little to no $$

My Mach1 was the same way. Rated at 305 at the crank. I swapped the exhaust and intake and reprogrammed the air/fuel ratio and I have (at last dyno SAE corrected) 333rwhp.
kopacko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 05:09 PM   #33
syr74
Account Suspended
 
Drives: Thunderbird
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 951
Here is a brief rundown of SAE 'certified' specs as per an article in Motor Trend. If you want to be SAE 'certified' you do indeed have to post your hp ratings within -+1 percent of the SAE findings and then you have to guarantee that all production engines will produce within two percent either way of that power rating.

This isn't a secret, the new SAE certs are a known quantity by this juncture.

http://motortrend.automotive.com/364...gue/index.html

Very few new cars are seriously under-rated, as attested to by the fact that most manual transmission cars run on a DYnojet will correct to within a hair of their factory power ratings given an ~11% correction factor, which is pretty much the loss you can expect through a modern manual transmission.
syr74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 07:52 PM   #34
mike@newera
 
mike@newera's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 529
You are going to find different dynos are going to show different numbers, especially different dyno manufacturers.
mike@newera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 08:32 PM   #35
SS 376

 
SS 376's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 IBM 1SS (Former)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NoVA
Posts: 2,031
365, 375, 385 whp. Doesn't matter! I'll take it. Where's my hammer?
SS 376 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 08:47 PM   #36
fdjizm
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2008 Mustang GT/CS
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,429
i have a feeling the OP isnt coming back to offer anymore info lol... just expect 450+ hp camaros lol
fdjizm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 08:49 PM   #37
DeathChill

 
Drives: 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 2.0T
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Mission, BC
Posts: 862
It's neat to show those who swear by dyno's but useless for anything else. You don't win races on a dyno.
DeathChill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 08:53 PM   #38
MrGazinya

 
MrGazinya's Avatar
 
Drives: Aggressive
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southampton, PA.
Posts: 1,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by fdjizm View Post
i have a feeling the OP isnt coming back to offer anymore info lol... just expect 450+ hp camaros lol
http://www.5thgen.org/forum/showthread.php?t=12930&page=3
__________________
Black 2SS RS LS3 Inferno Int. '17 1LE replica 20's {MODS} KOOKS LT: Borla S-Type: Roto-Fab CAI: Hurst ST.: PFADT Stage 2, Trailing arms, Tie Rods: ECS BigBlower Cam: Fast 102mm intake: Brian Tooley racing dual spring kit: TFS pushrod set: Katech C5R timing chain: Mellings high volume oil pump: ATI Balancer: Ideal performance upgraded clutch master cylinder:Tick performance upgraded slave cylinder/throwout bearing: Mantic 9000 twin disk clutch & light weight flywheel: Tuned by Doug Ring at ECS. 475RWHP/445RWTQ.Dynapack Dyno.

MrGazinya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 08:55 PM   #39
fdjizm
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2008 Mustang GT/CS
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrGazinya View Post
not seeing the clarification on the correction anywhere. maybe i missed it

btw if you dont run 12.8 at the track your dyno is way off i will wait till then to make my final call

trap speed should be a about 116-119mph?
fdjizm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 09:22 PM   #40
DeathChill

 
Drives: 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 2.0T
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Mission, BC
Posts: 862
Quote:
Originally Posted by fdjizm View Post
not seeing the clarification on the correction anywhere. maybe i missed it

btw if you dont run 12.8 at the track your dyno is way off i will wait till then to make my final call

trap speed should be a about 116-119mph?
I agree. I'm not saying the guy is a liar but no one's going to come out and say "Hey, we're probably a bit off."

Should be easy enough to prove at the track, no?
DeathChill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2009, 01:42 AM   #41
Doc
Dances With Mustangs
 
Doc's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 1SS/RS MT
Join Date: May 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 3,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by syr74 View Post
Here is a brief rundown of SAE 'certified' specs as per an article in Motor Trend. If you want to be SAE 'certified' you do indeed have to post your hp ratings within -+1 percent of the SAE findings and then you have to guarantee that all production engines will produce within two percent either way of that power rating.

This isn't a secret, the new SAE certs are a known quantity by this juncture.

http://motortrend.automotive.com/364...gue/index.html

Very few new cars are seriously under-rated, as attested to by the fact that most manual transmission cars run on a DYnojet will correct to within a hair of their factory power ratings given an ~11% correction factor, which is pretty much the loss you can expect through a modern manual transmission.
Okay reading the article you linked to it has this part:

"The certified output must be within one percent of the dynamometer output. Of course, ringer engines could easily be slipped through this process, but by certifying an engine the manufacturer guarantees all production engines will produce within two percent of the rated output (Europe allows five-percent deviation)."

I put bold on the part in bold which says a ringer can be slipped through. It seems like two things are being talked about. On the one hand it looks like it IS saying every engine produced will be +/- 1% of rated output. Yet it talks about ringers slipping through which contradicts that, UNLESS what the certification is actually saying is all production engines WILL produce within 2% of the rated value AT LEAST. That is different than saying all production engines MUST produce exactly that rating; no more, no less. If that were the case "ringers" wouldn't be possible.

The way the article is worded it's not exactly clear whether the certification is guaranteeing all engines must be that rated value ONLY, or since they speak of ringers, it means all engines must produce NO LESS than within 2% of the certified value but more than that (a ringer) is possible.

Either way it's good to see such strong numbers being guaranteed as a minimum.
Doc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2009, 04:45 AM   #42
TAG UR IT
www.Camaro5store.com
 
TAG UR IT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 ZL1 #705
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SA, Texas
Posts: 26,544
Not bad at all!.....let's see if we can get over that 400hp mark to the wheels by exhaust alone.....
TAG UR IT is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
V8 Camaro Performance Upgrades List Milk 1027 Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 93 08-30-2021 06:56 PM
Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release Tran Camaro Convertible Forum 12 11-18-2009 08:05 PM
4 SEMA CAMAROS finally unveiled by GM! (hi-res images & details) FenwickHockey65 Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery 237 11-03-2008 11:39 PM
AW: New Camaro a one trick pony? Scotsman 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 16 09-04-2008 10:07 PM
Camaro Chat 9:30-10:00 jdpickering 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 25 07-22-2008 03:11 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.