08-20-2008, 01:29 PM | #29 | |
Drives: challenger Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
|
Quote:
|
|
08-20-2008, 01:31 PM | #30 | |
Drives: Buick Enclave/Corvette/2010 Camaro Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 421
|
Quote:
This my 1st post, but I wanted to weigh in and say your analysis is right on. The Camaro on paper, and referencing the Caddy CTS results should give the Challenger R/T quite a run for its money in performance, and excel in almost every other way. I agreed with everything you said. (wondering if you can turbo/supercharge a direct injection motor,...hmmm that might cause some concern to even those SRT8 owners ) |
|
08-20-2008, 01:32 PM | #31 | |
Drives: challenger Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
|
Quote:
|
|
08-20-2008, 01:37 PM | #32 |
Drives: Muscle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,315
|
|
08-20-2008, 01:44 PM | #33 |
Drives: challenger Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
|
you are sounding more and more like a fanboy everyday. The SS is slightly faster than the SS that is all. So take your OWN words and put it where the sun don't shine
jk |
08-20-2008, 01:49 PM | #34 | |
Drives: Muscle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,315
|
Quote:
been in country long time? lets compare shall we... 422 hp-3800lbs vs. 425 hp 4100lbs. hm. i wonder which will win... |
|
08-20-2008, 01:53 PM | #35 | |
Drives: challenger Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
|
Quote:
I meant to say the ss will be slightly faster than the challenger and GET IT RIGHT PLEASE 422 hp-3914 auto vs 425 hp-4140 auto when the challenger stick comes out then compare geez lol |
|
08-20-2008, 01:56 PM | #36 | |
Drives: Muscle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,315
|
Quote:
lol ahhh ok lets compare auto's then. 422hp - 3914 vs. 425 hp - 4140 ill still take the Camaro. and that goes for manual as well. especially with the short throw highperformance tranny. |
|
08-20-2008, 02:02 PM | #37 | |
Drives: challenger Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
|
Quote:
I made that up hence it being really bad |
|
08-20-2008, 02:07 PM | #38 |
Drives: Muscle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,315
|
|
08-20-2008, 02:12 PM | #39 |
Drives: challenger Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
|
|
08-20-2008, 02:15 PM | #40 | |
Drives: Muscle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,315
|
Quote:
And alot of attention can go either way, which is why there is so much criticism. Do you think people would bash the challenger so much if it was a more affordable car? |
|
08-20-2008, 02:17 PM | #41 |
Drives: SRT-4 Join Date: May 2008
Location: El Paso
Posts: 122
|
I believe a turbo V6 would be great competition for the SS &SRT8. That is a must see. Make it happen ppl. Plllllzzz.
__________________
I am a power junkie,
and forced induction is my fix. |
08-20-2008, 02:17 PM | #42 |
Rolling along...
|
Why does everyone use HP to compare performance?
Torque and gearing can go a long way in overcoming lower HP. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release | Tran | Camaro Convertible Forum | 12 | 11-18-2009 07:05 PM |
Detroit News panel wants GM to build Camaro concept | Tran | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 12 | 03-15-2009 04:38 PM |
The Camaro team at GM seeks answers | ChrisL | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 148 | 08-28-2008 08:47 PM |
Cheryl Pilcher (Fbodmother) Questions & Answers | camaro5 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 2 | 04-19-2008 05:07 PM |
Q&A with John Fitzpatrick - Camaro Marketing Manager | camaro5 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 4 | 04-15-2008 02:28 PM |