LTs w/HF & CAI + Tune and Thoughts - Page 3 - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

370zyzfr1 · 06-13-2015, 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by angryBits

Haha, pulley swap definitely in order!

And new injectors.

1ZL4FUN · 06-16-2015, 11:48 AM

Thanks for the time to write this up. Good info!

Rick is really good. I know a lot of people saying good things about him and dyno results to prove it. I've never had him tune my cars but that may change. There aren't too many good guys in sacramento anymore. May be worth a drive for me.

I just had a baseline dyno on my car and don't laugh...440HP on a 90 degree day with my 6 speed and rotofab. The car was pulling out a lot of timing. It was pig rich at 10.5-10.8AFR. I believe it was a really old mustang dyno and not sure if there were any other factors that would explain the low numbers but Cali gas is pretty lame. He did leave the traction control on. Another thing we saw was 20HP less on a back to back runs. One run was only 400HP. So embarrassing. I might have to start calling my 95 a stock ZL1 killer. LOL!! It does put down more power and is lighter.

angryBits · 06-16-2015, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1ZL4FUN

Thanks for the time to write this up. Good info!

Rick is really good. I know a lot of people saying good things about him and dyno results to prove it. I've never had him tune my cars but that may change. There aren't too many good guys in sacramento anymore. May be worth a drive for me.

I just had a baseline dyno on my car and don't laugh...440HP on a 90 degree day with my 6 speed and rotofab. The car was pulling out a lot of timing. It was pig rich at 10.5-10.8AFR. I believe it was a really old mustang dyno and not sure if there were any other factors that would explain the low numbers but Cali gas is pretty lame. He did leave the traction control on. Another thing we saw was 20HP less on a back to back runs. One run was only 400HP. So embarrassing. I might have to start calling my 95 a stock ZL1 killer. LOL!! It does put down more power and is lighter.

California 91 octane gas will do that. This car was designed for 93 and for some of us it knocks pretty bad -- it did for me, which is why I got it tuned.

06-16-2015, 11:48 AM	#30
1ZL4FUN Drives: Red Beast X2 Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Norcal Posts: 177 View My Garage	Thanks for the time to write this up. Good info! Rick is really good. I know a lot of people saying good things about him and dyno results to prove it. I've never had him tune my cars but that may change. There aren't too many good guys in sacramento anymore. May be worth a drive for me. I just had a baseline dyno on my car and don't laugh...440HP on a 90 degree day with my 6 speed and rotofab. The car was pulling out a lot of timing. It was pig rich at 10.5-10.8AFR. I believe it was a really old mustang dyno and not sure if there were any other factors that would explain the low numbers but Cali gas is pretty lame. He did leave the traction control on. Another thing we saw was 20HP less on a back to back runs. One run was only 400HP. So embarrassing. I might have to start calling my 95 a stock ZL1 killer. LOL!! It does put down more power and is lighter. __________________ New ride 2017 Cadillac CTS V-Sport. High Tech Twin Turbo Cruiser. (sold then stolen) 2015 Red ZL1 M6 VIN: G1FL1EP5F9800197 FOR SALE 1995 Patriot Red 95Z28 M6 Project car. Less than 100k miles. 95 corvette motor. All good parts, too much to list. Just needs someone to put it together. (sold) 2002 CHP camaro B4C (sold) White 95Z A4 best 11.891 @ 114.269 boltons & weight reduction. Yes, it was a record. 11/13/02