![]() |
|
|
#29 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS/RS LS3 RJT Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 754
|
You are also forgetting methanol injection. The more horsepower you draw out of the LS3, the more modifications you will need to stay safe. We have seen that 600hp to the wheels is pretty easily achievable. Once you get past 650 on the stock block, now you're looking at a built motor. The point being, that if all supporting mods are made, the KB should be good to very high psi. Also KB uses the same manifold for all 3 blowers. So the potential is there, if later on you want to go much higher, you can swap out just the rotor assembly separately to a 3.6 or 4.2. Hence, much more room to grow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
![]() Drives: Crane Truck Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 340
|
Quote:
i would think the TVS having a CARB# would make it a no brainer if you live in CA or a similar nazi smog state... this makes the choice simple for me... i WILL be getting a TVS for my SS when its ready.
__________________
1998 Z28 M6 SOLD :(
315rwhp (3500lbs) 1999 HUGGER SS SOLD :( 400rwhp (3375lbs) 2002 YELLOW Z06 SOLD :( 360rwhp (3040lbs) 2013 CAMARO ZL1 COMMING SOON |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Drives: 775HP 2005 KBGT Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Rancho Cucamonga
Posts: 74
|
We are pending with CARB we will have an EO number.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
www.Camaro5store.com
|
So...what I'm gathering is this...
If you go with the TVS 2300, you will be maxed out at HP levels at around 550 to 600 rwhp vs the KB which has other interchangeable parts which could potentially make a lot more hp over time should the owner upgrade? Is that correct? It appears that both set ups are good and both will be sufficient for daily driving with a bit of "get on it" here and there. It also seems that regardless of which way you go, it will provide the power that any upgrader would want. However, should one want to add a bit more over time, the KB is the only way to go. Is that correct? |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS/RS LS3 RJT Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 754
|
That is my understanding. However, many shops will argue that for the street there are practical limits to how much power you can use. Also keep in mind that the more power you add the more supporting mods will be required.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Okie doke
|
Quote:
For your normal daily driven 93 octane car, I don't think you will see much of a difference between the two ... I'm guessing that the KB will really shine for those that have a track only car and run the proper mods/gas to make the big power the larger KB can achieve. I always think back to my 04 cobra days .. you can max out the stock eaton on those cars pretty quick by upping the boost. You can then port the blower and go a bit farther .. say 16 lbs or so ... but that will most likely be it and the supercharger is no longer effiecent enough to warrent going higher .... those people then go to a whipple or KB solution (if they want to stay with the top mount) as those blowers can support much higher boost levels. Crowley
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS/RS LS3 RJT Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 754
|
Thanks for the explanation Crowley.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Drives: 1987 Buick Regal Turbo-T Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Grand Blanc, MI/Dearborn Heights, MI
Posts: 452
|
well we have made 640+rwhp more than once with an A6 car and a Magnacharger
![]() now the magnacharger has its limits for sure, and after that is where we make the switch to KB. They are both great products, as are all the superchargers available for the Camaro, and we are lucky enough to be dealers for every single one out there. Basically i lay it out like this: If you want the capability to run mid to bottom 10's the magnacharger will get you there no problem, if you want faster than that, then you have to step up the game some and go with KB. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 LPE 650+ CTS-V Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 1,640
|
Quote:
__________________
'10 CTS-V : LPE 650+ Package 587hp / 582tq
2.55 Upper / 8.6 Lower / ID850's / Kooks Longtubes / New Era CAI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS/RS LS3 RJT Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 754
|
speed74SS,
Are you sure the guy could drive? Sounds like he may have been looking for excuses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 LPE 650+ CTS-V Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 1,640
|
Quote:
__________________
'10 CTS-V : LPE 650+ Package 587hp / 582tq
2.55 Upper / 8.6 Lower / ID850's / Kooks Longtubes / New Era CAI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
www.Camaro5store.com
|
Good info, guys
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Petro-sexual
|
__________________
'20 ZL1 Black "Fury" A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Drives: 1999 Trans Am Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 2,018
|
Quote:
Yes,more power = more broken parts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cold Weather Blues Prevention Magnacharger Install Specials at Livernois Motorsports! | Andy@Livernois | Forced Induction | 4 | 12-09-2009 07:53 AM |
| MagnaCharger TVS 2300 - What fuel injectors & pulley are supplied on standard model? | thenaz | Forced Induction - V8 | 7 | 11-03-2009 11:23 PM |
| Mike Norris Motorsports Magnacharger Installed Packages - $7495 Plus $500 in MNM $$$ | Mike Norris | Forced Induction | 9 | 08-03-2009 10:51 PM |
| Magnacharger with what Performance parts??? | JJ2010 | Forced Induction - V8 | 8 | 07-30-2009 02:16 PM |
| Need to sell a magnacharger black supercharger | mwilkes | Forced Induction | 1 | 07-24-2009 09:13 AM |