2013 v6 1lt or 2009 mustang gt. which would win?

[302-412]

With an exceptional pilot a 260 hp 2v could get into the 13's. They could be pretty quick out of the hole. Here we go......... Motor trend got 14.00 @ 100mph, just besting the s/c Lightening they were testing at the time.

[302-412]

Originally Posted by 08-G35s/6MT

Lmao those 2v are all POS slow pathetic and should be stripped of any "muscle car" pretentions that ever came with it.... There were 3 last Friday with bolt ons and skinnys in front, slicks in back running 14's @ 93-97 mph ahahahah. An Accord from 10 years ago will walk one on the highway and they put less power to the ground then an accord of the same year

And we should give these "muscle car pretentions" to.........Accords?

[trademaster]

Originally Posted by 08-G35s/6MT

Lmao those 2v are all POS slow pathetic and should be stripped of any "muscle car" pretentions that ever came with it.... There were 3 last Friday with bolt ons and skinnys in front, slicks in back running 14's @ 93-97 mph ahahahah. An Accord from 10 years ago will walk one on the highway and they put less power to the ground then an accord of the same year

Every single time I see you post.

[RedWingsZL1]

Originally Posted by trademaster

Every single time I see you post.

[72MachOne99GT]

My '99 isnt fast by any means, but I went 13.6@100 with 4.10s a midpipe and catback on drag Radials.

Again, nothing great, but it used to feel fun *now it feels like it cant get out of its own way compared to the new car*

[NYYFan325]

If you want a guaranteed win vs a GT mustang in your V6 you'll have to go all the way back to the pre 99 GT's which put out 225 (or 215 I forget?) HP.

Torque and weight take away any HP advantage the V6 Camaro has!

[302-412]

I agree with you on that one NYY, one of the slower GT's since the 80's.