You are browsing camaro5 
 |
|
04-19-2015, 05:36 PM
|
#29 |
          
Drives: '21 ZLE A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mechanicsville, VA
Posts: 6,824
|
My reply came across like a jackass...it was not intentional. Looks like a good product but expensive.
__________________
'21 ZLE A10 Wild Cherry PDR 2:00.78 VIR Full 10.68@131.69 1.68 60'
'17 ZL1 A10 Mosaic Black PDR/Nav 2:03.08 VIR Full 11.003@129.2 1.75 (sold) '15 Z/28 #325 Black a/c & stereo. 2:10.1 VIR Full (sold) '12 ZL1 A6 Black 10.52@131 1.55 60' 2:13 VIR Full (sold) |
|
|
|
04-19-2015, 06:02 PM
|
#30 | |
 
|
Quote:
__________________
 "The walls are white, the track is grey, the grass is green, and the sky is blue... your job is to keep them all where they belong." - Johnny Rutherford |
|
|
|
|
|
04-20-2015, 11:42 PM
|
#31 |
Drives: '15 Z/28 Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 113
|
Ok, my mechanic at the dealer was kind enough to pull both out to compare. Big differences as stated are the number of holes in the top and that the PF64 has the anti-drain back valve near the top of the filter vs the 48R where it is near the bottom.
They all felt the 48R was the better quality filter but based on what GM is telling us, the cheaper filter is better. |
|
|
|
|
04-21-2015, 08:27 AM
|
#32 |
|
Drives: '21 ZLE A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mechanicsville, VA
Posts: 6,824
|
the difference is clear. I see why the PF-64 is prefered for track use vs the UPF48R.
__________________
'21 ZLE A10 Wild Cherry PDR 2:00.78 VIR Full 10.68@131.69 1.68 60'
'17 ZL1 A10 Mosaic Black PDR/Nav 2:03.08 VIR Full 11.003@129.2 1.75 (sold) '15 Z/28 #325 Black a/c & stereo. 2:10.1 VIR Full (sold) '12 ZL1 A6 Black 10.52@131 1.55 60' 2:13 VIR Full (sold) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
