Camaro SS makes "Fastest cars under $50,000" list - Page 3 - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

godfathercrc · 07-02-2010, 10:58 PM

Chevy always gave more bang for your buck

ssump29 · 07-02-2010, 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CamaroMiami

412 hp, supercharged 5.0 base price = $46,725

426 hp, stock 6.2L base price = $33,945

most superchargers add about 100~144 hp,
therefore, is a non-supercharged 5.0 about 312 hp or less?

hahahaha wow you still screwed up your numbers. The new 5.0 isn't supercharged and its rated at 412 hp and starts at 30,000. The Supercharged 5.0 doesn't exsit yet, the Shelby uses a S/c 5.4 which is good for 550hp in the new 2011.

Also doubt your V6 camaro would hang with a 2010 GT and would get murdered by a 2011.

CamaroMiami · 07-03-2010, 01:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ssump29

hahahaha wow you still screwed up your numbers. The new 5.0 isn't supercharged and its rated at 412 hp and starts at 30,000. The Supercharged 5.0 doesn't exsit yet, the Shelby uses a S/c 5.4 which is good for 550hp in the new 2011.

Also doubt your V6 camaro would hang with a 2010 GT and would get murdered by a 2011.

I did not screw up the numbers, the "official FORD websites" states it.(ha,ha) http://bp2.forddirect.fordvehicles.c...age=/Packages/ Do you know a 2SS is a 6.2L V8? Don't get mad at me because the website has the price of the car at that high price.

CamaroMiami · 07-03-2010, 01:28 AM

This is what I seen

TaylorRyanSS · 07-03-2010, 01:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CamaroMiami

I did not screw up the numbers, the "official FORD websites" states it.(ha,ha) http://bp2.forddirect.fordvehicles.c...age=/Packages/ Do you know a 2SS is a 6.2L V8? Don't get mad at me because the website has the price of the car at that high price.

you put the 5.0 is supercharged which is wrong, you are looking at the GT500

CamaroMiami · 07-03-2010, 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TaylorRyan74

you put the 5.0 is supercharged which is wrong, you are looking at the GT500

I was wrong, my apology, I still adore the 2SS camaro more

usa1camaro1969 · 07-03-2010, 09:24 AM

Just wish the horse lovers would find their own site and stop trying to justify their ugly-car purchase here.

Vega · 07-03-2010, 11:30 PM

This RULES!
Ive been engaged in an argument on youtube for about a month from this twat that went onto a Challenger video and started talkin smack about how his precious BMWs would own it, this just proves my point haha, his BMWs have spunk but at 5.0 0-60 its just not spunky enough to keep up with our Detroit steel-clad warriors >=}
PLUS, our Muscle cars are way cheaper than that Euro crap, if we damage something, its a $100 fix in your garage, if they damage something its $10k and a 5 month trip over-seas back to its factory for specialty tooling. Not to mention ours come about $32k off the lot and theirs come $40k or more...when will the world catch on? Muscle is back, and its not here to stay, its here to REIGN!

THE KING HATH RETURN!

Vega · 07-03-2010, 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ssump29

hahahaha wow you still screwed up your numbers. The new 5.0 isn't supercharged and its rated at 412 hp and starts at 30,000. The Supercharged 5.0 doesn't exsit yet, the Shelby uses a S/c 5.4 which is good for 550hp in the new 2011.

Also doubt your V6 camaro would hang with a 2010 GT and would get murdered by a 2011.

Ehh sorry dude, im all for your argument and will never go Ford over GM but in the interest of muscle car fairness i gotta point out the GT350 is back and it is in fact a supercharged 5.0 =/
No offense meant, i just wanna keep it a fair fight =P
And a word of advice, now that that's out in the open i bet you could go look up the price of it and make your case there LOL! Rock on man

F YUR BMW · 07-04-2010, 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ssump29

hahahaha wow you still screwed up your numbers. The new 5.0 isn't supercharged and its rated at 412 hp and starts at 30,000. The Supercharged 5.0 doesn't exsit yet, the Shelby uses a S/c 5.4 which is good for 550hp in the new 2011.

Also doubt your V6 camaro would hang with a 2010 GT and would get murdered by a 2011.

The 305 HP the article quoted is the factory rated HP of the 2011 V6 and not the GT500. Judging from how the article was written, the author did not put much time into his research or proof reading.

OverZeaLouS · 07-11-2010, 09:31 AM

I have no idea how forbes came up with some of these numbers. No 370z is running 5.5, neither are G37s coupes. At worst the Z runs 5.1 and the G runs 5.4 at best the Z runs 4.6 and the G runs 4.9. Nissan doesn't advertise track times so this info is coming from kbb? Even kbb has the Z running at 5.0 and the G at 5.2 hmmmm
Other cars here I notice they have them running at there worst times rather than best times like the Bmw 135I at the track can pretty consistantly hit 4.8 second times and they got it running 5.1 they left out a crap load of cars that run under 5 seconds too. Like the wrx sti in 4.5 and the evo in 4.8. What avout the genesis coupe that does the run in 5.5? If its based on coupes only? The genesis was missing.

John Shields · 07-11-2010, 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by usa1camaro1969

Just wish the horse lovers would find their own site and stop trying to justify their ugly-car purchase here.

The old timeless battle of Camaro vs. Mustang is dead and gone. Camaro has won. Time to move forward.

mhood · 07-11-2010, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Shields

The old timeless battle of Camaro vs. Mustang is dead and gone. Camaro has won. Time to move forward.

It's that very same timeless battle that moves us forward...it is far from dead and gone. Competition fuels innovation and I for one am all for it. Besides, Challengers are awesome (come on MOPAR...rock us hard in 2012) and the 2011 Mustang GT500 raises the bar for everyone.

Barricade_643 · 07-12-2010, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheClassicCarKid

...

Ford's GT500 packs a supercharged 5.4-liter V8 engine with 305 horsepower and 208 pound feet of torque....

Huh? The regular 2010 Mustang GT has 315hp (according to Motortrend).
The GT500 has around 500 HP...!!

The 2011 Mustang GT has around 412-414 hp....depending on where u look or who you ask.

The 2011 GT500....well....its 550 horsepower and 510 lb-ft. of torque.

Where yall got a GT500 as 305 HP on a supercharged car is beyond me.

Im not gonna even address your 208 torque.....come on!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by usa1camaro1969

Just wish the horse lovers would find their own site and stop trying to justify their ugly-car purchase here.

I own both a Camaro and a Mustang....neither of which are ugly.

07-03-2010, 01:28 AM	#32
CamaroMiami Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS LS3, 92 Camaro RS Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Miami Posts: 530	2011 GT500 coupe This is what I seen Attached Images

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
CAMARO WIKI	Tran	Wiki	67	11-27-2024 09:02 AM
5th Gen Suspension -- The Book	JusticePete	Suspension / Brakes / Chassis	151	05-07-2015 06:52 PM
My Reivew of Camaro SS vs Mustang GT	ss ZHO	Chevy Camaro vs...	6	06-05-2010 01:23 AM
Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release	Tran	Camaro Convertible Forum	12	11-18-2009 08:05 PM

07-02-2010, 10:58 PM	#29
godfathercrc Drives: 2010 Chevy Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Indiana Posts: 244 View My Garage	Chevy always gave more bang for your buck

07-03-2010, 09:24 AM	#35
usa1camaro1969 Back on the dino-juice Drives: '10 LS + a few more Join Date: May 2010 Location: Texas Posts: 1,641	Just wish the horse lovers would find their own site and stop trying to justify their ugly-car purchase here.

07-03-2010, 11:30 PM	#36
Vega Drives: 91' Camaro RS Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Indianapolis, IN Posts: 589 View My Garage	This RULES! Ive been engaged in an argument on youtube for about a month from this twat that went onto a Challenger video and started talkin smack about how his precious BMWs would own it, this just proves my point haha, his BMWs have spunk but at 5.0 0-60 its just not spunky enough to keep up with our Detroit steel-clad warriors >=} PLUS, our Muscle cars are way cheaper than that Euro crap, if we damage something, its a $100 fix in your garage, if they damage something its $10k and a 5 month trip over-seas back to its factory for specialty tooling. Not to mention ours come about $32k off the lot and theirs come $40k or more...when will the world catch on? Muscle is back, and its not here to stay, its here to REIGN! THE KING HATH RETURN!

07-11-2010, 09:31 AM	#39
OverZeaLouS Drives: 17 Camaro 2SS & 16 acura TLX Join Date: May 2010 Location: DFW, Tx Posts: 85	I have no idea how forbes came up with some of these numbers. No 370z is running 5.5, neither are G37s coupes. At worst the Z runs 5.1 and the G runs 5.4 at best the Z runs 4.6 and the G runs 4.9. Nissan doesn't advertise track times so this info is coming from kbb? Even kbb has the Z running at 5.0 and the G at 5.2 hmmmm Other cars here I notice they have them running at there worst times rather than best times like the Bmw 135I at the track can pretty consistantly hit 4.8 second times and they got it running 5.1 they left out a crap load of cars that run under 5 seconds too. Like the wrx sti in 4.5 and the evo in 4.8. What avout the genesis coupe that does the run in 5.5? If its based on coupes only? The genesis was missing.