Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Technical Camaro Topics > Camaro Issues / Problems | Warranty Discussions | TSB and Recalls


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-15-2016, 03:49 PM   #421
chain777
 
Drives: Slow
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Metro Chicago,Illinois
Posts: 560
Sorry to hear the outcome Superman09, your attitude about it is commendable but I still think you should reconsider fighting it. This is setting a precedent that is going to be disastrous to the modding community, especially to the vendors. I think it would be in Elite Engineerings best interests to help you out in this fight.
chain777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 03:50 PM   #422
BlueStreakHouTX
 
BlueStreakHouTX's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS RS IOM
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Spring Texas
Posts: 230
Quote:
Originally Posted by chain777 View Post
Sorry to hear the outcome Superman09, your attitude about it is commendable but I still think you should reconsider fighting it. This is setting a precedent that is going to be disastrous to the modding community, especially to the vendors. I think it would be in Elite Engineerings best interests to help you out in this fight.

BlueStreakHouTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 03:53 PM   #423
wvyankee2
 
wvyankee2's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 LT Turbo/6Man.
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 53
Total bullshit on GM's part. A catch can is a wide spot in he line that has no effect whatsoever on the loss of oil failure of your motor. They have a defective emissions system that causes premature failure of the intake valves and they should remedy it and not punish us for trying to. People who have Jeep's have modded them for years and Jeep has nearly always stood by their warranty. I like my Camaro but can't stand GM for various reasons of past experiences with them on warranty issues. My next Pony is a Mustang.
__________________
2017 LT Turbo4/6sp.Man.


wvyankee2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 03:56 PM   #424
motorhead


 
Drives: Love the one you're with
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Downtown Charlie Brown
Posts: 11,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDXSSCE View Post
Sales of catch-cans are sure to take a hit now that it's a proven fact that GM can & will void a whole powertrain warranty due to one being installed.



I know this won't be popular, but I'm more disappointed in the OP than GM. If GM's warranty position was so easily accepted, to the extent of coming to their defense, then it was pointless to post the issue in the forum.
Seeing that they've won, GM will be more emboldened to deny warranties for frivolous reasons.
I agree completely with what you are saying. He's just too nice of a fellow a guess. If it were me, I wouldn't care about the cost. They would know I exist everyday until made right. I still blame them for making inferior components and then blaming it on something else when it fails.
motorhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 04:16 PM   #425
bobby35ny


 
bobby35ny's Avatar
 
Drives: 18 ZL1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South East, FL
Posts: 3,023
There ya go folks!!!

A Cold Air Intake and a Catch Can will VOID your warranty if GM sees it!!
Just for the record, I WILL look at Ford and Dodge for my next vehicle the next time around.

I was always brand loyal, CHEVY for me! Not anymore!!!!!
-Bobby
__________________
2017 ZL1 M6 Bog City, 2013 ZL1 M6, 2010 2SS M6
ZL1::J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS
bobby35ny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 05:02 PM   #426
Chevy Fanatic
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS IOM/PEARL STRIPES-6M
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: DFW
Posts: 151
If it were me, at a minimum;

1) File a complaint with the FTC

2) I would take it to a shop for teardown / inspect, document / photograph the stuck relief valve, use the known sticking relief valve tech bulletin against GM, subpoena records of warranty oil pump replacements, obtain letter written by mechanic as to what was discovered upon teardown, file a small claims court case, sue to recover as much as court allows, in Texas I believe that is actual damages up to $10,000.00. Cost $50.00 or so to file suit / serve papers.
__________________
Whipple S/C, 3.750 pulley, JRE rough idle blower cam kit, Trunion upgrade, C5R timing chain, LS2 chain dampner, Melling 10296, Dynatech 1 7/8 LT headers, OR pipes, Dual valve RX catch can, ID 850 Injectors, LPE Dual fuel pump, CAI with Apex scoop, VMax ported T/B, ADM Tune 675 RWHP 560 TQ

Last edited by Chevy Fanatic; 05-15-2016 at 05:19 PM.
Chevy Fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 05:06 PM   #427
Mr. Stacy
El Duderino
 
Mr. Stacy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2LTRS Convertible
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,194
1. To be honest, it's not just GM.I have read similar issues with Ford and others...

2. If the OP were willing, we could start another legal fund. I know about 600 people who would probably pitch in. Sure... it may not go anywhere, but you could still get your car fixed, and possibly get reimbursed for the cost. Key here is we need someone who's willing to see it through. But I understand if you don't want to. It's obvious to almost anybody the mod(s) didn't cause the failure.

3. I read the entire 2015 warranty. No where does it state that any mod, even performance mods, will void your warranty. It ONLY states that parts damaged as a result of such modifications will not be covered. This is a no brainer for any competent attorney. A catch can, or even CAI cannot void your entire warranty. If you don't believe me, go read it.

http://www.chevrolet.com/owners/warranty.html

Get your car fixed. But let us fight it.
__________________
I bowl. Drive around. The occasional acid flashback.
Mr. Stacy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 05:11 PM   #428
PDXSSCE
Yee-aay-ee!
 
PDXSSCE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 2SS/RS CV CE
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: ORegon
Posts: 2,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Stacy View Post
3. I read the entire 2015 warranty. No where does it state that any mod, even performance mods, will void your warranty. It ONLY states that parts damaged as a result of such modifications will not be covered. This is a no brainer for any competent attorney. A catch can, or even CAI cannot void your entire warranty. If you don't believe me, go read it.

http://www.chevrolet.com/owners/warranty.html
Bingo.
__________________
PDXSSCE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 05:13 PM   #429
motorhead


 
Drives: Love the one you're with
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Downtown Charlie Brown
Posts: 11,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Stacy View Post
1. To be honest, it's not just GM.I have read similar issues with Ford and others...

2. If the OP were willing, we could start another legal fund. I know about 600 people who would probably pitch in. Sure... it may not go anywhere, but you could still get your car fixed, and possibly get reimbursed for the cost. Key here is we need someone who's willing to see it through. But I understand if you don't want to. It's obvious to almost anybody the mod(s) didn't cause the failure.

3. I read the entire 2015 warranty. No where does it state that any mod, even performance mods, will void your warranty. It ONLY states that parts damaged as a result of such modifications will not be covered. This is a no brainer for any competent attorney. A catch can, or even CAI cannot void your entire warranty. If you don't believe me, go read it.

http://www.chevrolet.com/owners/warranty.html

Get your car fixed. But let us fight it.
And thus why I'm done with GM unless they show proof as to the catch can being the cause of a pump failure. They don't deserve the money that I bust my ass to earn at this point.
motorhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 05:25 PM   #430
Tenring

 
Tenring's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS/RS M6 Commemorative
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chevy Fanatic View Post
I have made my last GM purchase. I will not sit back and watch this nonsense unfold that blames a oil pump failure on a unrelated component. GM will not ever see another dime from me because of this.
Couldn't agree more, this was the final straw.
Tenring is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 05:32 PM   #431
chuckie669

 
chuckie669's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 ss
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: E-TX
Posts: 764
Damn. This is sad news
chuckie669 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 05:48 PM   #432
BlueStreakHouTX
 
BlueStreakHouTX's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS RS IOM
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Spring Texas
Posts: 230
Quote:
Originally Posted by motorhead View Post
And thus why I'm done with GM unless they show proof as to the catch can being the cause of a pump failure. They don't deserve the money that I bust my ass to earn at this point.
If I read all the posts correctly, GM stated they blocked the warranty claim due to the modification of "catch can", which "starved the engine for oil and caused the failure"... they did not say how, they did not attempt to offer proof, nor did they address the possibility of it being related to an oil pump failure.... seems like they legally covered their bases pretty well.

Waiting for the Aftermarket Performance guys to let the full weight of this decision sink in.

Last edited by BlueStreakHouTX; 05-15-2016 at 06:09 PM. Reason: typo
BlueStreakHouTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 06:09 PM   #433
motorhead


 
Drives: Love the one you're with
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Downtown Charlie Brown
Posts: 11,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueStreakHouTX View Post
If I read all the posts correctly, GM stated they blocked the warranty claim due to the modification of "catch can", which "starved the engine for oil and caused the failure"... they did not say how, they did not attempt to offer proof, nor did they address the possibility of it being related to an oil pump failure.... seems like they legally covered their behinds pretty well.

Waiting for the Aftermarket Performance guys to let the full weight of this decision sink in.
No of which makes any sense if in fact the failure is the oil pump. When the oil pump doesn't work the engine is starved from getting oil. The pick up for the pump is in the bottom of the oil pan. Are they saying the catch can caused all the oil in the pan to disappear and uncover the pickup? All of which happened in the few seconds it took the OP to see the problem right after starting the car which had no problem before that last start. I CALL BS WITHOUT PROOF!
THE OP STATED THAT THE CAR HAD OIL RIGHT AFTER HE SHUT IT OFF AFTER FINDING THE ISSUE. PUMP ISN'T STARVED OF OIL UNLESS THERE IS NO OIL AT THE PICKUP. HE SAID IT HAD OIL. I HAVE NO REASON NOT TO BELIEVE HIM. SURE THE MOTOR GOT STARVED. THAT HAPPENS WHEN THE PUMP FAILS.

This is completely insane unless we are not getting the entire story. I believe we are though.
motorhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2016, 07:33 PM   #434
HeaterMan
 
HeaterMan's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 PP GT
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: PNW
Posts: 264
something doesn't seem right here.. all is not as is stated or appears. nobody who is that much in the right gives up that easily.. nobody
__________________
1966 Buick GS
2018 PP1 A10 Mustang GT

2016 Scat Pack Challenger (gone 1-6-2018)
2013 Mustang GT Auto(sold)
2013 Track pack Mustang 5.0 (sold)
2011 Mustang 5.0 (sold)
2010 Camaro SS 6M ( sold)13.36 @109
HeaterMan is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.