![]() |
|
|
#29 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Banned
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Petro-sexual
|
Thanks for the info'. All of these numbers are pretty impressive if you ask me, though the more the better
__________________
'20 ZL1 Black "Fury" A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
333RWHP / 12.2sec @ 1320'
Drives: 2004 Competition Orange Mach1 Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 108
|
Quote:
My Mach1 was the same way. Rated at 305 at the crank. I swapped the exhaust and intake and reprogrammed the air/fuel ratio and I have (at last dyno SAE corrected) 333rwhp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: Thunderbird Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 951
|
Here is a brief rundown of SAE 'certified' specs as per an article in Motor Trend. If you want to be SAE 'certified' you do indeed have to post your hp ratings within -+1 percent of the SAE findings and then you have to guarantee that all production engines will produce within two percent either way of that power rating.
This isn't a secret, the new SAE certs are a known quantity by this juncture. http://motortrend.automotive.com/364...gue/index.html Very few new cars are seriously under-rated, as attested to by the fact that most manual transmission cars run on a DYnojet will correct to within a hair of their factory power ratings given an ~11% correction factor, which is pretty much the loss you can expect through a modern manual transmission. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 529
|
You are going to find different dynos are going to show different numbers, especially different dyno manufacturers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 IBM 1SS (Former) Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NoVA
Posts: 2,031
|
365, 375, 385 whp. Doesn't matter! I'll take it.
Where's my hammer?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Account Suspended
|
i have a feeling the OP isnt coming back to offer anymore info lol... just expect 450+ hp camaros lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 2.0T Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Mission, BC
Posts: 862
|
It's neat to show those who swear by dyno's but useless for anything else. You don't win races on a dyno.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Aggressive Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southampton, PA.
Posts: 1,086
|
Quote:
__________________
Black 2SS RS LS3 Inferno Int. '17 1LE replica 20's {MODS} KOOKS LT: Borla S-Type: Roto-Fab CAI: Hurst ST.: PFADT Stage 2, Trailing arms, Tie Rods: ECS BigBlower Cam: Fast 102mm intake: Brian Tooley racing dual spring kit: TFS pushrod set: Katech C5R timing chain: Mellings high volume oil pump: ATI Balancer: Ideal performance upgraded clutch master cylinder:Tick performance upgraded slave cylinder/throwout bearing: Mantic 9000 twin disk clutch & light weight flywheel: Tuned by Doug Ring at ECS. 475RWHP/445RWTQ.Dynapack Dyno.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
btw if you dont run 12.8 at the track your dyno is way off i will wait till then to make my final call ![]() trap speed should be a about 116-119mph? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 2.0T Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Mission, BC
Posts: 862
|
Quote:
Should be easy enough to prove at the track, no? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
Dances With Mustangs
|
Quote:
"The certified output must be within one percent of the dynamometer output. Of course, ringer engines could easily be slipped through this process, but by certifying an engine the manufacturer guarantees all production engines will produce within two percent of the rated output (Europe allows five-percent deviation)." I put bold on the part in bold which says a ringer can be slipped through. It seems like two things are being talked about. On the one hand it looks like it IS saying every engine produced will be +/- 1% of rated output. Yet it talks about ringers slipping through which contradicts that, UNLESS what the certification is actually saying is all production engines WILL produce within 2% of the rated value AT LEAST. That is different than saying all production engines MUST produce exactly that rating; no more, no less. If that were the case "ringers" wouldn't be possible. The way the article is worded it's not exactly clear whether the certification is guaranteeing all engines must be that rated value ONLY, or since they speak of ringers, it means all engines must produce NO LESS than within 2% of the certified value but more than that (a ringer) is possible. Either way it's good to see such strong numbers being guaranteed as a minimum. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
www.Camaro5store.com
|
Not bad at all!.....let's see if we can get over that 400hp mark to the wheels by exhaust alone.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| V8 Camaro Performance Upgrades List | Milk 1027 | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 93 | 08-30-2021 06:56 PM |
| Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release | Tran | Camaro Convertible Forum | 12 | 11-18-2009 08:05 PM |
| 4 SEMA CAMAROS finally unveiled by GM! (hi-res images & details) | FenwickHockey65 | Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery | 237 | 11-03-2008 11:39 PM |
| AW: New Camaro a one trick pony? | Scotsman | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 16 | 09-04-2008 10:07 PM |
| Camaro Chat 9:30-10:00 | jdpickering | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 25 | 07-22-2008 03:11 PM |